東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The principle as ground, non-contradiction and Aristotle

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The principle as ground, non-contradiction and Aristotle/ by Aldo Stella, Giancarlo Ianulardo.
作者:	Stella, Aldo.
其他作者:	Ianulardo, Giancarlo.
出版者:	Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland : : 2024.,
面頁冊數:	vi, 95 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	1 Introduction -- 2 The formal elenchos appearing in the Principle of Non-Contradiction -- 3 The proof of the Protrepticus as an overcoming of formal elenchus -- 4 Some theoretical implications of the argument -- 5 Conclusion.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Logic. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74414-3
ISBN:	9783031744143

The principle as ground, non-contradiction and Aristotle
Stella, Aldo.

The principle as ground, non-contradiction and Aristotle[electronic resource] /by Aldo Stella, Giancarlo Ianulardo. - Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2024. - vi, 95 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1 Introduction -- 2 The formal elenchos appearing in the Principle of Non-Contradiction -- 3 The proof of the Protrepticus as an overcoming of formal elenchus -- 4 Some theoretical implications of the argument -- 5 Conclusion.

"We have the thesis, as radical as it is suggestive, of a syntactic-formal reduction of the principle of non-contradiction (Metaphysics IV), which must transcend itself into the principle of demonstration (Protrepticus) Read through the Aristotelian texts, the irreducibility of the principle of intelligibility to its determination will question and challenge both the theoretician and the historian of philosophy." -Carlo Scilironi, Professor of Theoretical Philosophy, University of Padua, Italy. "The work shows that the authentic principle-ground can neither be determined nor obtained as the result of a proof, not even of the elenchus type, as in Aristotle's Metaphysics, but is that by virtue of which any proof is possible, as in Aristotle's Protrepticus, where it is shown that the necessity of philosophising is the ground even of its attempted negation. It will prove an essential reading for specialists in metaphysics." -Ricardo Crespo, Professor of Philosophy of Economics, Austral University, Argentina. Numerous thinkers have considered the Principle of Non-Contradiction, but none has clearly identified its inherent limitation: that it is itself only a formal principle. This book shows that negation plays a fundamental role both in the constitution of the principle and in the affirmation of its value, which consists in its undeniability. Since it is a formal negation, it is extrinsic to the negated in such a way that it is configured as a negation only insofar as it is applied to something. On the basis of this analysis, it is shown that it is possible to reverse the usual philosophical perspective: it makes no sense to speak of proof of the principle, but only of proof by virtue of the principle. This book is essential reading for all scholars and researchers of theoretical philosophy and Aristotle. Aldo Stella, former Professor of Philosophy at the University of Urbino, is Professor of Psychology at the University of Perugia, Italy. Giancarlo Ianulardo is Senior Lecturer in Economics at the University of Exeter, UK.

ISBN: 9783031744143

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-74414-3doiSubjects--Personal Names:

528226
Aristotle.
Subjects--Topical Terms:

529544
Logic.

LC Class. No.: BC108

Dewey Class. No.: 160

The principle as ground, non-contradiction and Aristotle
LDR:03262nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 2380579
003 DE-He213
005 20241025125723.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 250418s2024 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031744143 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031744136 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-74414-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-74414-3
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BC108
072 7 $a HPCA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI002000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDHA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 160 $2 23
090 $a BC108 $b .S824 2024
100 1 $a Stella, Aldo. $3 3734095
245 1 4 $a The principle as ground, non-contradiction and Aristotle $h [electronic resource] / $c by Aldo Stella, Giancarlo Ianulardo.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer Nature Switzerland : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2024.
300 $a vi, 95 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1 Introduction -- 2 The formal elenchos appearing in the Principle of Non-Contradiction -- 3 The proof of the Protrepticus as an overcoming of formal elenchus -- 4 Some theoretical implications of the argument -- 5 Conclusion.
520 $a "We have the thesis, as radical as it is suggestive, of a syntactic-formal reduction of the principle of non-contradiction (Metaphysics IV), which must transcend itself into the principle of demonstration (Protrepticus) Read through the Aristotelian texts, the irreducibility of the principle of intelligibility to its determination will question and challenge both the theoretician and the historian of philosophy." -Carlo Scilironi, Professor of Theoretical Philosophy, University of Padua, Italy. "The work shows that the authentic principle-ground can neither be determined nor obtained as the result of a proof, not even of the elenchus type, as in Aristotle's Metaphysics, but is that by virtue of which any proof is possible, as in Aristotle's Protrepticus, where it is shown that the necessity of philosophising is the ground even of its attempted negation. It will prove an essential reading for specialists in metaphysics." -Ricardo Crespo, Professor of Philosophy of Economics, Austral University, Argentina. Numerous thinkers have considered the Principle of Non-Contradiction, but none has clearly identified its inherent limitation: that it is itself only a formal principle. This book shows that negation plays a fundamental role both in the constitution of the principle and in the affirmation of its value, which consists in its undeniability. Since it is a formal negation, it is extrinsic to the negated in such a way that it is configured as a negation only insofar as it is applied to something. On the basis of this analysis, it is shown that it is possible to reverse the usual philosophical perspective: it makes no sense to speak of proof of the principle, but only of proof by virtue of the principle. This book is essential reading for all scholars and researchers of theoretical philosophy and Aristotle. Aldo Stella, former Professor of Philosophy at the University of Urbino, is Professor of Psychology at the University of Perugia, Italy. Giancarlo Ianulardo is Senior Lecturer in Economics at the University of Exeter, UK.
600 0 0 $a Aristotle. $3 528226
650 0 $a Logic. $3 529544
650 0 $a Negation (Logic) $3 763145
650 1 4 $a Ancient Philosophy / Classical Philosophy. $3 3597175
650 2 4 $a Metaphysics. $3 517082
700 1 $a Ianulardo, Giancarlo. $3 3734096
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74414-3
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)