東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

An Analytical Integrative Review of ...

Griffith, Coralie A. J.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An Analytical Integrative Review of the Self-Determination Construct in Children with Disabilities.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	An Analytical Integrative Review of the Self-Determination Construct in Children with Disabilities./
Author:	Griffith, Coralie A. J.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
Description:	155 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-10A.
Subject:	Special education. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30420178
ISBN:	9798379421076

An Analytical Integrative Review of the Self-Determination Construct in Children with Disabilities.
Griffith, Coralie A. J.

An Analytical Integrative Review of the Self-Determination Construct in Children with Disabilities. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 155 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Regent University, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Despite changes in laws and access to education, individuals with disabilities continue to have fewer positive postsecondary outcomes than their non-disabled peers (Shogren et al., 2015). Negative secondary and postsecondary outcomes for individuals with disabilities include failure to graduate from high school, lack of postsecondary education, and joblessness (Chou et al., 2017; Heller et al., 2011). Since the 1990s, research has supported the concept that the level of self-determination practiced by an individual with a disability at the end of high school has a significant impact on desired postsecondary goals (Wehmeyer, 2015). Individuals with disabilities seldom develop a functional level of self-determination without intervention (Shogren et al., 2015). Though self-determination is developmental in nature with some component elements beginning in toddlerhood, interventions and research have been focused on adolescents and adults (Cmar & Markoski, 2019). This analytical integrative review explored 41 peer-reviewed journal articles and six dissertations published between January 1, 1990, and February 28, 2023, to determine what the literature revealed about self-determination in children with disabilities. The review sought information about which self-determination component elements should be developed in children with disabilities, what types of environments and activities can provide support in the development of self-determination in children with disabilities, and if any family- or school-based programs exist for children with disabilities that effectively develop the component elements. The research questions and categories combined with the data during synthesis led to the development of seven themes: self-determination components, interventions, Individualized Education Program planning, adult perspectives, cultural and linguistical diversity, home and family, and children are not little adolescents. Findings demonstrate that additional research is needed about how to develop self-determination and its component elements in children with disabilities. Additionally, many of the interventions and programs found for children were adaptations of materials created for adolescents and adults. Developmentally appropriate interventions and programs need to be created for children with disabilities. Suggestion and implications for future research and implications for practice for families and professionals are considered.

ISBN: 9798379421076Subjects--Topical Terms:

516693
Special education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Children

An Analytical Integrative Review of the Self-Determination Construct in Children with Disabilities.
LDR:03710nmm a2200409 4500 001 2394682
005 20240429063832.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798379421076
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30420178
035 $a AAI30420178
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Griffith, Coralie A. J. $3 3764163
245 1 3 $a An Analytical Integrative Review of the Self-Determination Construct in Children with Disabilities.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 155 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Arroyo, Alan A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Regent University, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Despite changes in laws and access to education, individuals with disabilities continue to have fewer positive postsecondary outcomes than their non-disabled peers (Shogren et al., 2015). Negative secondary and postsecondary outcomes for individuals with disabilities include failure to graduate from high school, lack of postsecondary education, and joblessness (Chou et al., 2017; Heller et al., 2011). Since the 1990s, research has supported the concept that the level of self-determination practiced by an individual with a disability at the end of high school has a significant impact on desired postsecondary goals (Wehmeyer, 2015). Individuals with disabilities seldom develop a functional level of self-determination without intervention (Shogren et al., 2015). Though self-determination is developmental in nature with some component elements beginning in toddlerhood, interventions and research have been focused on adolescents and adults (Cmar & Markoski, 2019). This analytical integrative review explored 41 peer-reviewed journal articles and six dissertations published between January 1, 1990, and February 28, 2023, to determine what the literature revealed about self-determination in children with disabilities. The review sought information about which self-determination component elements should be developed in children with disabilities, what types of environments and activities can provide support in the development of self-determination in children with disabilities, and if any family- or school-based programs exist for children with disabilities that effectively develop the component elements. The research questions and categories combined with the data during synthesis led to the development of seven themes: self-determination components, interventions, Individualized Education Program planning, adult perspectives, cultural and linguistical diversity, home and family, and children are not little adolescents. Findings demonstrate that additional research is needed about how to develop self-determination and its component elements in children with disabilities. Additionally, many of the interventions and programs found for children were adaptations of materials created for adolescents and adults. Developmentally appropriate interventions and programs need to be created for children with disabilities. Suggestion and implications for future research and implications for practice for families and professionals are considered.
590 $a School code: 1058.
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 543687
653 $a Children
653 $a Disabilities
653 $a Instruction
653 $a Intervention
653 $a Self-determination
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0201
710 2 $a Regent University. $b School of Education. $3 3169899
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-10A.
790 $a 1058
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30420178