東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Jesus or John : = Using discourse boundaries, prominence, and cohesion to identify the speaker in John 3:16-21.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Jesus or John :/
Reminder of title:	Using discourse boundaries, prominence, and cohesion to identify the speaker in John 3:16-21.
Author:	Rigsby, Dustin M.
Description:	1 online resource (103 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International78-11.
Subject:	Linguistics. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10587300click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369677744

Jesus or John : = Using discourse boundaries, prominence, and cohesion to identify the speaker in John 3:16-21.
Rigsby, Dustin M.

Jesus or John :Using discourse boundaries, prominence, and cohesion to identify the speaker in John 3:16-21. - 1 online resource (103 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11.

Thesis (M.A.)--New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, 2016.

Includes bibliographical references

The purpose of this thesis is to determine the presence of speaker shifts in John 3:16-21 with the use of discourse analysis as discussed by Stanley Porter in his intermediate grammar, Idioms of the Greek New Testament . The prominent question to be answered involves whether or not John offered his own exposition in 3:16-21, or if these verses are a continuing representation of Jesus' dialogue with Nicodemus. Three methods of discourse analysis are used successively in order to reach the stated goal. The first method utilizes discourse boundary features to set the parameters of the units within 3:1- 21. These boundaries will contribute an outline for the remainder of the study. The second method constitutes an analysis of prominent features within each section in order to evaluate the speaker(s) emphases. Finally, an examination of the various cohesive ties within the pericope helps to show how each unit works in tandem with the other units to communicate a coherent message. By analyzing each of these factors, this study identifies those shifts that most indicate a possible change in speaker.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369677744Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Discourse AnalysisIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Jesus or John : = Using discourse boundaries, prominence, and cohesion to identify the speaker in John 3:16-21.
LDR:02477nmm a2200373K 4500 001 2365525
005 20231212104140.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369677744
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10587300
035 $a AAI10587300
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Rigsby, Dustin M. $3 3706382
245 1 0 $a Jesus or John : $b Using discourse boundaries, prominence, and cohesion to identify the speaker in John 3:16-21.
264 0 $c 2016
300 $a 1 online resource (103 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Ray, Charles.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, 2016.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The purpose of this thesis is to determine the presence of speaker shifts in John 3:16-21 with the use of discourse analysis as discussed by Stanley Porter in his intermediate grammar, Idioms of the Greek New Testament . The prominent question to be answered involves whether or not John offered his own exposition in 3:16-21, or if these verses are a continuing representation of Jesus' dialogue with Nicodemus. Three methods of discourse analysis are used successively in order to reach the stated goal. The first method utilizes discourse boundary features to set the parameters of the units within 3:1- 21. These boundaries will contribute an outline for the remainder of the study. The second method constitutes an analysis of prominent features within each section in order to evaluate the speaker(s) emphases. Finally, an examination of the various cohesive ties within the pericope helps to show how each unit works in tandem with the other units to communicate a coherent message. By analyzing each of these factors, this study identifies those shifts that most indicate a possible change in speaker.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Biblical studies. $3 2122820
653 $a Discourse Analysis
653 $a Jesus and Nicodemus
653 $a Stanley Porter
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0321
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary. $3 1043536
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 78-11.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10587300 $z click for full text (PQDT)