東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Examining Theoretical Correlates of ...

Krushas, Amber E.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Examining Theoretical Correlates of Personal Recurrent Victimization in Adulthood.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Examining Theoretical Correlates of Personal Recurrent Victimization in Adulthood./
作者:	Krushas, Amber E.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	386 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-12A.
標題:	Criminology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30525253
ISBN:	9798379740979

Examining Theoretical Correlates of Personal Recurrent Victimization in Adulthood.
Krushas, Amber E.

Examining Theoretical Correlates of Personal Recurrent Victimization in Adulthood. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 386 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Nebraska at Omaha, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Considering prior research that has established exposure to recurrent victimization (i.e., experiencing more than one victimization) can predict substantial and ongoing mental, physical, financial, social, and legal harm, a robust understanding surrounding what may make someone more vulnerable to these experiences is critical. Despite this need, however, victimological research has yet to develop a comprehensive understanding surrounding what may increase vulnerability to recurrent victimization and how recurrent victims may differ from non-victims and those who experience a single victimization. In this context, the goal of the current study was to advance existing knowledge on what predicts different forms of recurrent victimization, when controlling for multiple theoretically relevant factors. Several victimological frameworks (i.e., "risky" lifestyle factors, individual traits, and target congruence theory indicators) were assessed collectively to predict recurrent, repeat, and poly-victimization compared to non-victimization and single victimization. Specifically, secondary data from a 2022 YouGov survey administered to 1,700 adults in the general population was used to assess these theoretical correlates across six forms of personal victimization. Results demonstrate consistent support for lifestyle factors, individual traits, and target congruence factors in identifying predictors that distinguish those who experienced more than one victimization from those who experienced no victimization and from those who experienced single victimization. Some frameworks (i.e., "risky" lifestyles, target vulnerability) were better able to predict these forms of recurrent victimization than others. Beyond this, certain indicators (i.e., using substances more frequently, having a higher adverse childhood experiences [ACE] score, being younger, being Black, being Hispanic, having a disability) consistently distinguished recurrent, repeat, and poly-victims from non-victims and single victims. Finally, having a disability was more often a distinguishing factor between recurrent, repeat, and poly-victimization and single victimization than recurrent, repeat, and poly-victimization and non-victimization, indicating that disability status may be especially important in explaining these ongoing harms. As the first study to identify that each of these frameworks can work collectively to further our understanding of these experiences, findings provide valuable insights into which theoretical factors may be important in differentiating recurrent victims from single victims and non-victims.

ISBN: 9798379740979Subjects--Topical Terms:

533274
Criminology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Multiple victimization

Examining Theoretical Correlates of Personal Recurrent Victimization in Adulthood.
LDR:03819nmm a2200373 4500 001 2395225
005 20240517100404.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798379740979
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30525253
035 $a AAI30525253
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Krushas, Amber E. $3 3764725
245 1 0 $a Examining Theoretical Correlates of Personal Recurrent Victimization in Adulthood.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 386 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Kulig, Teresa C.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Nebraska at Omaha, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Considering prior research that has established exposure to recurrent victimization (i.e., experiencing more than one victimization) can predict substantial and ongoing mental, physical, financial, social, and legal harm, a robust understanding surrounding what may make someone more vulnerable to these experiences is critical. Despite this need, however, victimological research has yet to develop a comprehensive understanding surrounding what may increase vulnerability to recurrent victimization and how recurrent victims may differ from non-victims and those who experience a single victimization. In this context, the goal of the current study was to advance existing knowledge on what predicts different forms of recurrent victimization, when controlling for multiple theoretically relevant factors. Several victimological frameworks (i.e., "risky" lifestyle factors, individual traits, and target congruence theory indicators) were assessed collectively to predict recurrent, repeat, and poly-victimization compared to non-victimization and single victimization. Specifically, secondary data from a 2022 YouGov survey administered to 1,700 adults in the general population was used to assess these theoretical correlates across six forms of personal victimization. Results demonstrate consistent support for lifestyle factors, individual traits, and target congruence factors in identifying predictors that distinguish those who experienced more than one victimization from those who experienced no victimization and from those who experienced single victimization. Some frameworks (i.e., "risky" lifestyles, target vulnerability) were better able to predict these forms of recurrent victimization than others. Beyond this, certain indicators (i.e., using substances more frequently, having a higher adverse childhood experiences [ACE] score, being younger, being Black, being Hispanic, having a disability) consistently distinguished recurrent, repeat, and poly-victims from non-victims and single victims. Finally, having a disability was more often a distinguishing factor between recurrent, repeat, and poly-victimization and single victimization than recurrent, repeat, and poly-victimization and non-victimization, indicating that disability status may be especially important in explaining these ongoing harms. As the first study to identify that each of these frameworks can work collectively to further our understanding of these experiences, findings provide valuable insights into which theoretical factors may be important in differentiating recurrent victims from single victims and non-victims.
590 $a School code: 1060.
650 4 $a Criminology. $3 533274
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
653 $a Multiple victimization
653 $a Poly-victimization
653 $a Recurrent victimization
653 $a Repeat victimization
690 $a 0627
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a University of Nebraska at Omaha. $b Criminal Justice. $3 1017784
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-12A.
790 $a 1060
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30525253