東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Comparing Financial, Environmental, ...

Roberts, Carly.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparing Financial, Environmental, and Governance Outcomes of Product Stewardship Funding for Plastic Packaging in the US by Consumer-Packaged Goods Firms.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Comparing Financial, Environmental, and Governance Outcomes of Product Stewardship Funding for Plastic Packaging in the US by Consumer-Packaged Goods Firms./
Author:	Roberts, Carly.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
Description:	103 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-11.
Subject:	Sustainability. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31241609
ISBN:	9798382601205

Comparing Financial, Environmental, and Governance Outcomes of Product Stewardship Funding for Plastic Packaging in the US by Consumer-Packaged Goods Firms.
Roberts, Carly.

Comparing Financial, Environmental, and Governance Outcomes of Product Stewardship Funding for Plastic Packaging in the US by Consumer-Packaged Goods Firms. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 103 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.

Thesis (A.L.M.)--Harvard University, 2024.

The significant carbon footprint of the plastic lifecycle, rate of emissions of plastic pollutants, and proliferation of single-use plastic packaging for consumer-packaged goods threaten human health and essential Earth system processes. The consumer-packaged goods (CPG) industry is both a user and producer of plastic packaging and therefore has significant decision-making power over plastic packaging use. This study evaluated the effects of implementing product stewardship efforts for plastic packaging in the United States, where funding take-back and recycling programs, deposit and return schemes, and reusable and refillable packaging is, at present, voluntary.Fifty-four consumer packaged goods firms were included in this study and categorized as engaging in product stewardship or not engaging in product stewardship for their plastic packaging in the United States. A dataset was built from sustainability reports, dashboards, disclosures, corporate websites, and publicly accessible financial performance data. Twenty-seven matched pairs of CPG firms were created from the sample to conduct the comparative analysis. Both a paired t-test and a Wilcoxon signed ranks test were used to comparatively assess the impacts of funding product stewardship on firms' plastic footprints and corporate financial performance and determine the correlation between product stewardship funding and circularity governance.Contrary to my prediction, the comparative analysis revealed that firms funding product stewardship for plastic packaging in the United States did not demonstrate a reduced total weight of plastic packaging or a greater share in reusable, recyclable, and/or compostable packaging compared to firms that do not fund product stewardship. Similarly surprising, a comparison of accounting rates of return indicated there were no significant financial trade-offs in voluntarily engaging in these forms of product stewardship. Voluntary product stewardship funding, in fact, correlated with better corporate financial performance. Matched pair t-tests revealed significant differences in return-on-equity (ROE) (p = 0.014), return-on-assets (ROA) (p = 0.015), and number of global circular economy (CE) alliances supported (p = 0.024); these results were corroborated by Wilcoxon signed rank tests.This research underscored the need to incentivize high recycling rates and develop policy interventions to encourage circular design in addition to product stewardship funding. It reinforced that a cap on global plastic production is necessary. The findings also demonstrated the need for greater participation by CPG firms in global circular economy alliances and partnerships and greater plastic packaging transparency in the sector overall.

ISBN: 9798382601205Subjects--Topical Terms:

1029978
Sustainability.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Circular economy

Comparing Financial, Environmental, and Governance Outcomes of Product Stewardship Funding for Plastic Packaging in the US by Consumer-Packaged Goods Firms.
LDR:04034nmm a2200409 4500 001 2401478
005 20241022112625.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382601205
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31241609
035 $a AAI31241609
035 $a 2401478
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Roberts, Carly. $3 2009341
245 1 0 $a Comparing Financial, Environmental, and Governance Outcomes of Product Stewardship Funding for Plastic Packaging in the US by Consumer-Packaged Goods Firms.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 103 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11.
500 $a Advisor: Leighton, Mark.
502 $a Thesis (A.L.M.)--Harvard University, 2024.
520 $a The significant carbon footprint of the plastic lifecycle, rate of emissions of plastic pollutants, and proliferation of single-use plastic packaging for consumer-packaged goods threaten human health and essential Earth system processes. The consumer-packaged goods (CPG) industry is both a user and producer of plastic packaging and therefore has significant decision-making power over plastic packaging use. This study evaluated the effects of implementing product stewardship efforts for plastic packaging in the United States, where funding take-back and recycling programs, deposit and return schemes, and reusable and refillable packaging is, at present, voluntary.Fifty-four consumer packaged goods firms were included in this study and categorized as engaging in product stewardship or not engaging in product stewardship for their plastic packaging in the United States. A dataset was built from sustainability reports, dashboards, disclosures, corporate websites, and publicly accessible financial performance data. Twenty-seven matched pairs of CPG firms were created from the sample to conduct the comparative analysis. Both a paired t-test and a Wilcoxon signed ranks test were used to comparatively assess the impacts of funding product stewardship on firms' plastic footprints and corporate financial performance and determine the correlation between product stewardship funding and circularity governance.Contrary to my prediction, the comparative analysis revealed that firms funding product stewardship for plastic packaging in the United States did not demonstrate a reduced total weight of plastic packaging or a greater share in reusable, recyclable, and/or compostable packaging compared to firms that do not fund product stewardship. Similarly surprising, a comparison of accounting rates of return indicated there were no significant financial trade-offs in voluntarily engaging in these forms of product stewardship. Voluntary product stewardship funding, in fact, correlated with better corporate financial performance. Matched pair t-tests revealed significant differences in return-on-equity (ROE) (p = 0.014), return-on-assets (ROA) (p = 0.015), and number of global circular economy (CE) alliances supported (p = 0.024); these results were corroborated by Wilcoxon signed rank tests.This research underscored the need to incentivize high recycling rates and develop policy interventions to encourage circular design in addition to product stewardship funding. It reinforced that a cap on global plastic production is necessary. The findings also demonstrated the need for greater participation by CPG firms in global circular economy alliances and partnerships and greater plastic packaging transparency in the sector overall.
590 $a School code: 0084.
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
650 4 $a Packaging. $3 585030
650 4 $a Environmental science. $3 677245
653 $a Circular economy
653 $a Consumer-packaged goods
653 $a Plastic footprint
653 $a Plastic packaging
653 $a Producer responsibility
653 $a Plastic pollutants
690 $a 0640
690 $a 0549
690 $a 0768
710 2 $a Harvard University. $b Extension Studies. $3 3560717
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-11.
790 $a 0084
791 $a A.L.M.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31241609