東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Towards Knowledge Based Planning for...

Chalkley, Adam B.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Towards Knowledge Based Planning for CyberKnife®Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatments of Multiple Intracranial Metastases.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Towards Knowledge Based Planning for CyberKnife®Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatments of Multiple Intracranial Metastases./
作者:	Chalkley, Adam B.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	175 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-11A.
標題:	Nuclear physics. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31040169
ISBN:	9798382634531

Towards Knowledge Based Planning for CyberKnife®Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatments of Multiple Intracranial Metastases.
Chalkley, Adam B.

Towards Knowledge Based Planning for CyberKnife®Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatments of Multiple Intracranial Metastases. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 175 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Manchester (United Kingdom), 2023.

Background:Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is used to treat both solitary and multiple Brain Metastases (BM). Improvements in treatment efficacy for primary tumours increases BM incidence, placing greater demands on centres delivering SRS. Knowledge Based Planning (KBP) has been demonstrated as a method to reduce the time required for radiotherapy planning, and so may help elevate the additional burden on SRS services.Methods: Planning data from a dedicated SRS platform (Accuray Cyber: KnifeA®) audit database was used to train and assess a series of KBP models, predicting the volume of whole brain (excluding Planning Target Volume; PTV) receiving radionecrosis tolerance doses. Models were taken from literature, including Bohoudi et al. (2016), Cummins et al. (2020) and Yu et al. (2021). Additional models based on a power law dose fall-off from the lesion centre were also explored, including a power law shifted away from the PTV centre. 289 single and 381 multi-lesion cases were used for training, with 122 and 259 independent cases for testing. Assessment included 10-fold cross validation on the training data, for a range of error metrics such as the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). Model parameters learnt on single lesion cases were also applied to multiple BM cases; and finally voxelised variants of the power law models were created to assess the interaction between lesions.Results: For single lesions the MAPE from the training data cross validation (mean A± standard deviation) was 29 A± 6.9%, 23 A± 5.3%, 23 A± 6.0% and 22 A± 5.9% for Bohoudi et al. (2016), Cummins et al. (2020), Yu et al. (2021) and the shifted power law respectively; with errors of 37%, 22%, 21% and 20% for the test data. For multiple lesions, the MAPE was slightly lower at 20 A± 3.5%, 20 A± 3.8% and 20 A± 3.7% for Bohoudi et al. (2016), Yu et al. (2021) and the shifted power law; and 24%, 23% and 23% for the test data. The voxelised shifted power law model for multiple lesions had a MAPEof 18 A± 2.4% and 19% on the training and test data respectively. For some methods large errors occurred when applying single lesion parameters to multiple BM cases; for Bohoudi et al. (2016) the median MAPE [95% Confidence Interval] was 38 [32, 45]% for single lesion model coefficients compared to 23 [19, 26]% for multiple lesion learnt parameters.Conclusions:Separate models are required for both single and multiple lesion cases for Cyber: Knife treatments. The improvement derived from including lesion separation for these simple models is not sufficient to warrant the extra time required to acquire the information. Power law dose fall-off models were equivocal with other methods for Cyber: Knife, adding to existing evidence for this type of relationship, but further investigation is required.

ISBN: 9798382634531Subjects--Topical Terms:

517741
Nuclear physics.

Towards Knowledge Based Planning for CyberKnife®Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatments of Multiple Intracranial Metastases.
LDR:03960nmm a2200349 4500 001 2399022
005 20240909062220.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382634531
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31040169
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Manchester_UK13e9cc54-731c-4b25-a0b8-df8b20e09099
035 $a AAI31040169
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chalkley, Adam B. $3 3768991
245 1 0 $a Towards Knowledge Based Planning for CyberKnife®Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatments of Multiple Intracranial Metastases.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 175 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Hayes, Geoff.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Manchester (United Kingdom), 2023.
520 $a Background:Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is used to treat both solitary and multiple Brain Metastases (BM). Improvements in treatment efficacy for primary tumours increases BM incidence, placing greater demands on centres delivering SRS. Knowledge Based Planning (KBP) has been demonstrated as a method to reduce the time required for radiotherapy planning, and so may help elevate the additional burden on SRS services.Methods: Planning data from a dedicated SRS platform (Accuray Cyber: KnifeA®) audit database was used to train and assess a series of KBP models, predicting the volume of whole brain (excluding Planning Target Volume; PTV) receiving radionecrosis tolerance doses. Models were taken from literature, including Bohoudi et al. (2016), Cummins et al. (2020) and Yu et al. (2021). Additional models based on a power law dose fall-off from the lesion centre were also explored, including a power law shifted away from the PTV centre. 289 single and 381 multi-lesion cases were used for training, with 122 and 259 independent cases for testing. Assessment included 10-fold cross validation on the training data, for a range of error metrics such as the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). Model parameters learnt on single lesion cases were also applied to multiple BM cases; and finally voxelised variants of the power law models were created to assess the interaction between lesions.Results: For single lesions the MAPE from the training data cross validation (mean A± standard deviation) was 29 A± 6.9%, 23 A± 5.3%, 23 A± 6.0% and 22 A± 5.9% for Bohoudi et al. (2016), Cummins et al. (2020), Yu et al. (2021) and the shifted power law respectively; with errors of 37%, 22%, 21% and 20% for the test data. For multiple lesions, the MAPE was slightly lower at 20 A± 3.5%, 20 A± 3.8% and 20 A± 3.7% for Bohoudi et al. (2016), Yu et al. (2021) and the shifted power law; and 24%, 23% and 23% for the test data. The voxelised shifted power law model for multiple lesions had a MAPEof 18 A± 2.4% and 19% on the training and test data respectively. For some methods large errors occurred when applying single lesion parameters to multiple BM cases; for Bohoudi et al. (2016) the median MAPE [95% Confidence Interval] was 38 [32, 45]% for single lesion model coefficients compared to 23 [19, 26]% for multiple lesion learnt parameters.Conclusions:Separate models are required for both single and multiple lesion cases for Cyber: Knife treatments. The improvement derived from including lesion separation for these simple models is not sufficient to warrant the extra time required to acquire the information. Power law dose fall-off models were equivocal with other methods for Cyber: Knife, adding to existing evidence for this type of relationship, but further investigation is required.
590 $a School code: 1543.
650 4 $a Nuclear physics. $3 517741
650 4 $a Oncology. $3 751006
650 4 $a Therapy. $3 3343697
650 4 $a Prescriptions. $3 3768992
650 4 $a Mean square errors. $3 3562318
650 4 $a Metastasis. $3 818532
650 4 $a Radiosurgery. $3 1084362
650 4 $a Planning. $3 552734
650 4 $a Neural networks. $3 677449
650 4 $a Conformity. $3 565087
650 4 $a Dosimetry. $3 3687072
650 4 $a Radiation therapy. $3 3557731
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0756
690 $a 0992
690 $a 0212
710 2 $a The University of Manchester (United Kingdom). $3 3422292
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-11A.
790 $a 1543
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31040169