東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Essays in corporate finance.

Svetina, Marko.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Essays in corporate finance.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Essays in corporate finance./
作者:	Svetina, Marko.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2008,
面頁冊數:	90 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 70-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International70-03A.
標題:	Studies. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3311757
ISBN:	9780549595977

Essays in corporate finance.
Svetina, Marko.

Essays in corporate finance. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2008 - 90 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 70-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2008.

This dissertation investigates two questions in empirical corporate finance. The first essay studies the universe of exchange traded funds (ETFs) from their inception to the end of 2007 and their impact on passive investment management industry. ETFs that track an index, for which there are no pre-existing IMFs, expand investors' investment opportunity set but underperform their benchmarks. ETFs that compete directly with retail (institutional) IMFs deliver better (equivalent) net of fees returns. The effects of competition are apparent; ETF introduction reduces flows to incumbent IMFs and ETFs. The second essay examines the differences in gains to public targets in acquisitions made by private equity and public bidders. If the acquirer is a public firm, premiums (CARs) to target shareholders are 18% (55%) larger than if the acquirer is a private equity firm. These gains are robust to controlling for differences in synergistic gains, target and deal characteristics, the form of payment, and the completion status. In addition, this essay examines contested bids where public and private equity firms bid for the same target, and finds that if the winner is a public firm, target premiums (CARs) are 32% (100%) larger than if the acquirer is a private equity firm. Public acquirers which management owns a large (small) part of their own firm pay less (more) for their targets, a finding consistent with the agency problem hypothesis. Private equity acquirers' post-acquisition performance, on the other hand, is consistent with the synergistic motives hypothesis. The observed difference in premiums is likely due to the combination of these two hypotheses, between which this essay is unable to differentiate.

ISBN: 9780549595977Subjects--Topical Terms:

3433795
Studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Corporate finance

Essays in corporate finance.
LDR:02761nmm a2200349 4500 001 2400875
005 20240930130049.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549595977
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3311757
035 $a AAI3311757
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Svetina, Marko. $3 3770936
245 1 0 $a Essays in corporate finance.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2008
300 $a 90 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 70-03, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2008.
520 $a This dissertation investigates two questions in empirical corporate finance. The first essay studies the universe of exchange traded funds (ETFs) from their inception to the end of 2007 and their impact on passive investment management industry. ETFs that track an index, for which there are no pre-existing IMFs, expand investors' investment opportunity set but underperform their benchmarks. ETFs that compete directly with retail (institutional) IMFs deliver better (equivalent) net of fees returns. The effects of competition are apparent; ETF introduction reduces flows to incumbent IMFs and ETFs. The second essay examines the differences in gains to public targets in acquisitions made by private equity and public bidders. If the acquirer is a public firm, premiums (CARs) to target shareholders are 18% (55%) larger than if the acquirer is a private equity firm. These gains are robust to controlling for differences in synergistic gains, target and deal characteristics, the form of payment, and the completion status. In addition, this essay examines contested bids where public and private equity firms bid for the same target, and finds that if the winner is a public firm, target premiums (CARs) are 32% (100%) larger than if the acquirer is a private equity firm. Public acquirers which management owns a large (small) part of their own firm pay less (more) for their targets, a finding consistent with the agency problem hypothesis. Private equity acquirers' post-acquisition performance, on the other hand, is consistent with the synergistic motives hypothesis. The observed difference in premiums is likely due to the combination of these two hypotheses, between which this essay is unable to differentiate.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Studies. $3 3433795
650 4 $a Investigations. $3 3561159
650 4 $a Lifecycle funds. $3 3770937
650 4 $a Prices. $3 652651
650 4 $a Growth rate. $3 3562870
650 4 $a Time series. $3 3561811
650 4 $a Competition. $3 537031
650 4 $a Innovations. $3 754112
650 4 $a Proprietary. $3 3770938
650 4 $a Finance. $3 542899
650 4 $a Securities lending. $3 684400
650 4 $a Fees & charges. $3 3642178
653 $a Corporate finance
653 $a Exchange-traded funds
653 $a Private equity
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0511
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $3 1017445
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 70-03A.
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3311757