東華大學圖書館 |

Fluctuating Cohesion: A Grounded Theory Study of Nursing Students Engaged in a Hybrid Debriefing Format /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Fluctuating Cohesion: A Grounded Theory Study of Nursing Students Engaged in a Hybrid Debriefing Format // Carol Lynn Senette.
作者:	Senette, Carol Lynn,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (208 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-12B.
標題:	Nursing. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28261222
ISBN:	9798738630255

Fluctuating Cohesion: A Grounded Theory Study of Nursing Students Engaged in a Hybrid Debriefing Format /
Senette, Carol Lynn,

Fluctuating Cohesion: A Grounded Theory Study of Nursing Students Engaged in a Hybrid Debriefing Format /Carol Lynn Senette. - 1 electronic resource (208 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: B.

Debriefing is a key component of simulation that promotes development of students' reflective processes. Instructor-led debriefing (ILD) is considered the gold standard; however, research conducted over the past decade demonstrates the negative effects of anxiety on student reflection during ILD. Nursing students' experiences with ILDs have been substantially investigated; yet scant research explores students' perceptions and experiences of more learner-centered debriefing formats that deemphasize the instructor role.The purpose of this grounded theory study was to explore undergraduate nursing students' perceptions and experiences of a hybrid debriefing format consisting of peer-led debriefing followed immediately by ILD. Specifically, I aimed to inductively develop a theory grounded in the student experience to provide understanding of the actions and social processes that occurred as students engaged in the combined debriefing format. I also sought to better understand how associated social processes affect reflection during debriefing.Straussian grounded theory informed all aspects of the study's research plan, sampling techniques, and data collection and analysis. I conducted the study at a public university in Anchorage, Alaska. I used purposive sampling to identify an initial cohort of senior-level nursing students enrolled in specific associate or bachelor's degree nursing courses who possessed first-hand experience with the hybrid format. Thirty-four nursing students participated in the study. Data were collected over 6 months during semistructured focus group interviews (2−6 participants per group) conducted separately by program. Focus group interviews were recorded and transcribed. A demographic survey, completed by the participants, described the sample. Field notes, observational notes, and memos provided supplemental secondary data.The core category that explicated the pervasive, fundamental patterned processes that emerged from the data analysis was fluctuating cohesion. Fluctuating cohesion involved students' predominant sense of experiencing multiple transitions between states of collective unity ("we-ness") and individual separatism ("me-ness") as they progressed through the two-part debriefing format. The dichotomy between the informal collaborative environment of peer-led debriefing and the instructor-driven nature of ILD resulted in fluctuations in group cohesion.The multifaceted process of fluctuating cohesion was comprised of five related categories: discovering the process, normalizing experiences, developing mutuality, dynamic balancing, and engaging informal social connections. Discovering the process involved the individual and collective actions of students upon encountering a debriefing format that challenged the existing paradigm. Normalizing experiences encompassed students' actions aimed at simultaneously diffusing emotions and seeking validation and empathy. Through the process of developing mutuality, students' evolving sense of interdependence fostered a sense of empowerment and collective unity. The process of dynamic balancing involved students responding to the demands and incongruencies experienced upon encountering the shift from a self-directed to an instructor-directed debriefing agenda. Lastly, by engaging informal social connections, students turned to trusted relationships to retain a sense of togetherness, to continue emotional processing, and to extend reflection in self-selected, nonthreatening settings.The study findings indicated that augmenting ILD with peer-led debriefing promoted psychological safety, facilitated the development of team behaviors, and enhanced reflective thinking after simulation. The study findings provided a theory-based foundation for future research and practice, including instrument development and educational strategies to optimize debriefing effectiveness.

