Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Examining the Perceptions of Fake Ne...
~
Gwynn, Brendan Patrick.
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Examining the Perceptions of Fake News, Verification, and Notices on Twitter.
Record Type:
Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Examining the Perceptions of Fake News, Verification, and Notices on Twitter./
Author:
Gwynn, Brendan Patrick.
Published:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
Description:
98 p.
Notes:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International84-02.
Subject:
Journalism. -
Online resource:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29222745
ISBN:
9798841529668
Examining the Perceptions of Fake News, Verification, and Notices on Twitter.
Gwynn, Brendan Patrick.
Examining the Perceptions of Fake News, Verification, and Notices on Twitter.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 98 p.
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02.
Thesis (M.A.)--Brigham Young University, 2022.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
The rise of social media platforms has had a significant impact on the conventional model of gatekeeping. With increased access to information--as well as the ability to contribute to the public discourse--individuals no longer need to rely on the mass media for news. These realities have led to increased conversations surrounding credibility in the digital age. Although not a new concept, fake news has become increasingly common in recent years. The web--particularly social media outlets, like Twitter--have enhanced the spread of misinformation. To combat this, social media platforms have introduced gatekeeping features like verification marks and warning labels. However, questions remain regarding the credibility and effectiveness of these features. Furthermore, little information exists regarding the perceptions of these features. For this study, the researcher examined the perceptions of fake news, verification, and Notices (i.e., warning labels) as they relate to Twitter. These perceptions were captured through a survey that was distributed to Twitter users through MTurk. Results were examined generally as well as in the light of political orientation, ranging from very liberal to very conservative on a 4-point scale. Within the scope and limitations of this study, results indicate that the majority of Twitter users believe that fake news on the platform is a major problem. Additionally, results show that there is no significant difference between the effectiveness of verification and the effectiveness of Notices in slowing the spread of fake news, and neither feature is perceived as strongly credible or effective.
ISBN: 9798841529668Subjects--Topical Terms:
576107
Journalism.
Examining the Perceptions of Fake News, Verification, and Notices on Twitter.
LDR
:02799nmm a2200385 4500
001
2397520
005
20240711091730.5
006
m o d
007
cr#unu||||||||
008
251215s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798841529668
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI29222745
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)BrighamYoung10451
035
$a
AAI29222745
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Gwynn, Brendan Patrick.
$3
3767299
245
1 0
$a
Examining the Perceptions of Fake News, Verification, and Notices on Twitter.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2022
300
$a
98 p.
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02.
500
$a
Advisor: Zurcher, Jessica;Church, Scott.
502
$a
Thesis (M.A.)--Brigham Young University, 2022.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
The rise of social media platforms has had a significant impact on the conventional model of gatekeeping. With increased access to information--as well as the ability to contribute to the public discourse--individuals no longer need to rely on the mass media for news. These realities have led to increased conversations surrounding credibility in the digital age. Although not a new concept, fake news has become increasingly common in recent years. The web--particularly social media outlets, like Twitter--have enhanced the spread of misinformation. To combat this, social media platforms have introduced gatekeeping features like verification marks and warning labels. However, questions remain regarding the credibility and effectiveness of these features. Furthermore, little information exists regarding the perceptions of these features. For this study, the researcher examined the perceptions of fake news, verification, and Notices (i.e., warning labels) as they relate to Twitter. These perceptions were captured through a survey that was distributed to Twitter users through MTurk. Results were examined generally as well as in the light of political orientation, ranging from very liberal to very conservative on a 4-point scale. Within the scope and limitations of this study, results indicate that the majority of Twitter users believe that fake news on the platform is a major problem. Additionally, results show that there is no significant difference between the effectiveness of verification and the effectiveness of Notices in slowing the spread of fake news, and neither feature is perceived as strongly credible or effective.
590
$a
School code: 0022.
650
4
$a
Journalism.
$3
576107
650
4
$a
Web 2.0.
$3
900397
650
4
$a
Internet.
$3
527226
650
4
$a
Perceptions.
$3
3435328
650
4
$a
Credibility.
$3
3560860
650
4
$a
Verbal communication.
$3
3560678
650
4
$a
Politics.
$3
685427
650
4
$a
Blogs.
$3
779530
650
4
$a
Censorship.
$3
572838
650
4
$a
User generated content.
$3
3562474
650
4
$a
False information.
$3
3564362
650
4
$a
Algorithms.
$3
536374
650
4
$a
Privacy.
$3
528582
650
4
$a
Popularity.
$3
3564342
650
4
$a
Social research.
$3
2122687
650
4
$a
Communication.
$3
524709
650
4
$a
Computer science.
$3
523869
650
4
$a
Political science.
$3
528916
650
4
$a
Web studies.
$3
2122754
690
$a
0391
690
$a
0344
690
$a
0459
690
$a
0984
690
$a
0615
690
$a
0646
710
2
$a
Brigham Young University.
$3
1017451
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
84-02.
790
$a
0022
791
$a
M.A.
792
$a
2022
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29222745
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9505840
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login