東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Neo-Victorianism and Empathy:time, A...

Zhang, Muren.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Neo-Victorianism and Empathy:time, Affect, and the Ethics of Reading.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Neo-Victorianism and Empathy:time, Affect, and the Ethics of Reading./
作者:	Zhang, Muren.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	267 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-01A.
標題:	Empathy. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30531498
ISBN:	9798379871383

Neo-Victorianism and Empathy:time, Affect, and the Ethics of Reading.
Zhang, Muren.

Neo-Victorianism and Empathy:time, Affect, and the Ethics of Reading. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 267 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lancaster University (United Kingdom), 2017.

This thesis argues that recent cultural-theoretical research on narrative temporality, empathy and affect can be usefully brought to bear upon one other in order to interrogate the ethics of reading neo-Victorian literature. I present neo-Victorian literature as a genre defined by its contemporary exploitation of, and experimentation with, 'empathetic narrative' (Sylvia Adamson, 2001) and, in contrast with the historical preoccupation of much neo-Victorian criticism, focus instead on what is distinctive about the ways in which readers of these texts are positioned. In so doing, I open the texts up to the work of a wide range of literary, cultural, philosophical and psychoanalytic theorists including Lauren Berlant, Amy Coplan, Mark Currie, Marshall W. Gregory, Suzanne Keen, Melanie Klein, Jean-Paul Sartre, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Silvan Tomkins. In contrast to the popular understanding of neoVictorianism as a genre that seeks to explore the afterlife of the Victorians, my focus is on the wide-ranging ethical and political implications of its 'empathetic narrative', both with respect to the representation of intra-diegetic characters and the text-reader relationship. The authors I use to explore these ideas include Margaret Atwood, Julian Barnes, Graeme Macrae Burnet, Michael Cox, Jane Harris and Sarah Waters whose texts complicate and unsettle reader-pleasure by making empathy into an uncomfortable and ethically challenging experience. Despite these discomforts, the thesis combines empathy studies, ethical criticism, affect studies and the philosophical interrogation of temporality in order to provide a future-orientated, reparative and politically meaningful way of reading neo-Victorian literature. Each chapter brings in an approach to empathy from disciplines as various as psychology (Heinz Kohut), phenomenology (Edmund Husserl, Edith Stein and Dan Zahavi) and aesthetics (Robert Vischer, Harry Francis Mallgrave and Eleftherios Ikonomou) in recognition of its contested meaning and significance. By considering the concept of empathy in relation to the affective landscape of neo-Victorian texts, this thesis thus shifts the study of neo-Victorianism from a postmodern critique of historiographic metafiction to an ethical interrogation of the reader-text relationship. This is with the aim of breathing new life into the debates associated with the genre and demonstrating new ways of reading and valuing the texts.

ISBN: 9798379871383Subjects--Topical Terms:

532108
Empathy.

Neo-Victorianism and Empathy:time, Affect, and the Ethics of Reading.
LDR:03630nmm a2200409 4500 001 2402394
005 20241028051822.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798379871383
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30531498
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Lancaster_124059
035 $a AAI30531498
035 $a 2402394
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Zhang, Muren. $3 3772622
245 1 0 $a Neo-Victorianism and Empathy:time, Affect, and the Ethics of Reading.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 267 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Pearce, Lynne;Carruthers, Jo.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lancaster University (United Kingdom), 2017.
520 $a This thesis argues that recent cultural-theoretical research on narrative temporality, empathy and affect can be usefully brought to bear upon one other in order to interrogate the ethics of reading neo-Victorian literature. I present neo-Victorian literature as a genre defined by its contemporary exploitation of, and experimentation with, 'empathetic narrative' (Sylvia Adamson, 2001) and, in contrast with the historical preoccupation of much neo-Victorian criticism, focus instead on what is distinctive about the ways in which readers of these texts are positioned. In so doing, I open the texts up to the work of a wide range of literary, cultural, philosophical and psychoanalytic theorists including Lauren Berlant, Amy Coplan, Mark Currie, Marshall W. Gregory, Suzanne Keen, Melanie Klein, Jean-Paul Sartre, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Silvan Tomkins. In contrast to the popular understanding of neoVictorianism as a genre that seeks to explore the afterlife of the Victorians, my focus is on the wide-ranging ethical and political implications of its 'empathetic narrative', both with respect to the representation of intra-diegetic characters and the text-reader relationship. The authors I use to explore these ideas include Margaret Atwood, Julian Barnes, Graeme Macrae Burnet, Michael Cox, Jane Harris and Sarah Waters whose texts complicate and unsettle reader-pleasure by making empathy into an uncomfortable and ethically challenging experience. Despite these discomforts, the thesis combines empathy studies, ethical criticism, affect studies and the philosophical interrogation of temporality in order to provide a future-orientated, reparative and politically meaningful way of reading neo-Victorian literature. Each chapter brings in an approach to empathy from disciplines as various as psychology (Heinz Kohut), phenomenology (Edmund Husserl, Edith Stein and Dan Zahavi) and aesthetics (Robert Vischer, Harry Francis Mallgrave and Eleftherios Ikonomou) in recognition of its contested meaning and significance. By considering the concept of empathy in relation to the affective landscape of neo-Victorian texts, this thesis thus shifts the study of neo-Victorianism from a postmodern critique of historiographic metafiction to an ethical interrogation of the reader-text relationship. This is with the aim of breathing new life into the debates associated with the genre and demonstrating new ways of reading and valuing the texts.
590 $a School code: 0416.
650 4 $a Empathy. $3 532108
650 4 $a Modernism. $3 3556282
650 4 $a Victorian period. $3 3542096
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
650 4 $a Novels. $3 3566249
650 4 $a Aesthetics. $3 523036
650 4 $a Cultural heritage. $3 3321334
650 4 $a Cultural resources management. $3 2122774
650 4 $a European history. $2 bicssc $3 1972904
650 4 $a History. $3 516518
650 4 $a Literature. $3 537498
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
690 $a 0650
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0436
690 $a 0335
690 $a 0578
690 $a 0401
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0535
710 2 $a Lancaster University (United Kingdom). $3 1294170
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-01A.
790 $a 0416
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30531498