English

ISBN: 9798738630255Subjects--Topical Terms:

528444
Nursing.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Alternative and combined debriefing format

Fluctuating Cohesion: A Grounded Theory Study of Nursing Students Engaged in a Hybrid Debriefing Format /
LDR:05616nmm a22005173i 4500 001 2391306
005 20250923061200.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 251029s2020 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798738630255
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI28261222
035 $a AAI28261222
035 $a 2391306
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Senette, Carol Lynn, $e author. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-6380-7237 $3 3759056
245 1 0 $a Fluctuating Cohesion: A Grounded Theory Study of Nursing Students Engaged in a Hybrid Debriefing Format / $c Carol Lynn Senette.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 1 electronic resource (208 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: Dingley, Catherine Committee members: Doolen, Jessica; Reyes, Andrew; Gordon, Howard.
502 $b Ph.D. $c University of Nevada, Las Vegas $d 2020.
520 $a Debriefing is a key component of simulation that promotes development of students' reflective processes. Instructor-led debriefing (ILD) is considered the gold standard; however, research conducted over the past decade demonstrates the negative effects of anxiety on student reflection during ILD. Nursing students' experiences with ILDs have been substantially investigated; yet scant research explores students' perceptions and experiences of more learner-centered debriefing formats that deemphasize the instructor role.The purpose of this grounded theory study was to explore undergraduate nursing students' perceptions and experiences of a hybrid debriefing format consisting of peer-led debriefing followed immediately by ILD. Specifically, I aimed to inductively develop a theory grounded in the student experience to provide understanding of the actions and social processes that occurred as students engaged in the combined debriefing format. I also sought to better understand how associated social processes affect reflection during debriefing.Straussian grounded theory informed all aspects of the study's research plan, sampling techniques, and data collection and analysis. I conducted the study at a public university in Anchorage, Alaska. I used purposive sampling to identify an initial cohort of senior-level nursing students enrolled in specific associate or bachelor's degree nursing courses who possessed first-hand experience with the hybrid format. Thirty-four nursing students participated in the study. Data were collected over 6 months during semistructured focus group interviews (2−6 participants per group) conducted separately by program. Focus group interviews were recorded and transcribed. A demographic survey, completed by the participants, described the sample. Field notes, observational notes, and memos provided supplemental secondary data.The core category that explicated the pervasive, fundamental patterned processes that emerged from the data analysis was fluctuating cohesion. Fluctuating cohesion involved students' predominant sense of experiencing multiple transitions between states of collective unity ("we-ness") and individual separatism ("me-ness") as they progressed through the two-part debriefing format. The dichotomy between the informal collaborative environment of peer-led debriefing and the instructor-driven nature of ILD resulted in fluctuations in group cohesion.The multifaceted process of fluctuating cohesion was comprised of five related categories: discovering the process, normalizing experiences, developing mutuality, dynamic balancing, and engaging informal social connections. Discovering the process involved the individual and collective actions of students upon encountering a debriefing format that challenged the existing paradigm. Normalizing experiences encompassed students' actions aimed at simultaneously diffusing emotions and seeking validation and empathy. Through the process of developing mutuality, students' evolving sense of interdependence fostered a sense of empowerment and collective unity. The process of dynamic balancing involved students responding to the demands and incongruencies experienced upon encountering the shift from a self-directed to an instructor-directed debriefing agenda. Lastly, by engaging informal social connections, students turned to trusted relationships to retain a sense of togetherness, to continue emotional processing, and to extend reflection in self-selected, nonthreatening settings.The study findings indicated that augmenting ILD with peer-led debriefing promoted psychological safety, facilitated the development of team behaviors, and enhanced reflective thinking after simulation. The study findings provided a theory-based foundation for future research and practice, including instrument development and educational strategies to optimize debriefing effectiveness.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0506
650 4 $a Nursing. $3 528444
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
653 $a Alternative and combined debriefing format
653 $a Learner-centered
653 $a Peers
653 $a Psychological safety
653 $a Team mentality
653 $a Reflection
653 $a Metacognitive training
653 $a Collaboration
653 $a Instructor-led debriefing
690 $a 0569
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a University of Nevada, Las Vegas. $b Nursing. $e degree granting institution. $3 3759057
720 1 $a Dingley, Catherine $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-12B.
790 $a 0506
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28261222