東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Is Monogamy the Only Way? A Study on Attachment Styles and Relationship Satisfaction among Gay and Bisexual Men Who Participate in Non-monogamous Relationships.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Is Monogamy the Only Way? A Study on Attachment Styles and Relationship Satisfaction among Gay and Bisexual Men Who Participate in Non-monogamous Relationships./
作者:	Aprill, Eric Theophil.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (120 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-04B.
標題:	Clinical psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28720516click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798460455331

Is Monogamy the Only Way? A Study on Attachment Styles and Relationship Satisfaction among Gay and Bisexual Men Who Participate in Non-monogamous Relationships.
Aprill, Eric Theophil.

Is Monogamy the Only Way? A Study on Attachment Styles and Relationship Satisfaction among Gay and Bisexual Men Who Participate in Non-monogamous Relationships. - 1 online resource (120 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--Adler University, 2021.

Includes bibliographical references

This study aimed to expand upon previous research by focusing on the attachment styles of gay and bisexual males in consensual non-monogamous relationships (CNMs) with one of the four attachment styles. The research questions of this study focused on the relationships between attachment style and CNM relationship styles, relationship satisfaction and CNM relationship styles, and attachment style and relationship satisfaction. The only hypothesis for this study was that there would be a relationship between attachment style and relationship satisfaction among gay and bisexual men who participate in CNM relationships in that htose with secure attachment styles would report higher levels of relationship satisfaction than those with anxious, avoidant, or fearful attachment styles, with no difference in relationship satisfaction between CNM relationship styles. Participants were located through social media and dating applications. Each participant completed a demographic survey, the Experiences in Close Relationship-Revised Scale (ECR-R), and the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) to assess their attachment style and relationship satisfaction. Most of the participants identified as gay men with advanced degrees participating in open relationships. So many similar participants make it difficult to generalize the results to the broad gay and bisexual population in the United States. The results showed that those with secure attachment styles reported experiencing average to above-average relationship satisfaction regardless of their CNM relationship style. Individuals with anxious attachment styles experienced significantly lower levels of relationship satisfaction, irrespective of their CNM relationship style. These results suggest that it is not the CNM relationship style that significantly impacts relationship satisfaction; it is an individual's attachment style that affects relationship satisfaction. Implications of these results for theory, research, and practice are discussed.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798460455331Subjects--Topical Terms:

524863
Clinical psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

MonogamyIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Is Monogamy the Only Way? A Study on Attachment Styles and Relationship Satisfaction among Gay and Bisexual Men Who Participate in Non-monogamous Relationships.
LDR:03476nmm a2200397K 4500 001 2365166
005 20231213130602.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2021 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798460455331
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28720516
035 $a AAI28720516
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Aprill, Eric Theophil. $3 3705993
245 1 0 $a Is Monogamy the Only Way? A Study on Attachment Styles and Relationship Satisfaction among Gay and Bisexual Men Who Participate in Non-monogamous Relationships.
264 0 $c 2021
300 $a 1 online resource (120 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Pytluk, Scott.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--Adler University, 2021.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This study aimed to expand upon previous research by focusing on the attachment styles of gay and bisexual males in consensual non-monogamous relationships (CNMs) with one of the four attachment styles. The research questions of this study focused on the relationships between attachment style and CNM relationship styles, relationship satisfaction and CNM relationship styles, and attachment style and relationship satisfaction. The only hypothesis for this study was that there would be a relationship between attachment style and relationship satisfaction among gay and bisexual men who participate in CNM relationships in that htose with secure attachment styles would report higher levels of relationship satisfaction than those with anxious, avoidant, or fearful attachment styles, with no difference in relationship satisfaction between CNM relationship styles. Participants were located through social media and dating applications. Each participant completed a demographic survey, the Experiences in Close Relationship-Revised Scale (ECR-R), and the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) to assess their attachment style and relationship satisfaction. Most of the participants identified as gay men with advanced degrees participating in open relationships. So many similar participants make it difficult to generalize the results to the broad gay and bisexual population in the United States. The results showed that those with secure attachment styles reported experiencing average to above-average relationship satisfaction regardless of their CNM relationship style. Individuals with anxious attachment styles experienced significantly lower levels of relationship satisfaction, irrespective of their CNM relationship style. These results suggest that it is not the CNM relationship style that significantly impacts relationship satisfaction; it is an individual's attachment style that affects relationship satisfaction. Implications of these results for theory, research, and practice are discussed.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a LGBTQ studies. $3 2122706
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
653 $a Monogamy
653 $a Attachment styles
653 $a Relationship satisfaction
653 $a Gay and bisexual men
653 $a Non-monogamous relationships
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0492
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Adler University. $b Clinical Psychology - Chicago. $3 3541762
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-04B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28720516 $z click for full text (PQDT)