東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Globalization, Hierarchy, and Bureau...

Forester, Brian G.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Globalization, Hierarchy, and Bureaucracy: Exploring the Politics of Joint Military Exercises.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Globalization, Hierarchy, and Bureaucracy: Exploring the Politics of Joint Military Exercises./
作者:	Forester, Brian G.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	129 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-11A.
標題:	Military studies. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30250689
ISBN:	9798379555047

Globalization, Hierarchy, and Bureaucracy: Exploring the Politics of Joint Military Exercises.
Forester, Brian G.

Globalization, Hierarchy, and Bureaucracy: Exploring the Politics of Joint Military Exercises. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 129 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Joint military exercises (JMEs) consist of two or more militaries collaboratively training on military tasks. These activities are a common feature of modern defense relations yet under-explored in existing scholarship. Through three essays, my dissertation contributes to this gap by probing political mechanisms behind their occurrence.In the first essay, I depart from existing scholarship by shifting the analysis from major power supply to minor power demand for exercise activity. I argue minor power demand for exercises is associated with economic globalization. Increasing exposure to the global economy externalizes a state's economic security. JMEs are a cost effective and flexible pathway for minor powers to promote economic security. This pathway is especially attractive to globalized autocracies due to their inherent disadvantages in attracting outside investment and forming democratic alliance ties. Using non-major power countries between 1978 and 2016, I find that economic globalization increases the probability of participating in JMEs. I also find this relationship is amplified among autocracies.In the second essay, I shift to a network-level analysis of exercises and arms transfers. Grounded in the international hierarchy literature, I analyze how the arms and exercise networks have coevolved since the end of the Cold War. Arms and JME ties reflect a latent hierarchy that manifests in bilateral and network influences that cross networks. Using a coevolutionary network model, I confirm a reciprocal relationship between arms and exercises. My findings provide new insight into how hierarchical arms trading networks are formed and maintained. JMEs fuse arms trading networks, pointing to the latent influence available through the coordinated use of defense cooperation tools.{A0}In the third essay, I shift the level of analysis to military bureaucracies. Unresolved in existing scholarship is the extent to which military bureaucratic interests shape JME activity. Organizational theory suggests military elites prioritize bureaucratic interests in routine peacetime activity such as exercises. Using a novel sample of military officers, the original survey experiment presented in this essay shows that bureaucratic interests outweigh national interests for respondents considering a hypothetical exercise. More broadly, this study empirically demonstrates the salience of bureaucratic interests in foreign policy.

ISBN: 9798379555047Subjects--Topical Terms:

2197382
Military studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Foreign policy

Globalization, Hierarchy, and Bureaucracy: Exploring the Politics of Joint Military Exercises.
LDR:03753nmm a2200409 4500 001 2392944
005 20231130111555.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 251215s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798379555047
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30250689
035 $a AAI30250689
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Forester, Brian G. $3 3762379
245 1 0 $a Globalization, Hierarchy, and Bureaucracy: Exploring the Politics of Joint Military Exercises.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 129 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Gent, Stephen E.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Joint military exercises (JMEs) consist of two or more militaries collaboratively training on military tasks. These activities are a common feature of modern defense relations yet under-explored in existing scholarship. Through three essays, my dissertation contributes to this gap by probing political mechanisms behind their occurrence.In the first essay, I depart from existing scholarship by shifting the analysis from major power supply to minor power demand for exercise activity. I argue minor power demand for exercises is associated with economic globalization. Increasing exposure to the global economy externalizes a state's economic security. JMEs are a cost effective and flexible pathway for minor powers to promote economic security. This pathway is especially attractive to globalized autocracies due to their inherent disadvantages in attracting outside investment and forming democratic alliance ties. Using non-major power countries between 1978 and 2016, I find that economic globalization increases the probability of participating in JMEs. I also find this relationship is amplified among autocracies.In the second essay, I shift to a network-level analysis of exercises and arms transfers. Grounded in the international hierarchy literature, I analyze how the arms and exercise networks have coevolved since the end of the Cold War. Arms and JME ties reflect a latent hierarchy that manifests in bilateral and network influences that cross networks. Using a coevolutionary network model, I confirm a reciprocal relationship between arms and exercises. My findings provide new insight into how hierarchical arms trading networks are formed and maintained. JMEs fuse arms trading networks, pointing to the latent influence available through the coordinated use of defense cooperation tools.{A0}In the third essay, I shift the level of analysis to military bureaucracies. Unresolved in existing scholarship is the extent to which military bureaucratic interests shape JME activity. Organizational theory suggests military elites prioritize bureaucratic interests in routine peacetime activity such as exercises. Using a novel sample of military officers, the original survey experiment presented in this essay shows that bureaucratic interests outweigh national interests for respondents considering a hypothetical exercise. More broadly, this study empirically demonstrates the salience of bureaucratic interests in foreign policy.
590 $a School code: 0153.
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
650 4 $a Military history. $3 552332
653 $a Foreign policy
653 $a Military training
653 $a Security cooperation
653 $a Economic globalization
653 $a Military bureaucracies
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0750
690 $a 0635
690 $a 0722
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $b Political Science. $3 1064900
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-11A.
790 $a 0153
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30250689