東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Clinical Reasoning Development: Expl...

Orrison, Ryan T.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Clinical Reasoning Development: Exploring the Role of Instructor Feedback During Health Professions Clinical Education Experiences.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Clinical Reasoning Development: Exploring the Role of Instructor Feedback During Health Professions Clinical Education Experiences./
作者:	Orrison, Ryan T.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	178 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-12B.
標題:	Health sciences. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31143477
ISBN:	9798382801315

Clinical Reasoning Development: Exploring the Role of Instructor Feedback During Health Professions Clinical Education Experiences.
Orrison, Ryan T.

Clinical Reasoning Development: Exploring the Role of Instructor Feedback During Health Professions Clinical Education Experiences. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 178 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northern Illinois University, 2024.

The growing complexity of the healthcare environment and the need to equitably address the health and well-being of a diverse patient population has increased the requirement for practical instruction and assessment of clinical reasoning in the training of health professionals. Formative assessment, in the form of feedback, is recognized as an essential instructional component in teaching clinical reasoning. This study aimed to investigate the role of feedback in developing clinical reasoning during clinical education.This investigation consisted of three unique studies completed in phases. The scoping review methodology in phase one revealed six themes from the included articles (n = 28) regarding the use of feedback in teaching and learning clinical reasoning. Phase two consisted of an electronic survey administered to 91 student physical therapists completing one of their final clinical experiences before graduation. The survey collected data about self-efficacy for clinical reasoning, student feedback orientation, and their perceptions of the quality and delivery of feedback. Relationships were identified between student feedback orientation (β = .663, t(85) = 4.21, p < .000), self-efficacy for using feedback (β = .355, t(90) = 4.21, p < .001) and their self-efficacy for clinical reasoning. In phase three, the researcher conducted a retrospective analysis using dyads (n = 1544) created using survey responses from student physical therapists (n = 395) and characteristics of clinical instructors. A small positive effect was seen in students' self-assessed clinical reasoning skills when paired with a Credentialed Clinical Instructor or board-certified specialist during clinical experiences (t(1538) = 2.38, p = .017). In sum, the findings from all three phases of this investigation provide insight into the role of feedback in clinical reasoning development, which can be used to inform future research.

ISBN: 9798382801315Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168359
Health sciences.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Clinical education

Clinical Reasoning Development: Exploring the Role of Instructor Feedback During Health Professions Clinical Education Experiences.
LDR:03199nmm a2200409 4500 001 2398197
005 20240812064402.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798382801315
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31143477
035 $a AAI31143477
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Orrison, Ryan T. $3 3768107
245 1 0 $a Clinical Reasoning Development: Exploring the Role of Instructor Feedback During Health Professions Clinical Education Experiences.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 178 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: McCarthy, Amanda K.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northern Illinois University, 2024.
520 $a The growing complexity of the healthcare environment and the need to equitably address the health and well-being of a diverse patient population has increased the requirement for practical instruction and assessment of clinical reasoning in the training of health professionals. Formative assessment, in the form of feedback, is recognized as an essential instructional component in teaching clinical reasoning. This study aimed to investigate the role of feedback in developing clinical reasoning during clinical education.This investigation consisted of three unique studies completed in phases. The scoping review methodology in phase one revealed six themes from the included articles (n = 28) regarding the use of feedback in teaching and learning clinical reasoning. Phase two consisted of an electronic survey administered to 91 student physical therapists completing one of their final clinical experiences before graduation. The survey collected data about self-efficacy for clinical reasoning, student feedback orientation, and their perceptions of the quality and delivery of feedback. Relationships were identified between student feedback orientation (β = .663, t(85) = 4.21, p < .000), self-efficacy for using feedback (β = .355, t(90) = 4.21, p < .001) and their self-efficacy for clinical reasoning. In phase three, the researcher conducted a retrospective analysis using dyads (n = 1544) created using survey responses from student physical therapists (n = 395) and characteristics of clinical instructors. A small positive effect was seen in students' self-assessed clinical reasoning skills when paired with a Credentialed Clinical Instructor or board-certified specialist during clinical experiences (t(1538) = 2.38, p = .017). In sum, the findings from all three phases of this investigation provide insight into the role of feedback in clinical reasoning development, which can be used to inform future research.
590 $a School code: 0162.
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
650 4 $a Physical therapy. $3 588713
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
653 $a Clinical education
653 $a Clinical reasoning
653 $a Feedback
653 $a Healthcare environment
653 $a Health professionals
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0382
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a Northern Illinois University. $b College of Health and Human Sciences. $3 3764252
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-12B.
790 $a 0162
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31143477