東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Communism in the Institute of Pacifi...

Dubiel, Louis S.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Communism in the Institute of Pacific Relations.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Communism in the Institute of Pacific Relations./
作者:	Dubiel, Louis S.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 1954,
面頁冊數:	141 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-11.
標題:	American history. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28559131
ISBN:	9798728255727

Communism in the Institute of Pacific Relations.
Dubiel, Louis S.

Communism in the Institute of Pacific Relations. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 1954 - 141 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11.

Thesis (M.A.)--Canisius College, 1954.

In November of 1933 President Roosevelt formally recognized the Russian government. The Russian Commissar for Foreign Affairs, Maxim Litvinoff, gave formal assurances that Russia would refrain from Communist propaganda in America. The Russians, however, had no intention of keeping this promise. They tried and did place many people in key organizations and various posts in the State Department who were sympathetic to the Communistic cause. By these means they wanted to form American Foreign Policy so as to make it a tool of Soviet world domination.That America was able to check these influences before they brought about the total annihilation of this country and the remainder of the free world is a credit to the American people; for they finally realized that'. the Communists mean to enslave the free world. The Hearings on the Institute of Pacific Relations conducted by the McCarran Committee make it lucidly clear that the Communists were very effective in shaping American Far Eastern Policy along Soviet lines. This was the essential purpose of the committee; "to determine the extent to which subversive forces may have influenced or sought to influence the formulation and execution of our Far Eastern Policy.The officials of the Institute of Pacific Relations used its prestige to promote the interests of the Soviet Union in the United States. There is no doubt that Institute of Pacific Relations officials and the Institute of Pacific Relations itself were the vehicles used by the Communists to mold American Far Eastern Policies toward Communist objectives. Many of the persons active in and around the Institute of Pacific Relations and in particular though not exclusively Owen Lattimore, Edward Carter, Frederick V. Field, T. A. Bission, Lawrence E. Rossinger, and Maxwell Stewart knowingly and deliberately used the language of books and articles which they wrote or edited to influence the American public and the American State Department by means of pro-Communist or pro-Soviet content of such writings.The evidence is presented; the facts are clear. The Institute of Pacific Relations was a Communist instrument used and directed by the Soviets. It now remains to the American public and the American judicial system to see that justice is done. For if democracy is to live it must be rid of these Communistic influences. Democracy and Communism are opposing philosophies of life. Both cannot live together. One must fall or be destroyed. Let us hope that Democracy will be the philosophy of life which will triumph.

ISBN: 9798728255727Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122692
American history.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Communism

Communism in the Institute of Pacific Relations.
LDR:03611nmm a2200373 4500 001 2395869
005 20240531084155.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s1954 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798728255727
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28559131
035 $a (MiAaPQ)DISS2107_00575
035 $a AAI28559131
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Dubiel, Louis S. $3 3765378
245 1 0 $a Communism in the Institute of Pacific Relations.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 1954
300 $a 141 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Canisius College, 1954.
520 $a In November of 1933 President Roosevelt formally recognized the Russian government. The Russian Commissar for Foreign Affairs, Maxim Litvinoff, gave formal assurances that Russia would refrain from Communist propaganda in America. The Russians, however, had no intention of keeping this promise. They tried and did place many people in key organizations and various posts in the State Department who were sympathetic to the Communistic cause. By these means they wanted to form American Foreign Policy so as to make it a tool of Soviet world domination.That America was able to check these influences before they brought about the total annihilation of this country and the remainder of the free world is a credit to the American people; for they finally realized that'. the Communists mean to enslave the free world. The Hearings on the Institute of Pacific Relations conducted by the McCarran Committee make it lucidly clear that the Communists were very effective in shaping American Far Eastern Policy along Soviet lines. This was the essential purpose of the committee; "to determine the extent to which subversive forces may have influenced or sought to influence the formulation and execution of our Far Eastern Policy.The officials of the Institute of Pacific Relations used its prestige to promote the interests of the Soviet Union in the United States. There is no doubt that Institute of Pacific Relations officials and the Institute of Pacific Relations itself were the vehicles used by the Communists to mold American Far Eastern Policies toward Communist objectives. Many of the persons active in and around the Institute of Pacific Relations and in particular though not exclusively Owen Lattimore, Edward Carter, Frederick V. Field, T. A. Bission, Lawrence E. Rossinger, and Maxwell Stewart knowingly and deliberately used the language of books and articles which they wrote or edited to influence the American public and the American State Department by means of pro-Communist or pro-Soviet content of such writings.The evidence is presented; the facts are clear. The Institute of Pacific Relations was a Communist instrument used and directed by the Soviets. It now remains to the American public and the American judicial system to see that justice is done. For if democracy is to live it must be rid of these Communistic influences. Democracy and Communism are opposing philosophies of life. Both cannot live together. One must fall or be destroyed. Let us hope that Democracy will be the philosophy of life which will triumph.
590 $a School code: 2107.
650 4 $a American history. $3 2122692
650 4 $a History. $3 516518
653 $a Communism
653 $a Institute of Pacific Relations
653 $a Russian relations
653 $a Far eastern policy
690 $a 0578
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0337
710 2 $a Canisius College. $3 3765379
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-11.
790 $a 2107
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 1954
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28559131