東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Nudging Policy: The Role of Knowledg...

Einfeld, Colette Esther.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Nudging Policy: The Role of Knowledge in Behavioural Insights.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Nudging Policy: The Role of Knowledge in Behavioural Insights./
作者:	Einfeld, Colette Esther.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	293 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-04B.
標題:	Bibliometrics. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29409783
ISBN:	9798352652190

Nudging Policy: The Role of Knowledge in Behavioural Insights.
Einfeld, Colette Esther.

Nudging Policy: The Role of Knowledge in Behavioural Insights. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 293 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Australian National University (Australia), 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Behavioural insights is used increasingly by governments around the world in designing public policy. It is an important addition to our knowledge about how policy works. However, little is known about policy actors' interpretation and use of different types of knowledge in the development and applications of behavioural insights. This omission matters because policy actors' privileging or excluding of different knowledges in policy making influences whose voices are heard, how problems are seen and framed, and what solutions are made possible (and preferable). Policy actors bring different forms of knowledge to policy making and, in making sense of policy problems and designing policy, shape policy processes. My research explores the question, how do policy actors interpret and use knowledge in behavioural insights? It has two lines of enquiry: which knowledges are used in behavioural insights, and do policy actors use knowledge instrumentally, politically or conceptually? I adopted an interpretive approach in my research in order to uncover the interpretations that shape policy actors' actions. The interpretations emerged from the analysis of thirty interviews with policy actors in Australia familiar with behavioural insights in their policy work.My findings demonstrate that it is important to pay attention to both what knowledge(s) are used and how they are used. I find policy actors interpret behavioural insights as an instrumental application of policy making that draws on and produces knowledge, with local knowledge struggling to fit into processes that privilege technical knowledge. Local and technical knowledges are interwoven with craft and normative knowledge as policy actors use knowledge politically to support their approach to behavioural insights, granting them resources and authority. These types of knowledge in behavioural insights influence how policy problems are interpreted, understood and addressed. My research contributes to understanding of behavioural insights as a policy approach, but also provides methodological insights into interpretive policy analysis by challenging the intentionality between interpretation and action. It contributes to the knowledge utilisation literature in describing the interdependent uses of instrumental, political and conceptual knowledge. Finally my research suggests that the uses of knowledge shape and are shaped by each other, and it is this 'system' that should be included in the study of knowledge in public policy.

ISBN: 9798352652190Subjects--Topical Terms:

842541
Bibliometrics.

Nudging Policy: The Role of Knowledge in Behavioural Insights.
LDR:03688nmm a2200385 4500 001 2394411
005 20240422070849.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798352652190
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29409783
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AustNatlU1885267288
035 $a AAI29409783
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Einfeld, Colette Esther. $3 3763885
245 1 0 $a Nudging Policy: The Role of Knowledge in Behavioural Insights.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 293 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Sullivan, Helen.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Australian National University (Australia), 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Behavioural insights is used increasingly by governments around the world in designing public policy. It is an important addition to our knowledge about how policy works. However, little is known about policy actors' interpretation and use of different types of knowledge in the development and applications of behavioural insights. This omission matters because policy actors' privileging or excluding of different knowledges in policy making influences whose voices are heard, how problems are seen and framed, and what solutions are made possible (and preferable). Policy actors bring different forms of knowledge to policy making and, in making sense of policy problems and designing policy, shape policy processes. My research explores the question, how do policy actors interpret and use knowledge in behavioural insights? It has two lines of enquiry: which knowledges are used in behavioural insights, and do policy actors use knowledge instrumentally, politically or conceptually? I adopted an interpretive approach in my research in order to uncover the interpretations that shape policy actors' actions. The interpretations emerged from the analysis of thirty interviews with policy actors in Australia familiar with behavioural insights in their policy work.My findings demonstrate that it is important to pay attention to both what knowledge(s) are used and how they are used. I find policy actors interpret behavioural insights as an instrumental application of policy making that draws on and produces knowledge, with local knowledge struggling to fit into processes that privilege technical knowledge. Local and technical knowledges are interwoven with craft and normative knowledge as policy actors use knowledge politically to support their approach to behavioural insights, granting them resources and authority. These types of knowledge in behavioural insights influence how policy problems are interpreted, understood and addressed. My research contributes to understanding of behavioural insights as a policy approach, but also provides methodological insights into interpretive policy analysis by challenging the intentionality between interpretation and action. It contributes to the knowledge utilisation literature in describing the interdependent uses of instrumental, political and conceptual knowledge. Finally my research suggests that the uses of knowledge shape and are shaped by each other, and it is this 'system' that should be included in the study of knowledge in public policy.
590 $a School code: 0433.
650 4 $a Bibliometrics. $3 842541
650 4 $a Surgery. $3 707153
650 4 $a Politics. $3 685427
650 4 $a Pandemics. $3 3464080
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Labeling. $3 3560710
650 4 $a Community. $3 531337
650 4 $a Coronaviruses. $3 894828
650 4 $a Social sciences. $3 516032
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a COVID-19. $3 3554449
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Virology. $3 642304
690 $a 0576
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0729
690 $a 0564
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0720
710 2 $a The Australian National University (Australia). $3 1952885
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-04B.
790 $a 0433
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29409783