東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Working Memory Performance : = Is Subjective Measurement a Better Predictor Than Cognitive Load?

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Working Memory Performance :/
Reminder of title:	Is Subjective Measurement a Better Predictor Than Cognitive Load?
Author:	McCray, Megan M.
Description:	1 online resource (54 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-11.
Subject:	Psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30521997click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379583521

Working Memory Performance : = Is Subjective Measurement a Better Predictor Than Cognitive Load?
McCray, Megan M.

Working Memory Performance :Is Subjective Measurement a Better Predictor Than Cognitive Load? - 1 online resource (54 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of South Dakota, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

We rely on our capacity for rapid attention switching to conduct multiple tasks simultaneously. Leading working memory models assume that memory maintenance and attention-demanding secondary task processing cannot coincide. Any reduction in memory maintenance activities occurring due to secondary task processing leads to impaired recall. This temporal relationship is typically characterized through the proportion of time spent attending to the concurrent processing task, also called cognitive load. Although the primary determinant of forgetting in leading models, recent findings show limitations to cognitive load effects in multitasking. We investigated whether the effects of cognitive load are a byproduct of subjective task difficulty assessments by participants during a visuospatial working-memory dual-task by asking participants to complete subjective workload measurement (NASA-TLX). Results were compared to objective cognitive load to determine which measurement is a better model for predicting multitasking effects. The present findings inform our understanding of human working memory capabilities and the role of both subjective workload and objective cognitive load in driving memory performance during multitasking.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379583521Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Visual working memoryIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Working Memory Performance : = Is Subjective Measurement a Better Predictor Than Cognitive Load?
LDR:02610nmm a2200397K 4500 001 2362097
005 20231027103233.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379583521
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30521997
035 $a AAI30521997
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a McCray, Megan M. $3 3702800
245 1 0 $a Working Memory Performance : $b Is Subjective Measurement a Better Predictor Than Cognitive Load?
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (54 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11.
500 $a Advisor: Ricker, Timothy.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of South Dakota, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a We rely on our capacity for rapid attention switching to conduct multiple tasks simultaneously. Leading working memory models assume that memory maintenance and attention-demanding secondary task processing cannot coincide. Any reduction in memory maintenance activities occurring due to secondary task processing leads to impaired recall. This temporal relationship is typically characterized through the proportion of time spent attending to the concurrent processing task, also called cognitive load. Although the primary determinant of forgetting in leading models, recent findings show limitations to cognitive load effects in multitasking. We investigated whether the effects of cognitive load are a byproduct of subjective task difficulty assessments by participants during a visuospatial working-memory dual-task by asking participants to complete subjective workload measurement (NASA-TLX). Results were compared to objective cognitive load to determine which measurement is a better model for predicting multitasking effects. The present findings inform our understanding of human working memory capabilities and the role of both subjective workload and objective cognitive load in driving memory performance during multitasking.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
653 $a Visual working memory
653 $a Working memory
653 $a Cognitive load
653 $a Multitasking
653 $a Subjective workload
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a University of South Dakota. $b Psychology (Human Factors). $3 3352629
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-11.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30521997 $z click for full text (PQDT)