東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Apprenticeship as a Developmental Me...

Song, Yu.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Apprenticeship as a Developmental Mechanism in Argumentation Skill Development.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Apprenticeship as a Developmental Mechanism in Argumentation Skill Development./
Author:	Song, Yu.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
Description:	138 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-06B.
Subject:	Developmental psychology. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30813298
ISBN:	9798381184006

Apprenticeship as a Developmental Mechanism in Argumentation Skill Development.
Song, Yu.

Apprenticeship as a Developmental Mechanism in Argumentation Skill Development. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 138 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2024.

Argumentation is widely regarded as both a productive path and a critical objective of education. However, poor performance remains a serious problem at all ages in assessments of expository writing in which students are asked to make an argument in support of a claim. An apprenticeship model is proposed as a mechanism in the development of skill in dialogic argumentation, with this skill serving as a bridge to individual written argument. In a multi-week intervention, young adolescents were paired with a series of both more skilled and similarly skilled partners, anonymously, in conducting one-on-one electronic dialogs on controversial issues. A comparison group was included who engaged in the same intervention and assessments, but their dialogic partners were confined to similar ability peers. The more skilled adult partner displayed skilled forms of counterargument and use of evidence to support claims as well as frequent questioning with respect to the partner's statements and meta-talk about the discourse itself. Effects on students' individual argument skill on a new topic were assessed by means of both a (solitary) individually constructed dialog and an individual essay. In both the dialogs and essays, the experimental group showed greater skills in using evidence to support a claim, generating advanced counterarguments, and constructing integrative critical arguments coordinating two contrasting claims, relative to the comparison group. These results lend support to the power of apprenticeship in individual argument skill development. Both groups also advanced in individual dialogic argument skills following their engagement in argumentation, a result thereby demonstrating the passage of higher-order intellectual skills from a social to individual level. Besides their educational implications, the theoretical significance of these results in relation to both an apprenticeship model and a dialogical model of argument skill development was discussed.

ISBN: 9798381184006Subjects--Topical Terms:

516948
Developmental psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Apprenticeship

Apprenticeship as a Developmental Mechanism in Argumentation Skill Development.
LDR:03099nmm a2200373 4500 001 2398321
005 20240812064610.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798381184006
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30813298
035 $a AAI30813298
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Song, Yu. $3 1910854
245 1 0 $a Apprenticeship as a Developmental Mechanism in Argumentation Skill Development.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 138 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Kuhn, Deanna.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2024.
520 $a Argumentation is widely regarded as both a productive path and a critical objective of education. However, poor performance remains a serious problem at all ages in assessments of expository writing in which students are asked to make an argument in support of a claim. An apprenticeship model is proposed as a mechanism in the development of skill in dialogic argumentation, with this skill serving as a bridge to individual written argument. In a multi-week intervention, young adolescents were paired with a series of both more skilled and similarly skilled partners, anonymously, in conducting one-on-one electronic dialogs on controversial issues. A comparison group was included who engaged in the same intervention and assessments, but their dialogic partners were confined to similar ability peers. The more skilled adult partner displayed skilled forms of counterargument and use of evidence to support claims as well as frequent questioning with respect to the partner's statements and meta-talk about the discourse itself. Effects on students' individual argument skill on a new topic were assessed by means of both a (solitary) individually constructed dialog and an individual essay. In both the dialogs and essays, the experimental group showed greater skills in using evidence to support a claim, generating advanced counterarguments, and constructing integrative critical arguments coordinating two contrasting claims, relative to the comparison group. These results lend support to the power of apprenticeship in individual argument skill development. Both groups also advanced in individual dialogic argument skills following their engagement in argumentation, a result thereby demonstrating the passage of higher-order intellectual skills from a social to individual level. Besides their educational implications, the theoretical significance of these results in relation to both an apprenticeship model and a dialogical model of argument skill development was discussed.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Developmental psychology. $3 516948
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
653 $a Apprenticeship
653 $a Argumentation
653 $a Critical thinking
653 $a Meta-cognition
690 $a 0620
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b TC: Developmental Psychology. $3 3172490
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-06B.
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30813298