東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Effects of Neuroimaging on Juror Dec...

Hemingway, Samantha L.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effects of Neuroimaging on Juror Decisions in a Capital Trial.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Effects of Neuroimaging on Juror Decisions in a Capital Trial./
Author:	Hemingway, Samantha L.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
Description:	171 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-03A.
Subject:	Neurosciences. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29319141
ISBN:	9798841538530

Effects of Neuroimaging on Juror Decisions in a Capital Trial.
Hemingway, Samantha L.

Effects of Neuroimaging on Juror Decisions in a Capital Trial. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 171 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The present study examined the impact of neuroimaging evidence on juror decisions in a capital trial. Mock jurors (N = 257) were randomly assigned to one of eight conditions varied by neuroimaging (present or absent), area of neuroanatomical damage (prefrontal cortex [PFC] or limbic), and obviousness of damage (obvious or non-obvious), then asked to provide a sentencing recommendation (life imprisonment or death penalty) and rate their impressions of the defendant. Hypotheses were informed by the story model of jury decision-making, theories of the power of visual images, and research on the cognitive demand of death. Relationships between jurors' punishment orientations and legal decisions were also investigated. Results suggest that obviousness and area of damage impact juror decisions; however, neuroimages appear to have minimal independent effect. This study contributes to a growing understanding of how neuroimaging variables influence jurors' perceptions and punishment of a capital defendant with brain damage. Overall, the present study has important practical implications for legal professionals and society at large.

ISBN: 9798841538530Subjects--Topical Terms:

588700
Neurosciences.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Capital trial

Effects of Neuroimaging on Juror Decisions in a Capital Trial.
LDR:02375nmm a2200409 4500 001 2395183
005 20240517100353.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798841538530
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29319141
035 $a AAI29319141
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hemingway, Samantha L. $3 3764684
245 1 0 $a Effects of Neuroimaging on Juror Decisions in a Capital Trial.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 171 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Jacquin, Kristine M.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The present study examined the impact of neuroimaging evidence on juror decisions in a capital trial. Mock jurors (N = 257) were randomly assigned to one of eight conditions varied by neuroimaging (present or absent), area of neuroanatomical damage (prefrontal cortex [PFC] or limbic), and obviousness of damage (obvious or non-obvious), then asked to provide a sentencing recommendation (life imprisonment or death penalty) and rate their impressions of the defendant. Hypotheses were informed by the story model of jury decision-making, theories of the power of visual images, and research on the cognitive demand of death. Relationships between jurors' punishment orientations and legal decisions were also investigated. Results suggest that obviousness and area of damage impact juror decisions; however, neuroimages appear to have minimal independent effect. This study contributes to a growing understanding of how neuroimaging variables influence jurors' perceptions and punishment of a capital defendant with brain damage. Overall, the present study has important practical implications for legal professionals and society at large.
590 $a School code: 1503.
650 4 $a Neurosciences. $3 588700
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Medical imaging. $3 3172799
653 $a Capital trial
653 $a Death penalty
653 $a Jury decison-making
653 $a Neuroimaging
653 $a Neuroscience
653 $a Story model
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0574
690 $a 0317
710 2 $a Fielding Graduate University. $b The School of Psychology. $3 1669722
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-03A.
790 $a 1503
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29319141