東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Politicians or Parties? Assessing the Effects of Intraparty Conflict in the United States.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Politicians or Parties? Assessing the Effects of Intraparty Conflict in the United States./
Author:	McClellan, Oliver Ahlstrom.
Description:	1 online resource (253 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-02A.
Subject:	Political science. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28644719click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798534664669

Politicians or Parties? Assessing the Effects of Intraparty Conflict in the United States.
McClellan, Oliver Ahlstrom.

Politicians or Parties? Assessing the Effects of Intraparty Conflict in the United States. - 1 online resource (253 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2021.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation presents the results of a series of large-N, demographically representative survey experiments conducted at different stages of the 2020 presidential election cycle, designed to test the effects of highlighting intraparty policy conflict on subjects' political beliefs. I find politicians of both major political parties are able to persuade followers to take on counter-party policy positions with limited electoral risk, and that these persuasive effects are enduring, still detectable nine months after treatment. While subjects updated their own policy positions in response to treatment, they did not update the policy positions they prefer when selecting among hypothetical candidates, in contrast to issue voting theorists predictions. While politicians appear to be far more effective opinion leaders than parties, therefore, their persuasive abilities may not significantly alter the shape of the partisan electorate as faced by other candidates. These findings refine our scholarly understanding of individual politicians as opinion leaders in the contemporary United States, and demonstrates the challenges political parties face in checking their popular politicians.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798534664669Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

American politicsIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Politicians or Parties? Assessing the Effects of Intraparty Conflict in the United States.
LDR:02679nmm a2200433K 4500 001 2363568
005 20231127093546.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2021 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798534664669
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28644719
035 $a AAI28644719
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a McClellan, Oliver Ahlstrom. $3 3704337
245 1 0 $a Politicians or Parties? Assessing the Effects of Intraparty Conflict in the United States.
264 0 $c 2021
300 $a 1 online resource (253 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Green, Donald P.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2021.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation presents the results of a series of large-N, demographically representative survey experiments conducted at different stages of the 2020 presidential election cycle, designed to test the effects of highlighting intraparty policy conflict on subjects' political beliefs. I find politicians of both major political parties are able to persuade followers to take on counter-party policy positions with limited electoral risk, and that these persuasive effects are enduring, still detectable nine months after treatment. While subjects updated their own policy positions in response to treatment, they did not update the policy positions they prefer when selecting among hypothetical candidates, in contrast to issue voting theorists predictions. While politicians appear to be far more effective opinion leaders than parties, therefore, their persuasive abilities may not significantly alter the shape of the partisan electorate as faced by other candidates. These findings refine our scholarly understanding of individual politicians as opinion leaders in the contemporary United States, and demonstrates the challenges political parties face in checking their popular politicians.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Public opinion. $3 531264
650 4 $a Ideology. $3 521772
650 4 $a Hypotheses. $3 3560118
650 4 $a Power. $3 518736
650 4 $a Experiments. $3 525909
650 4 $a Political leadership. $3 619337
650 4 $a Political parties. $3 516328
650 4 $a Dissertations & theses. $3 3560115
650 4 $a Fines & penalties. $3 3560680
650 4 $a Political campaigns. $3 590744
650 4 $a Election results. $3 3556048
650 4 $a Presidential elections. $3 3560858
650 4 $a Candidates. $3 3560859
650 4 $a Partisanship. $3 3562071
650 4 $a Firearms. $2 fast $3 3509397
650 4 $a Accountability. $3 3435301
653 $a American politics
653 $a Experiments
653 $a Persuasion
653 $a Political communication
653 $a Political parties
653 $a Public opinion
653 $a Public discourse
653 $a Political beliefs
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0681
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Political Science. $3 1677427
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28644719 $z click for full text (PQDT)