東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

What's Cooking?: A Mixed Methods Stu...

Philippone, Lisa E.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

What's Cooking?: A Mixed Methods Study of Health Perceptions and Use of Improved Cookstoves in Rural India.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	What's Cooking?: A Mixed Methods Study of Health Perceptions and Use of Improved Cookstoves in Rural India./
Author:	Philippone, Lisa E.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
Description:	140 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International76-11.
Subject:	Public health. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1587551
ISBN:	9781321714777

What's Cooking?: A Mixed Methods Study of Health Perceptions and Use of Improved Cookstoves in Rural India.
Philippone, Lisa E.

What's Cooking?: A Mixed Methods Study of Health Perceptions and Use of Improved Cookstoves in Rural India. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 140 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11.

Thesis (M.S.)--Duke University, 2015.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The burning of biomass (wood, dung, charcoal, etc.) for cooking and heating is widespread throughout the world and is a major contributor to household air pollution (HAP). Biomass fuels are often burned in inefficient stoves and rooms with poor ventilation, contributing to respiratory illnesses, local deforestation, and global climate change. Improved cookstoves (ICS) are advocated as an effective remedy for the effects of HAP. In this study we examine attitudes associated with ICS and traditional stoves among households that purchased an ICS and households that did not. We employed a mixed-methods study between June 2012 and November 2014 in the Himalayan region of Uttarakhand, India. We conducted 2,038 household surveys and 28 in-depth interviews that included questions about environmental and stove-related perceptions, household socio-demographics, stove and fuel use, socio-economic characteristics, risk and time preferences and a 24-hour biomass fuel weighing exercise for monitoring of fuel consumption. This analysis focused on 1) cooking practices 2) stove and fuel use 3) positive and negative attributes of ICS and traditional stoves 4) perceptions of health changes from use of ICS and 5) knowledge of local diseases and health. Quantitative analysis consisted of multivariable logistic regressions with survey data and qualitative analysis employed applied thematic analysis of transcripts from primary cook interviews. More than half of all households in the qualitative sample reported belief that there is no health impact from using an ICS. Smoke from traditional stoves is considered a normal aspect of daily life. Misconceptions of local diseases, causes, and cures are pervasive and impact perceptions of health. Female respondents were most likely to comment on smoke as unsafe for their health and the cleaning requirement for their traditional stove as a negative feature. Respondents complaining of ICS fuel cost (including electricity bill) and relative wealth of the household were significantly related. It is clear that households subjected to this stove promotion campaign remained unconvinced that smoke from cooking is an important threat to health. Therefore, we must target households using strong educational campaigns about the effects of smoke in the home, making clear that smoke does not have to be a normal aspect of daily life, and is a health threat that can be eliminated. Wide variation exists among ICS users and their reasons for using or not using the ICS, which suggests the need for additional research on preferences and perceptions before scaling up or implementing similar ICS interventions in this region. Future cookstove intervention programs will benefit from this improved understanding and help inform more effective design of future programs to enhance sustained use of ICS.

ISBN: 9781321714777Subjects--Topical Terms:

534748
Public health.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Improved cookstove

What's Cooking?: A Mixed Methods Study of Health Perceptions and Use of Improved Cookstoves in Rural India.
LDR:04063nmm a2200385 4500 001 2397014
005 20240617111714.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321714777
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1587551
035 $a (MiAaPQ)duke:12950
035 $a AAI1587551
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Philippone, Lisa E. $3 3766779
245 1 0 $a What's Cooking?: A Mixed Methods Study of Health Perceptions and Use of Improved Cookstoves in Rural India.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 140 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Jeuland, Marc.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Duke University, 2015.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The burning of biomass (wood, dung, charcoal, etc.) for cooking and heating is widespread throughout the world and is a major contributor to household air pollution (HAP). Biomass fuels are often burned in inefficient stoves and rooms with poor ventilation, contributing to respiratory illnesses, local deforestation, and global climate change. Improved cookstoves (ICS) are advocated as an effective remedy for the effects of HAP. In this study we examine attitudes associated with ICS and traditional stoves among households that purchased an ICS and households that did not. We employed a mixed-methods study between June 2012 and November 2014 in the Himalayan region of Uttarakhand, India. We conducted 2,038 household surveys and 28 in-depth interviews that included questions about environmental and stove-related perceptions, household socio-demographics, stove and fuel use, socio-economic characteristics, risk and time preferences and a 24-hour biomass fuel weighing exercise for monitoring of fuel consumption. This analysis focused on 1) cooking practices 2) stove and fuel use 3) positive and negative attributes of ICS and traditional stoves 4) perceptions of health changes from use of ICS and 5) knowledge of local diseases and health. Quantitative analysis consisted of multivariable logistic regressions with survey data and qualitative analysis employed applied thematic analysis of transcripts from primary cook interviews. More than half of all households in the qualitative sample reported belief that there is no health impact from using an ICS. Smoke from traditional stoves is considered a normal aspect of daily life. Misconceptions of local diseases, causes, and cures are pervasive and impact perceptions of health. Female respondents were most likely to comment on smoke as unsafe for their health and the cleaning requirement for their traditional stove as a negative feature. Respondents complaining of ICS fuel cost (including electricity bill) and relative wealth of the household were significantly related. It is clear that households subjected to this stove promotion campaign remained unconvinced that smoke from cooking is an important threat to health. Therefore, we must target households using strong educational campaigns about the effects of smoke in the home, making clear that smoke does not have to be a normal aspect of daily life, and is a health threat that can be eliminated. Wide variation exists among ICS users and their reasons for using or not using the ICS, which suggests the need for additional research on preferences and perceptions before scaling up or implementing similar ICS interventions in this region. Future cookstove intervention programs will benefit from this improved understanding and help inform more effective design of future programs to enhance sustained use of ICS.
590 $a School code: 0066.
650 4 $a Public health. $3 534748
650 4 $a Environmental health. $3 543032
650 4 $a South Asian studies. $3 3172880
653 $a Improved cookstove
653 $a Indoor air pollution
690 $a 0470
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0638
710 2 $a Duke University. $b Global Health. $3 2092989
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 76-11.
790 $a 0066
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1587551