東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Teacher Leadership and Student Achie...

Woo, Hansol.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Teacher Leadership and Student Achievement in the United States and South Korea: Investigating the Role of Teacher Leadership in High-Poverty Schools.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Teacher Leadership and Student Achievement in the United States and South Korea: Investigating the Role of Teacher Leadership in High-Poverty Schools./
作者:	Woo, Hansol.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	112 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-03A.
標題:	Teaching. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28841755
ISBN:	9798460448142

Teacher Leadership and Student Achievement in the United States and South Korea: Investigating the Role of Teacher Leadership in High-Poverty Schools.
Woo, Hansol.

Teacher Leadership and Student Achievement in the United States and South Korea: Investigating the Role of Teacher Leadership in High-Poverty Schools. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 112 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Teacher leadership (TL) research has often failed to investigate equity and social justice as well as to consider national contexts and cultural differences. This study examines the relationship between TL and student achievement while investigating the moderating role of TL on the association between school poverty and student achievement in two countries (i.e., the United States and South Korea). TL is defined by two primary practices or activities: (a) supporting professional learning of peers (i.e., collaboration, cooperation) and (b) influencing school decisions (i.e., distributed leadership, decision-making responsibility). I address three research questions: (a) How are TL practices reported by teachers and their school principals in the US and Korea? (b) How are TL practices associated with differences in student achievement in the US and Korea? (c) Do the associations between school poverty and student achievement vary according to TL practices in the US and Korea? 　Using 2015 PISA data, I utilized hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to address the research questions and test specific hypotheses. The present study first found that the two TL practices (i.e., TL in peer learning and TL in school decisions) were weakly correlated to each other in both countries. Student achievement in the US was positively correlated with TL for school decisions (distributed leadership and decision-making responsibility), whereas student achievement in Korea was correlated to TL in peer learning (i.e., collaboration and cooperation). In addition, HLM analysis partially indicated that among the four different TL practices, only (budgeting- and curriculum-related) decision-making responsibility was statistically related to higher student achievement in the US. In Korea, collaboration (i.e., observing and providing feedback; joint activities) was negatively related to student achievement, while cooperation (i.e., exchanging teaching materials; ensuring common standards together; and attending team conferences). Furthermore, the results showed two significant patterns of the relationships among TL, student achievement, and school poverty. First, negative relationships between school poverty and student achievement were weaker in schools with a higher degree of TL (i.e., distributed leadership in the US, curricular decision-making responsibility in Korea). Second, the negative relationship between school poverty and student performance was great in schools with a higher degree of teacher collaboration in Korea. 　These findings have implications for theory and policy. First, these two major TL practices (i.e., TL in peer learning and TL in school decisions) that may be independent rather than interconnected concepts. Second, the conceptualization of TL should include the effects of educational systems and cultural contexts. Third, policymakers need to understand the different associations between TL practices and student achievement by country before formulating policy. Finally, a more valid and reliable database with elaborated measurement would enable future researchers to rigorously assess the relationships among TL, student achievement, and school poverty.

ISBN: 9798460448142Subjects--Topical Terms:

517098
Teaching.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Student achievement

Teacher Leadership and Student Achievement in the United States and South Korea: Investigating the Role of Teacher Leadership in High-Poverty Schools.
LDR:04526nmm a2200397 4500 001 2397020
005 20240617111716.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798460448142
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28841755
035 $a (MiAaPQ)PennState_24406huw187
035 $a AAI28841755
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Woo, Hansol. $3 3766785
245 1 0 $a Teacher Leadership and Student Achievement in the United States and South Korea: Investigating the Role of Teacher Leadership in High-Poverty Schools.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 112 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: LeTendre, Gerald.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Teacher leadership (TL) research has often failed to investigate equity and social justice as well as to consider national contexts and cultural differences. This study examines the relationship between TL and student achievement while investigating the moderating role of TL on the association between school poverty and student achievement in two countries (i.e., the United States and South Korea). TL is defined by two primary practices or activities: (a) supporting professional learning of peers (i.e., collaboration, cooperation) and (b) influencing school decisions (i.e., distributed leadership, decision-making responsibility). I address three research questions: (a) How are TL practices reported by teachers and their school principals in the US and Korea? (b) How are TL practices associated with differences in student achievement in the US and Korea? (c) Do the associations between school poverty and student achievement vary according to TL practices in the US and Korea? 　Using 2015 PISA data, I utilized hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to address the research questions and test specific hypotheses. The present study first found that the two TL practices (i.e., TL in peer learning and TL in school decisions) were weakly correlated to each other in both countries. Student achievement in the US was positively correlated with TL for school decisions (distributed leadership and decision-making responsibility), whereas student achievement in Korea was correlated to TL in peer learning (i.e., collaboration and cooperation). In addition, HLM analysis partially indicated that among the four different TL practices, only (budgeting- and curriculum-related) decision-making responsibility was statistically related to higher student achievement in the US. In Korea, collaboration (i.e., observing and providing feedback; joint activities) was negatively related to student achievement, while cooperation (i.e., exchanging teaching materials; ensuring common standards together; and attending team conferences). Furthermore, the results showed two significant patterns of the relationships among TL, student achievement, and school poverty. First, negative relationships between school poverty and student achievement were weaker in schools with a higher degree of TL (i.e., distributed leadership in the US, curricular decision-making responsibility in Korea). Second, the negative relationship between school poverty and student performance was great in schools with a higher degree of teacher collaboration in Korea. 　These findings have implications for theory and policy. First, these two major TL practices (i.e., TL in peer learning and TL in school decisions) that may be independent rather than interconnected concepts. Second, the conceptualization of TL should include the effects of educational systems and cultural contexts. Third, policymakers need to understand the different associations between TL practices and student achievement by country before formulating policy. Finally, a more valid and reliable database with elaborated measurement would enable future researchers to rigorously assess the relationships among TL, student achievement, and school poverty.
590 $a School code: 0176.
650 4 $a Teaching. $3 517098
650 4 $a Students. $3 756581
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
650 4 $a Curricula. $3 3422445
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 2122799
650 4 $a Educational sociology. $3 519608
653 $a Student achievement
653 $a Korea
653 $a Low-income schools
653 $a Teacher collaboration
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0340
710 2 $a The Pennsylvania State University. $3 699896
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-03A.
790 $a 0176
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28841755