東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Legal Trends Involving Discipline of Students with Disabilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and the Virginia Special Education Regulations : = Analysis of Virginia Hearing Officer Decisions from 2009 through 2015.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Legal Trends Involving Discipline of Students with Disabilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and the Virginia Special Education Regulations :/
其他題名:	Analysis of Virginia Hearing Officer Decisions from 2009 through 2015.
作者:	Alhambra, Amir.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (336 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-10, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-10A.
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29066849click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798426806702

Legal Trends Involving Discipline of Students with Disabilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and the Virginia Special Education Regulations : = Analysis of Virginia Hearing Officer Decisions from 2009 through 2015.
Alhambra, Amir.

Legal Trends Involving Discipline of Students with Disabilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and the Virginia Special Education Regulations :Analysis of Virginia Hearing Officer Decisions from 2009 through 2015. - 1 online resource (336 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-10, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--The George Washington University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Researchers have noted disparities in the discipline of students with disabilities (Miller & Meyers, 2015; Losen, et al., 2015; Achilles, McLaughlin, & Croninger, 2007; Krezmien, Leone, & Achilles, 2006; Zhang, Katsiyannis, & Herbst, 2004; Fasko, Grubb, & Osborne, 1997). This study reviewed 22 Virginia Special Education Hearing Officer(HO) decisions, issued from 2009 through 2015, to better understand the types of legal issues related to discipline of students with disabilities. Further, the study investigated the factual nuances and trends within the selected hearing officer decisions related to the school district as the prevailing party and the parent as the prevailing party. The author found that the school district typically prevailed at due process on issues involving discipline of students with disabilities, with the Virginia HOs holding that the district complied with the procedure mandates of IDEA. From both the decisions where school districts prevailed as well as the decisions where it did not, the data from the study showed trends that yielded training and practice opportunities for educators and administrators to conduct appropriate and timely FBAs and develop appropriate BIPs and IEP goals aimed to prevent misconduct. Further, it allowed the author to make suggestions for pre-service licensure programs to both learn and practice the procedural and substantive mechanisms set out in IDEA for preventing discipline of students with disability in tandem with Greene's Collaborative and Proactive Solutions (CPS) model (Greene, 1999; 2016).

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798426806702Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.
Subjects--Index Terms:

DisciplineIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Legal Trends Involving Discipline of Students with Disabilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and the Virginia Special Education Regulations : = Analysis of Virginia Hearing Officer Decisions from 2009 through 2015.
LDR:03043nmm a2200373K 4500 001 2365675
005 20231218204634.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798426806702
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29066849
035 $a AAI29066849
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Alhambra, Amir. $3 3706538
245 1 0 $a Legal Trends Involving Discipline of Students with Disabilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and the Virginia Special Education Regulations : $b Analysis of Virginia Hearing Officer Decisions from 2009 through 2015.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (336 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-10, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Sherrill Linkous, Kelly.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--The George Washington University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Researchers have noted disparities in the discipline of students with disabilities (Miller & Meyers, 2015; Losen, et al., 2015; Achilles, McLaughlin, & Croninger, 2007; Krezmien, Leone, & Achilles, 2006; Zhang, Katsiyannis, & Herbst, 2004; Fasko, Grubb, & Osborne, 1997). This study reviewed 22 Virginia Special Education Hearing Officer(HO) decisions, issued from 2009 through 2015, to better understand the types of legal issues related to discipline of students with disabilities. Further, the study investigated the factual nuances and trends within the selected hearing officer decisions related to the school district as the prevailing party and the parent as the prevailing party. The author found that the school district typically prevailed at due process on issues involving discipline of students with disabilities, with the Virginia HOs holding that the district complied with the procedure mandates of IDEA. From both the decisions where school districts prevailed as well as the decisions where it did not, the data from the study showed trends that yielded training and practice opportunities for educators and administrators to conduct appropriate and timely FBAs and develop appropriate BIPs and IEP goals aimed to prevent misconduct. Further, it allowed the author to make suggestions for pre-service licensure programs to both learn and practice the procedural and substantive mechanisms set out in IDEA for preventing discipline of students with disability in tandem with Greene's Collaborative and Proactive Solutions (CPS) model (Greene, 1999; 2016).
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 543687
653 $a Discipline
653 $a Students
653 $a Disabilities
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0201
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Educational Administration & Policy Studies. $3 3279659
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-10A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29066849 $z click for full text (PQDT)