東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Form and Function: A Contribution to...

Russell, E. S.,

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology // E. S Russell.
作者:	Russell, E. S.,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (591 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-05B.
標題:	Science history. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27709825
ISBN:	9781392620397

Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology /
Russell, E. S.,

Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology /E. S Russell. - 1 electronic resource (591 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: B.

This book is not intended to be a full or detailed history of animal morphology: a complete account is given neither of morphological discoveries nor of morphological theories. My aim has been rather to call attention to the existence of diverse typical attitudes to the problems of form, and to trace the interplay of the theories that have arisen out of them. The main currents of morphological thought are to my mind three-the functional or synthetic, the formal or transcendental, and the materialistic or disintegrative. The first is associated with the great names of Aristotle, Cuvier, and von Baer, and leads easily to the more open vitalism of Lamarck and Samuel Butler. The typical representative of the second attitude is E. Geoffroy St Hilaire, and this habit of thought has greatly influenced the development of evolutionary morphology. The main battle-ground of these two opposing tendencies is the problem of the relation of function to form. Is function the mechanical result of form, or is form merely the manifestation of function or activity? What is the essence of life-organisation or activity? The materialistic attitude is not distinctively biological, but is common to practically all fields of thought. It dates back to the Greek atomists, and the triumph of mechanical science in the 19th century has induced many to accept materialism as the only possible scientific method. In biology it is more akin to the formal than to the functional attitude. In the course of this book I have not hidden my own sympathy with the functional attitude. It appears to me probable that more insight will be gained into the real nature of life and organisation by concentrating on the active response of the animal, as manifested both in behaviour and in morphogenesis, particularly in the post-embryonic stages, than by giving attention exclusively to the historical aspect of structure, as is the custom of "pure morphology." I believe we shall only make progress in this direction if we frankly adopt the simple everyday conception of living things-which many of us have had drilled out of us-that they are active, purposeful agents, not mere complicated aggregations of protein and other substances. Such an attitude is probably quite as sound philosophically as the opposing one, but I have not in this place attempted any justification of it. I have touched very lightly upon the controversy between vitalism and materialism which has been revived with the early years of the present century. It hardly lends itself as yet to historical treatment, and I could hardly hope to maintain with regard to it that objective attitude which should characterise the historian. The main result I hope to have achieved with this book is the demonstration, tentative and incomplete as it is, of the essential continuity of animal morphology from the days of Aristotle down to our own time. It is unfortunately true that modern biology, perhaps in consequence of the great advances it has made in certain directions, has to a considerable extent lost its historical consciousness, and if this book helps in any degree to counteract this tendency so far as animal morphology is concerned, it will have served its purpose.

English

ISBN: 9781392620397Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144850
Science history.

Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology /
LDR:04369nmm a22003493i 4500 001 2396100
005 20250522083148.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 251215s1921 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9781392620397
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI27709825
035 $a (MiAaPQD)DIS000547_10009876
035 $a AAI27709825
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Russell, E. S., $e author. $3 3765644
245 1 0 $a Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology / $c E. S Russell.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 1921
300 $a 1 electronic resource (591 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: B.
502 $b D.Sc. $c University of Glasgow (United Kingdom) $d 1921.
520 $a This book is not intended to be a full or detailed history of animal morphology: a complete account is given neither of morphological discoveries nor of morphological theories. My aim has been rather to call attention to the existence of diverse typical attitudes to the problems of form, and to trace the interplay of the theories that have arisen out of them. The main currents of morphological thought are to my mind three-the functional or synthetic, the formal or transcendental, and the materialistic or disintegrative. The first is associated with the great names of Aristotle, Cuvier, and von Baer, and leads easily to the more open vitalism of Lamarck and Samuel Butler. The typical representative of the second attitude is E. Geoffroy St Hilaire, and this habit of thought has greatly influenced the development of evolutionary morphology. The main battle-ground of these two opposing tendencies is the problem of the relation of function to form. Is function the mechanical result of form, or is form merely the manifestation of function or activity? What is the essence of life-organisation or activity? The materialistic attitude is not distinctively biological, but is common to practically all fields of thought. It dates back to the Greek atomists, and the triumph of mechanical science in the 19th century has induced many to accept materialism as the only possible scientific method. In biology it is more akin to the formal than to the functional attitude. In the course of this book I have not hidden my own sympathy with the functional attitude. It appears to me probable that more insight will be gained into the real nature of life and organisation by concentrating on the active response of the animal, as manifested both in behaviour and in morphogenesis, particularly in the post-embryonic stages, than by giving attention exclusively to the historical aspect of structure, as is the custom of "pure morphology." I believe we shall only make progress in this direction if we frankly adopt the simple everyday conception of living things-which many of us have had drilled out of us-that they are active, purposeful agents, not mere complicated aggregations of protein and other substances. Such an attitude is probably quite as sound philosophically as the opposing one, but I have not in this place attempted any justification of it. I have touched very lightly upon the controversy between vitalism and materialism which has been revived with the early years of the present century. It hardly lends itself as yet to historical treatment, and I could hardly hope to maintain with regard to it that objective attitude which should characterise the historian. The main result I hope to have achieved with this book is the demonstration, tentative and incomplete as it is, of the essential continuity of animal morphology from the days of Aristotle down to our own time. It is unfortunately true that modern biology, perhaps in consequence of the great advances it has made in certain directions, has to a considerable extent lost its historical consciousness, and if this book helps in any degree to counteract this tendency so far as animal morphology is concerned, it will have served its purpose.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0547
650 4 $a Science history. $3 2144850
650 4 $a Morphology. $3 591167
690 $a 0585
690 $a 0287
710 2 $a University of Glasgow (United Kingdom). $b Department Not Provided. $e degree granting institution. $3 3765645
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-05B.
790 $a 0547
791 $a D.Sc.
792 $a 1921
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27709825