東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Universal Assessment of Early Readin...

Abercrombie, Laura Johnson.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Universal Assessment of Early Reading Ability in Title I Schools.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Universal Assessment of Early Reading Ability in Title I Schools./
作者:	Abercrombie, Laura Johnson.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	90 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-06B.
標題:	Special education. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30696224
ISBN:	9798381095777

Universal Assessment of Early Reading Ability in Title I Schools.
Abercrombie, Laura Johnson.

Universal Assessment of Early Reading Ability in Title I Schools. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 90 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Valdosta State University, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Identifying at-risk readers in early grades is an ongoing challenge for educators, especially those in Title I schools where environmental and economic disadvantages may negatively impact students' reading ability. The purpose of the current study was to compare methods of identifying at-risk readers in kindergarten through third grade in Title I schools. This study was conducted in two Title I elementary schools using Acadience Reading Diagnostic to measure reading achievement and growth in students with reading disabilities, students at risk of reading disabilities, and typically reading students.Reading composite scores (RCS) were significantly different between the typical group and each of the other two groups (at-risk and identified groups) at all grade levels. Growth rate classifications were significant between groups only for kindergarten and first-grade participants. Among the three risk identification methods, there was fair agreement between low-achievement (LA) and low-growth (LG) methods and moderate agreement between dual-discrepancy (DD) and the other two methods. RCS means were found to be significantly lower than published norms. Growth rate classification means also fell significantly below published norms except for participants in first grade. Application of the LA and DD methods to local norms resulted in the identification of fewer than half the number of at-risk participants compared to published norms.The dual discrepancy method was recommended to identify at-risk readers in these grades because both achievement scores and growth rates were significantly different among kindergarten and first-grade groups. Due to a large number of participants identified as at-risk based on the use of published norms and the lack of significant difference in growth rates among groups in second and third grade, it was recommended that the LA method based on local norms be used to identify at-risk readers in second and third grades.

ISBN: 9798381095777Subjects--Topical Terms:

516693
Special education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Reading diagnostic

Universal Assessment of Early Reading Ability in Title I Schools.
LDR:03185nmm a2200397 4500 001 2395108
005 20240513060822.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798381095777
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30696224
035 $a AAI30696224
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Abercrombie, Laura Johnson. $3 3764610
245 1 0 $a Universal Assessment of Early Reading Ability in Title I Schools.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 90 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-06, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Lamb, Katherine.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Valdosta State University, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Identifying at-risk readers in early grades is an ongoing challenge for educators, especially those in Title I schools where environmental and economic disadvantages may negatively impact students' reading ability. The purpose of the current study was to compare methods of identifying at-risk readers in kindergarten through third grade in Title I schools. This study was conducted in two Title I elementary schools using Acadience Reading Diagnostic to measure reading achievement and growth in students with reading disabilities, students at risk of reading disabilities, and typically reading students.Reading composite scores (RCS) were significantly different between the typical group and each of the other two groups (at-risk and identified groups) at all grade levels. Growth rate classifications were significant between groups only for kindergarten and first-grade participants. Among the three risk identification methods, there was fair agreement between low-achievement (LA) and low-growth (LG) methods and moderate agreement between dual-discrepancy (DD) and the other two methods. RCS means were found to be significantly lower than published norms. Growth rate classification means also fell significantly below published norms except for participants in first grade. Application of the LA and DD methods to local norms resulted in the identification of fewer than half the number of at-risk participants compared to published norms.The dual discrepancy method was recommended to identify at-risk readers in these grades because both achievement scores and growth rates were significantly different among kindergarten and first-grade groups. Due to a large number of participants identified as at-risk based on the use of published norms and the lack of significant difference in growth rates among groups in second and third grade, it was recommended that the LA method based on local norms be used to identify at-risk readers in second and third grades.
590 $a School code: 1462.
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 520446
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 543687
653 $a Reading diagnostic
653 $a Elementary schools
653 $a Dual-discrepancy
653 $a Reading composite scores
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0460
690 $a 0201
690 $a 0524
710 2 $a Valdosta State University. $b Communication Sciences and Disorders. $3 3428617
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-06B.
790 $a 1462
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30696224