東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Politics? What Politics? Digital Fandom and Sociopolitical Belief.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Politics? What Politics? Digital Fandom and Sociopolitical Belief./
作者:	Ford, Sarah Ellen.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2023,
面頁冊數:	213 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-11A.
標題:	American studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30540696
ISBN:	9798379532680

Politics? What Politics? Digital Fandom and Sociopolitical Belief.
Ford, Sarah Ellen.

Politics? What Politics? Digital Fandom and Sociopolitical Belief. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 213 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Bowling Green State University, 2023.

In 2020, people across the world began to live nearly all their lives online thanks to the global COVID-19 pandemic. Social media allowed people in quarantine and isolation to safely interact no matter where in the world they were. For some, however, this way of online existence had been happening for years. Fans of all sorts of media texts and media objects had flocked to digital realms for years as a way of finding others who felt the same way they did. Some fans choose to use their social media platform of choice to put forward a digital fan identity that fore fronted their role as a fan rather than any aspect of their offline identity. This work looks at the ways that specific social media platforms can impact the ways that fan communities form and how these communities can have impact on the sociopolitical views that users are exposed to. Using the sociopolitical touchstone of the Black Lives Matter movement in May and June 2020, this project utilizes a mixed-methods analysis of digital conversations across Twitter, TikTok,and Instagram. In comparing the three platforms it becomes clear that the unique affordances of each platform combine with unique dynamics of each fan group to privilege the voices and beliefs of socially acceptable fans. It also becomes clear that the distinctive affordances of each platform have the ability to shape offline interactions and sociopolitical ideals in different ways. We can see here just a glimpse into how the online can shape the offline in ways that have growing implications for our understanding of the social and political world.

ISBN: 9798379532680Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122720
American studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

New media

Politics? What Politics? Digital Fandom and Sociopolitical Belief.
LDR:02846nmm a2200421 4500 001 2365934
005 20240918072808.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 241017s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798379532680
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30540696
035 $a AAI30540696
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ford, Sarah Ellen. $3 3707212
245 1 0 $a Politics? What Politics? Digital Fandom and Sociopolitical Belief.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 213 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.
500 $a Includes supplementary digital materials.
500 $a Advisor: Gajjala, Radhika.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Bowling Green State University, 2023.
520 $a In 2020, people across the world began to live nearly all their lives online thanks to the global COVID-19 pandemic. Social media allowed people in quarantine and isolation to safely interact no matter where in the world they were. For some, however, this way of online existence had been happening for years. Fans of all sorts of media texts and media objects had flocked to digital realms for years as a way of finding others who felt the same way they did. Some fans choose to use their social media platform of choice to put forward a digital fan identity that fore fronted their role as a fan rather than any aspect of their offline identity. This work looks at the ways that specific social media platforms can impact the ways that fan communities form and how these communities can have impact on the sociopolitical views that users are exposed to. Using the sociopolitical touchstone of the Black Lives Matter movement in May and June 2020, this project utilizes a mixed-methods analysis of digital conversations across Twitter, TikTok,and Instagram. In comparing the three platforms it becomes clear that the unique affordances of each platform combine with unique dynamics of each fan group to privilege the voices and beliefs of socially acceptable fans. It also becomes clear that the distinctive affordances of each platform have the ability to shape offline interactions and sociopolitical ideals in different ways. We can see here just a glimpse into how the online can shape the offline in ways that have growing implications for our understanding of the social and political world.
590 $a School code: 0018.
650 4 $a American studies. $3 2122720
650 4 $a Black studies. $3 2122689
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
653 $a New media
653 $a Social media
653 $a Fan studies
653 $a Digital community
653 $a Digital identity
653 $a Black lives matter
690 $a 0323
690 $a 0325
690 $a 0646
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a Bowling Green State University. $b American Culture Studies. $3 3187153
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-11A.
790 $a 0018
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30540696