東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Diversity in Teams: Differential Eff...

Royes, Joshua J.,

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Diversity in Teams: Differential Effects of Deep-Level Compositional Diversity Characteristics of a Team /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Diversity in Teams: Differential Effects of Deep-Level Compositional Diversity Characteristics of a Team // Joshua J Royes.
Author:	Royes, Joshua J.,
Description:	1 electronic resource (189 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-04B.
Subject:	Psychology. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28498344
ISBN:	9798544205975

Diversity in Teams: Differential Effects of Deep-Level Compositional Diversity Characteristics of a Team /
Royes, Joshua J.,

Diversity in Teams: Differential Effects of Deep-Level Compositional Diversity Characteristics of a Team /Joshua J Royes. - 1 electronic resource (189 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.

The purpose of this dissertation is to examine the impact that actual and perceived diversity within a team can have on team effectiveness. The majority of diversity research has been conducted on surface-level diversity variables, but deep-level variables are more impactful on team effectiveness (Tu, Hong, Jiang, & Zhang, 2020). This research project used the compositional diversity framework developed by Harrison and Klein (2007) to operationalize individual difference variables as deep-level diversity variables. This framework splits diversity variables into one of three diversity types, with each type having predetermined linear relationships with team outcomes. In addition to diversity, team members also form perceptions of the diversity on the team, and although related, the diversity on a team and the diversity that is perceived on a team are distinct concepts (Shemla, Meyer, Greer, & Jehn, 2016). It was hypothesized that in addition to the diversity variables having their predetermined relationships with team effectivess outcomes, perceived diversity would be more related to subjective outcomes (i.e., team satisfaction and team viability) than actual diversity, while actual diversity would be more related to objective outcomes (i.e., team performance) than perceived diversity.This study collected data from a single timepoint survey sent to college or university students who were working on 3-8-person team projects within their courses. Hierarchical regression was used to examine if diversity variables could predict team effectiveness variables above and beyond team-level variables. Support was found for diversity predicting team effectiveness above and beyond tea-level variables. Inconsistent support was found for the hypotheses; however, the results do make contributions to the field in several regards. First, this study found that actual and perceived diversity are not interchangeable constructs, and in fact, the relationship that diversity and perceived diversity have with one another vary by the construct in question. Second, diversity variables are important determinants of team effectiveness as evidenced by the relationships that diversity had with the team effectiveness variables. Third, team members vary in their perceptions of diversity within their own team, and oftentimes could not reliably rate the perceptions of team-level diversity. And fourth, the Harrison and Klein (2007) framework is a meaningful way to organize diversity variables. In fact, this study exhibited stronger relationships between diversity and outcomes as a previous meta-analysis (i.e., Bell, Villado, Lukasik, Belau, & Briggs, 2011) that used primarily surface-level variables, perhaps suggesting that the Harrison and Klein (2007) framework is well-suited to deep-level diversity variables.

English

ISBN: 9798544205975Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Deep-level diversity

Diversity in Teams: Differential Effects of Deep-Level Compositional Diversity Characteristics of a Team /
LDR:04295nmm a22004333i 4500 001 2401696
005 20250522102051.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 251215s2021 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798544205975
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI28498344
035 $a AAI28498344
035 $a 2401696
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Royes, Joshua J., $e author. $3 3771823
245 1 0 $a Diversity in Teams: Differential Effects of Deep-Level Compositional Diversity Characteristics of a Team / $c Joshua J Royes.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 1 electronic resource (189 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Narayan, Anupama Committee members: Fisher, David; Davis, Joanna; Packell, Katie.
502 $b Ph.D. $c The University of Tulsa $d 2021.
520 $a The purpose of this dissertation is to examine the impact that actual and perceived diversity within a team can have on team effectiveness. The majority of diversity research has been conducted on surface-level diversity variables, but deep-level variables are more impactful on team effectiveness (Tu, Hong, Jiang, & Zhang, 2020). This research project used the compositional diversity framework developed by Harrison and Klein (2007) to operationalize individual difference variables as deep-level diversity variables. This framework splits diversity variables into one of three diversity types, with each type having predetermined linear relationships with team outcomes. In addition to diversity, team members also form perceptions of the diversity on the team, and although related, the diversity on a team and the diversity that is perceived on a team are distinct concepts (Shemla, Meyer, Greer, & Jehn, 2016). It was hypothesized that in addition to the diversity variables having their predetermined relationships with team effectivess outcomes, perceived diversity would be more related to subjective outcomes (i.e., team satisfaction and team viability) than actual diversity, while actual diversity would be more related to objective outcomes (i.e., team performance) than perceived diversity.This study collected data from a single timepoint survey sent to college or university students who were working on 3-8-person team projects within their courses. Hierarchical regression was used to examine if diversity variables could predict team effectiveness variables above and beyond team-level variables. Support was found for diversity predicting team effectiveness above and beyond tea-level variables. Inconsistent support was found for the hypotheses; however, the results do make contributions to the field in several regards. First, this study found that actual and perceived diversity are not interchangeable constructs, and in fact, the relationship that diversity and perceived diversity have with one another vary by the construct in question. Second, diversity variables are important determinants of team effectiveness as evidenced by the relationships that diversity had with the team effectiveness variables. Third, team members vary in their perceptions of diversity within their own team, and oftentimes could not reliably rate the perceptions of team-level diversity. And fourth, the Harrison and Klein (2007) framework is a meaningful way to organize diversity variables. In fact, this study exhibited stronger relationships between diversity and outcomes as a previous meta-analysis (i.e., Bell, Villado, Lukasik, Belau, & Briggs, 2011) that used primarily surface-level variables, perhaps suggesting that the Harrison and Klein (2007) framework is well-suited to deep-level diversity variables.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0236
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Culture. $3 517003
650 4 $a Equality. $3 520285
650 4 $a Social activism. $3 3556019
650 4 $a Teams. $3 3546566
650 4 $a Multiculturalism & pluralism. $3 3558958
650 4 $a Race. $3 529036
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
653 $a Deep-level diversity
653 $a Diversity conceptualization
653 $a Team effectiveness
653 $a Teams
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a The University of Tulsa. $b Industrial/Organizational Psychology. $e degree granting institution. $3 3771824
720 1 $a Narayan, Anupama $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-04B.
790 $a 0236
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28498344