東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Who Said What to Whom? : = Contextual Memory Processes in Bilinguals.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Who Said What to Whom? :/
其他題名:	Contextual Memory Processes in Bilinguals.
作者:	Tsuboi, Naoko.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (100 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-07B.
標題:	Psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29999552click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798368457123

Who Said What to Whom? : = Contextual Memory Processes in Bilinguals.
Tsuboi, Naoko.

Who Said What to Whom? :Contextual Memory Processes in Bilinguals. - 1 online resource (100 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at El Paso, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Source memory is memory for sources of information (who gave the information), whereas destination memory is memory for destinations of information (to whom the information was given). Prior literature found that source memory exceeded destination memory, and destination memory was impaired remarkably under high cognitive demand tasks. These findings supported the attention hypothesis, the idea that greater attentional resource availability leads to better source and destination memory. The current study extended prior source and destination research to bilingualism because bilinguals are thought to have a greater attention control ability than monolinguals. In the only published study to compare bilingual and monolingual source memory, bilinguals outperformed monolinguals, and there were no language proficiency effects within bilinguals. The current study examined for the first time whether the same pattern would be observed in destination memory and also investigated the allocation of attentional resources under different encoding situations.In Experiment 1, bilingual and monolingual participants were asked to have conversations with a randomly assigned confederate on the computer screen (a direct-interaction setting). In Experiment 2, bilingual and monolingual participants were asked to observe conversations of two randomly assigned confederates (an observational setting) so that no self-generation processing was involved. Source and destination memory did not vary as a function of language proficiency, providing evidence that contextual information is associated with item information at a conceptual level. Bilinguals outperformed monolinguals in source and destination memory when no self-generation was involved, suggesting that bilinguals form content-context associations more efficiently. Source memory was more accurate than destination memory in both experiments, indicating that people allocate less attention to destinations than to sources, whether self-generation is required or not. Source and destination accuracy were negatively associated, suggesting that allocating more attention to one takes attention away from the other.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798368457123Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Attentional resourcesIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Who Said What to Whom? : = Contextual Memory Processes in Bilinguals.
LDR:03518nmm a2200385K 4500 001 2362193
005 20231027103333.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798368457123
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29999552
035 $a AAI29999552
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Tsuboi, Naoko. $3 3702911
245 1 0 $a Who Said What to Whom? : $b Contextual Memory Processes in Bilinguals.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (100 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-07, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Francis, Wendy S.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at El Paso, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Source memory is memory for sources of information (who gave the information), whereas destination memory is memory for destinations of information (to whom the information was given). Prior literature found that source memory exceeded destination memory, and destination memory was impaired remarkably under high cognitive demand tasks. These findings supported the attention hypothesis, the idea that greater attentional resource availability leads to better source and destination memory. The current study extended prior source and destination research to bilingualism because bilinguals are thought to have a greater attention control ability than monolinguals. In the only published study to compare bilingual and monolingual source memory, bilinguals outperformed monolinguals, and there were no language proficiency effects within bilinguals. The current study examined for the first time whether the same pattern would be observed in destination memory and also investigated the allocation of attentional resources under different encoding situations.In Experiment 1, bilingual and monolingual participants were asked to have conversations with a randomly assigned confederate on the computer screen (a direct-interaction setting). In Experiment 2, bilingual and monolingual participants were asked to observe conversations of two randomly assigned confederates (an observational setting) so that no self-generation processing was involved. Source and destination memory did not vary as a function of language proficiency, providing evidence that contextual information is associated with item information at a conceptual level. Bilinguals outperformed monolinguals in source and destination memory when no self-generation was involved, suggesting that bilinguals form content-context associations more efficiently. Source memory was more accurate than destination memory in both experiments, indicating that people allocate less attention to destinations than to sources, whether self-generation is required or not. Source and destination accuracy were negatively associated, suggesting that allocating more attention to one takes attention away from the other.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
653 $a Attentional resources
653 $a Bilingualism
653 $a Destination memory
653 $a Source memory
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The University of Texas at El Paso. $b Psychology. $3 1680299
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-07B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29999552 $z click for full text (PQDT)