東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Model for Measuring U.S. Army Warfig...

Ladson, Danita K.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Model for Measuring U.S. Army Warfighter's Critical Thinking Skills: A Meta-Analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Model for Measuring U.S. Army Warfighter's Critical Thinking Skills: A Meta-Analysis./
作者:	Ladson, Danita K.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2024,
面頁冊數:	202 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-06A.
標題:	Educational evaluation. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30815403
ISBN:	9798381144444

Model for Measuring U.S. Army Warfighter's Critical Thinking Skills: A Meta-Analysis.
Ladson, Danita K.

Model for Measuring U.S. Army Warfighter's Critical Thinking Skills: A Meta-Analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024 - 202 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2024.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The United States Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff declared critical thinking as a capability imperative for Force XXI. He directed Military Services to develop critical thinkers. There is limited evidence of success in terms of developing critical thinking abilities. Specifically, the U.S. Army lacks a single, generally accepted, codified method for assessing warfighters' critical thinking skills. Using a quantitative approach with a meta-analysis design, this study aimed to examine the extent to which common components of higher-level thinking (remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating) contribute to developing junior and mid-level learners' critical thinking abilities. Bloom's revised taxonomy model served as the theoretical framework for this research study. Random purposeful sampling was employed. Primary studies identified during the literature search were coded using a preset criterion, yielding 13 qualified studies. Subsequent statistical analyses yielded a medium positive effect size of 0.501 (SE = 0.125, 95% CI = 0.256 to 0.747), confirming that the higher-level thinking features contribute to developing critical thinking skills and are generally effective for creating a critical thinking skills assessment strategy. Heterogeneity results indicated that the variance in effect size cannot be confidently attributed to sampling error (Q = 289.931, df = 39, p = 0.001). The study's outcome offers the U.S. Army and military discrete, structured features most efficacious in evaluating the warfighters' critical thinking abilities. This stance promotes positive social change by informing the U.S. Army of an opportunity to advance the armed forces' cognitive readiness to maintain the nation's defense and fulfill national security requirements.

ISBN: 9798381144444Subjects--Topical Terms:

526425
Educational evaluation.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Assessing warfighters' critical thinking skills

Model for Measuring U.S. Army Warfighter's Critical Thinking Skills: A Meta-Analysis.
LDR:03146nmm a2200421 4500 001 2395128
005 20240513060826.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2024 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798381144444
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30815403
035 $a AAI30815403
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ladson, Danita K. $3 3764632
245 1 0 $a Model for Measuring U.S. Army Warfighter's Critical Thinking Skills: A Meta-Analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 202 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Allwright, Janine J.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Walden University, 2024.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The United States Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff declared critical thinking as a capability imperative for Force XXI. He directed Military Services to develop critical thinkers. There is limited evidence of success in terms of developing critical thinking abilities. Specifically, the U.S. Army lacks a single, generally accepted, codified method for assessing warfighters' critical thinking skills. Using a quantitative approach with a meta-analysis design, this study aimed to examine the extent to which common components of higher-level thinking (remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating) contribute to developing junior and mid-level learners' critical thinking abilities. Bloom's revised taxonomy model served as the theoretical framework for this research study. Random purposeful sampling was employed. Primary studies identified during the literature search were coded using a preset criterion, yielding 13 qualified studies. Subsequent statistical analyses yielded a medium positive effect size of 0.501 (SE = 0.125, 95% CI = 0.256 to 0.747), confirming that the higher-level thinking features contribute to developing critical thinking skills and are generally effective for creating a critical thinking skills assessment strategy. Heterogeneity results indicated that the variance in effect size cannot be confidently attributed to sampling error (Q = 289.931, df = 39, p = 0.001). The study's outcome offers the U.S. Army and military discrete, structured features most efficacious in evaluating the warfighters' critical thinking abilities. This stance promotes positive social change by informing the U.S. Army of an opportunity to advance the armed forces' cognitive readiness to maintain the nation's defense and fulfill national security requirements.
590 $a School code: 0543.
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
653 $a Assessing warfighters' critical thinking skills
653 $a Cognitive skills
653 $a Critical thinking
653 $a Higher level thinking features
653 $a Measuring critical thinking skills
653 $a Army
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0750
710 2 $a Walden University. $b Public Policy and Administration. $3 1026795
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-06A.
790 $a 0543
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30815403