東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Words Matter: How Institutional Disr...

Zanotto, Anton.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Words Matter: How Institutional Disruption Policies Reinforce White Power in Higher Education.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Words Matter: How Institutional Disruption Policies Reinforce White Power in Higher Education./
Author:	Zanotto, Anton.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
Description:	330 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-11A.
Subject:	Educational administration. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30310611
ISBN:	9798379584672

Words Matter: How Institutional Disruption Policies Reinforce White Power in Higher Education.
Zanotto, Anton.

Words Matter: How Institutional Disruption Policies Reinforce White Power in Higher Education. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 330 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Colorado State University, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Student conduct exists as the intersection of student development theory, legal compliance, and institutional policies. While literature in the K-12 and criminal legal system shows the way that policy has a disproportionately negative impact on Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color, there are few studies that do similar work in higher education. Furthermore, research in student conduct largely focuses on student learning and conduct administrator practices and does not consider the policies at the root of our practice. This study explores the campus discourse about disruption at eight institutions of higher education and uses a theoretical framework that uniquely considers the various nuances of this work. By centering the policies and using a critical policy discourse analysis methodology, I enter the discussion about how to create liberatory policy that subsequently supports the practice of many student conduct administrators. The subsequent model offers a set of guiding principles for liberatory policy revision and development for the future.

ISBN: 9798379584672Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122799
Educational administration.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Discourse analysis

Words Matter: How Institutional Disruption Policies Reinforce White Power in Higher Education.
LDR:02382nmm a2200421 4500 001 2392949
005 20231130111556.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798379584672
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30310611
035 $a AAI30310611
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Zanotto, Anton. $3 3762385
245 1 0 $a Words Matter: How Institutional Disruption Policies Reinforce White Power in Higher Education.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 330 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Barone, Ryan;McKelfresh, David.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Colorado State University, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Student conduct exists as the intersection of student development theory, legal compliance, and institutional policies. While literature in the K-12 and criminal legal system shows the way that policy has a disproportionately negative impact on Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color, there are few studies that do similar work in higher education. Furthermore, research in student conduct largely focuses on student learning and conduct administrator practices and does not consider the policies at the root of our practice. This study explores the campus discourse about disruption at eight institutions of higher education and uses a theoretical framework that uniquely considers the various nuances of this work. By centering the policies and using a critical policy discourse analysis methodology, I enter the discussion about how to create liberatory policy that subsequently supports the practice of many student conduct administrators. The subsequent model offers a set of guiding principles for liberatory policy revision and development for the future.
590 $a School code: 0053.
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 2122799
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Higher education administration. $3 2122863
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
653 $a Discourse analysis
653 $a Disruption
653 $a Liberatory
653 $a Institutional policies
653 $a Student conduct
653 $a Administrator practices
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0514
710 2 $a Colorado State University. $b Education (School of ). $3 1678285
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-11A.
790 $a 0053
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30310611