東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Ideological Framing : = Key to Overcoming Motivated Reasoning on Climate Change.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Ideological Framing :/
其他題名:	Key to Overcoming Motivated Reasoning on Climate Change.
作者:	Larson, Kyra.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (53 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-02.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29169376click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798837551345

Ideological Framing : = Key to Overcoming Motivated Reasoning on Climate Change.
Larson, Kyra.

Ideological Framing :Key to Overcoming Motivated Reasoning on Climate Change. - 1 online resource (53 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Kansas, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Research has demonstrated that the presentation of scientific information about climate change strengthens Democrats' belief in the scientific consensus on this issue and increases their support for mitigation policy solutions. By contrast, this same information fails to increase support from Republicans and, sometimes, results in a backfire effect, where Republicans reject the scientific consensus and disapprove of these mitigation policies to a greater extent than if not exposed to this information. I argue that Republicans are motivated to reject this scientific information about climate change because the policy solutions are typically communicated in a manner inconsistent with their ideological values. I theorize that framing policy solutions using arguments that invoke conservative values will result in policy support from Republicans. I test this hypothesis and related expectations using a survey experiment in which respondents are randomly assigned to one of three strategically crafted messages that do and do not invoke conservative economic values. In doing so, I directly assess the distinct effects of economic information and environmental protection information on support for climate mitigation policy. The importance of these findings for public opinion, political communication, and the adoption of climate change policy solutions is discussed.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798837551345Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Climate mitigation policyIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Ideological Framing : = Key to Overcoming Motivated Reasoning on Climate Change.
LDR:02707nmm a2200385K 4500 001 2362540
005 20231102121820.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798837551345
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29169376
035 $a AAI29169376
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Larson, Kyra. $3 3703280
245 1 0 $a Ideological Framing : $b Key to Overcoming Motivated Reasoning on Climate Change.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (53 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02.
500 $a Advisor: Mullinix, Kevin.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Kansas, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Research has demonstrated that the presentation of scientific information about climate change strengthens Democrats' belief in the scientific consensus on this issue and increases their support for mitigation policy solutions. By contrast, this same information fails to increase support from Republicans and, sometimes, results in a backfire effect, where Republicans reject the scientific consensus and disapprove of these mitigation policies to a greater extent than if not exposed to this information. I argue that Republicans are motivated to reject this scientific information about climate change because the policy solutions are typically communicated in a manner inconsistent with their ideological values. I theorize that framing policy solutions using arguments that invoke conservative values will result in policy support from Republicans. I test this hypothesis and related expectations using a survey experiment in which respondents are randomly assigned to one of three strategically crafted messages that do and do not invoke conservative economic values. In doing so, I directly assess the distinct effects of economic information and environmental protection information on support for climate mitigation policy. The importance of these findings for public opinion, political communication, and the adoption of climate change policy solutions is discussed.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
653 $a Climate mitigation policy
653 $a Political psychology
653 $a Solution aversion model
653 $a Republicans
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0404
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of Kansas. $b Political Science. $3 1279768
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-02.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29169376 $z click for full text (PQDT)