東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How Assessments Influence the Concep...

DeGlopper, Kimberly S.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How Assessments Influence the Conceptual Ideas Students Invoke for Explaining Chemical Phenomena and Modeling and Characterizing Epistemic Ideas for Teaching and Learning Chemistry.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How Assessments Influence the Conceptual Ideas Students Invoke for Explaining Chemical Phenomena and Modeling and Characterizing Epistemic Ideas for Teaching and Learning Chemistry./
作者:	DeGlopper, Kimberly S.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	370 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-12B.
標題:	Chemistry. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31329788
ISBN:	9798383046760

How Assessments Influence the Conceptual Ideas Students Invoke for Explaining Chemical Phenomena and Modeling and Characterizing Epistemic Ideas for Teaching and Learning Chemistry.
DeGlopper, Kimberly S.

How Assessments Influence the Conceptual Ideas Students Invoke for Explaining Chemical Phenomena and Modeling and Characterizing Epistemic Ideas for Teaching and Learning Chemistry. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 370 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2024.

The work presented in the following chapters was undertaken with the goal of understanding and improving education in organic chemistry. Initial work, described in Chapters 1 and 2, focuses on students' ability to explain and rationalize the outcomes of organic chemistry reactions. Chapter 1 explores the relationship between assessment emphasis and the structure-energy connections students made when asked to explain the outcome of a hydrobromination reaction. Using a mixed methods study design, an association was found between the kinds of tasks students were given on assessments and the ideas they utilized in their written explanations on a separate researcher-authored assessment. The relationship between assessment emphasis and conceptual ideas was probed qualitatively in Chapter 2. Students were interviewed as they proposed electron-pushing mechanisms and predicted the products for familiar and unfamiliar reactions. The ideas they drew on in their reasoning were found to be similar to the core ideas around which their course was designed, indicating that the students had internalized the utility of these ideas for problem-solving.More recently, the focus of the work has shifted toward understanding the epistemic aspect of organic chemistry education. Chapter 2 describes our first foray into epistemology; in addition to characterizing the conceptual resources students invoked, we characterized some of the epistemic resources they utilized. This allowed us to differentiate between moments when students were recalling explanations versus moments when they were constructing them in the moment by connecting different bits of prior knowledge. Chapter 3 presents a critical review of how the field of chemistry education has studied and modeled undergraduate students' epistemic cognition and in particular, draws attention to the implications of evaluating students' epistemic cognition in a hierarchical manner that does not attend to context. In Chapter 4, we compare two ways of modeling epistemic cognition and discuss their affordances and limitations with regard to interpreting interview data on organic chemistry instructor's thinking for teaching and learning chemistry.

ISBN: 9798383046760Subjects--Topical Terms:

516420
Chemistry.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Assessments

How Assessments Influence the Conceptual Ideas Students Invoke for Explaining Chemical Phenomena and Modeling and Characterizing Epistemic Ideas for Teaching and Learning Chemistry.
LDR:03537nmm a2200421 4500 001 2402266
005 20241028051512.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798383046760
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31329788
035 $a AAI31329788
035 $a 2402266
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a DeGlopper, Kimberly S. $3 3772487
245 1 0 $a How Assessments Influence the Conceptual Ideas Students Invoke for Explaining Chemical Phenomena and Modeling and Characterizing Epistemic Ideas for Teaching and Learning Chemistry.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 370 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Stowe, Ryan L.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2024.
520 $a The work presented in the following chapters was undertaken with the goal of understanding and improving education in organic chemistry. Initial work, described in Chapters 1 and 2, focuses on students' ability to explain and rationalize the outcomes of organic chemistry reactions. Chapter 1 explores the relationship between assessment emphasis and the structure-energy connections students made when asked to explain the outcome of a hydrobromination reaction. Using a mixed methods study design, an association was found between the kinds of tasks students were given on assessments and the ideas they utilized in their written explanations on a separate researcher-authored assessment. The relationship between assessment emphasis and conceptual ideas was probed qualitatively in Chapter 2. Students were interviewed as they proposed electron-pushing mechanisms and predicted the products for familiar and unfamiliar reactions. The ideas they drew on in their reasoning were found to be similar to the core ideas around which their course was designed, indicating that the students had internalized the utility of these ideas for problem-solving.More recently, the focus of the work has shifted toward understanding the epistemic aspect of organic chemistry education. Chapter 2 describes our first foray into epistemology; in addition to characterizing the conceptual resources students invoked, we characterized some of the epistemic resources they utilized. This allowed us to differentiate between moments when students were recalling explanations versus moments when they were constructing them in the moment by connecting different bits of prior knowledge. Chapter 3 presents a critical review of how the field of chemistry education has studied and modeled undergraduate students' epistemic cognition and in particular, draws attention to the implications of evaluating students' epistemic cognition in a hierarchical manner that does not attend to context. In Chapter 4, we compare two ways of modeling epistemic cognition and discuss their affordances and limitations with regard to interpreting interview data on organic chemistry instructor's thinking for teaching and learning chemistry.
590 $a School code: 0262.
650 4 $a Chemistry. $3 516420
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
653 $a Assessments
653 $a Epistemology
653 $a Student explanations
653 $a Organic chemistry
653 $a Chemistry students
690 $a 0485
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0714
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Madison. $b Chemistry. $3 2049906
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-12B.
790 $a 0262
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31329788