東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Leaders, Followers, and the Space Be...

MacMillan, Karen T. .

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Leaders, Followers, and the Space Between: a Three Dimensional View of Leader Attention and Decision-Making.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Leaders, Followers, and the Space Between: a Three Dimensional View of Leader Attention and Decision-Making./
作者:	MacMillan, Karen T. .
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2013,
面頁冊數:	155 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-02B.
標題:	Behavior. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29241646
ISBN:	9798841591238

Leaders, Followers, and the Space Between: a Three Dimensional View of Leader Attention and Decision-Making.
MacMillan, Karen T. .

Leaders, Followers, and the Space Between: a Three Dimensional View of Leader Attention and Decision-Making. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2013 - 155 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Western Ontario (Canada), 2013.

A quasi-experimental field study explores how follower voice, leader regulatory focus and leader-member exchange (LMX) affect leader attention and decision-making. The model responds to calls for more work into the interplay between leaders and followers and the effect on leadership (Avolio, 2007; Howell & Shamir, 2005), the integration of top-down and bottom-up processes that affect attention (Ocasio, 2011; Rerup, 2009); and the types, tactics, targets, and outcomes of follower voice (Morrison, 2011). Twentyseven established leaders and their followers completed on-line instruments in a timelagged fashion. Leaders were asked to respond to common managerial issues based on the General Management In-Box, a well-known in-basket exercise (Joines, 2011). Each scenario was accompanied by advisory messages that varied in (1) LMX level of the follower sender and (2) promotive or prohibitive voice type (Liang, Farh, & Farh, 2012). Results show the quality of the relationship between the leader and the follower message sender influenced leader interest and decision-making directly and as a moderator of the path between follower voice type and leader decision-making. Regulatory focus did not moderate the relationship between follower voice and leader attention. Contrary to predictions, promotive voice (messages about opportunities) influenced leader attention and decisions more than prohibitive voice (messages about threats). The contributions of these findings to the follower, voice, attention, LMX, and regulatory focus literatures are discussed.

ISBN: 9798841591238Subjects--Topical Terms:

532476
Behavior.

Leaders, Followers, and the Space Between: a Three Dimensional View of Leader Attention and Decision-Making.
LDR:02659nmm a2200337 4500 001 2400792
005 20240930130034.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798841591238
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29241646
035 $a (MiAaPQ)oaiirlibuwocaetd3156
035 $a AAI29241646
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a MacMillan, Karen T. . $3 3770849
245 1 0 $a Leaders, Followers, and the Space Between: a Three Dimensional View of Leader Attention and Decision-Making.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2013
300 $a 155 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Howell, Jane;Hurst, Charlice.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Western Ontario (Canada), 2013.
520 $a A quasi-experimental field study explores how follower voice, leader regulatory focus and leader-member exchange (LMX) affect leader attention and decision-making. The model responds to calls for more work into the interplay between leaders and followers and the effect on leadership (Avolio, 2007; Howell & Shamir, 2005), the integration of top-down and bottom-up processes that affect attention (Ocasio, 2011; Rerup, 2009); and the types, tactics, targets, and outcomes of follower voice (Morrison, 2011). Twentyseven established leaders and their followers completed on-line instruments in a timelagged fashion. Leaders were asked to respond to common managerial issues based on the General Management In-Box, a well-known in-basket exercise (Joines, 2011). Each scenario was accompanied by advisory messages that varied in (1) LMX level of the follower sender and (2) promotive or prohibitive voice type (Liang, Farh, & Farh, 2012). Results show the quality of the relationship between the leader and the follower message sender influenced leader interest and decision-making directly and as a moderator of the path between follower voice type and leader decision-making. Regulatory focus did not moderate the relationship between follower voice and leader attention. Contrary to predictions, promotive voice (messages about opportunities) influenced leader attention and decisions more than prohibitive voice (messages about threats). The contributions of these findings to the follower, voice, attention, LMX, and regulatory focus literatures are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0784.
650 4 $a Behavior. $3 532476
650 4 $a Perceptions. $3 3435328
650 4 $a Managers. $2 gtt $3 1457937
650 4 $a Power. $3 518736
650 4 $a Personality. $3 516529
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Social construction. $3 3681355
650 4 $a 20th century. $3 1972782
650 4 $a Civil engineering. $3 860360
650 4 $a Engineering. $3 586835
690 $a 0543
690 $a 0537
690 $a 0454
710 2 $a The University of Western Ontario (Canada). $3 1017622
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-02B.
790 $a 0784
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29241646