東華大學圖書館 |

Limiting Freedom of Expression in Digital Platforms : = Between State Obligations and Intermediary Moderation in a Multicultural Context = Limiter la Liberte D'expression sur les Plateformes Digitales : Entre Obligations de L'etat et Moderation par des Intermediaires dans un Contexte Multiculturel.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Limiting Freedom of Expression in Digital Platforms :/
Reminder of title:	Between State Obligations and Intermediary Moderation in a Multicultural Context = Limiter la Liberte D'expression sur les Plateformes Digitales : Entre Obligations de L'etat et Moderation par des Intermediaires dans un Contexte Multiculturel.
remainder title:	Limiter la Liberte D'expression sur les Plateformes Digitales :
Author:	Ashik, S. M.Morsalin Hider.
Description:	1 online resource (85 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-10.
Subject:	Hate speech. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30347141click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798377677185

Limiting Freedom of Expression in Digital Platforms : = Between State Obligations and Intermediary Moderation in a Multicultural Context = Limiter la Liberte D'expression sur les Plateformes Digitales : Entre Obligations de L'etat et Moderation par des Intermediaires dans un Contexte Multiculturel.
Ashik, S. M.Morsalin Hider.

Limiting Freedom of Expression in Digital Platforms :Between State Obligations and Intermediary Moderation in a Multicultural Context = Limiter la Liberte D'expression sur les Plateformes Digitales : Entre Obligations de L'etat et Moderation par des Intermediaires dans un Contexte Multiculturel.Limiter la Liberte D'expression sur les Plateformes Digitales :Entre Obligations de L'etat et Moderation par des Intermediaires dans un Contexte Multiculturel. - 1 online resource (85 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10.

Thesis (LL.M.)--McGill University (Canada), 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Digital platforms have reshaped our understanding of public communication. Anyone with smart gadgets with an internet connection can publish their opinion outside of our traditional understanding of media without any cost. These digital platforms provide opportunities to engage in public debate, no matter where anyone is. While promoting free expression worldwide, they apply their enforcement mechanism to make the internet safe for their users. Their enforcement mechanisms mostly remain publicly inaccessible, and at the same time, they are under tremendous pressure from governments to remove certain illegal and sometimes harmful content from their platforms. While doing so, their policies often resulted in the suppression of free expression around the globe. The transnational or rather global nature of digital platforms is creating challenges to determine what law is to be followed. Additionally, in the absence of any guiding principles in international human rights law for this 'special' type of media platform, it is also difficult to protect freedom of expression and other associated rights. This study examines the challenges of human rights-based content moderation by digital platforms aka intermediaries, focusing on the cultural diversity in the global platform. This study argues that existing international human rights laws' mechanisms in their present form are not adequate to address the complex legal challenges of digital platforms. I conclude by suggesting a need to have a universally accepted guiding principle where the limit of self-governance by intermediaries and platform governance by states will be balanced.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798377677185Subjects--Topical Terms:

737070
Hate speech.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Limiting Freedom of Expression in Digital Platforms : = Between State Obligations and Intermediary Moderation in a Multicultural Context = Limiter la Liberte D'expression sur les Plateformes Digitales : Entre Obligations de L'etat et Moderation par des Intermediaires dans un Contexte Multiculturel.
LDR:05221nmm a2200397K 4500 001 2362048
005 20231027103220.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798377677185
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30347141
035 $a (MiAaPQ)McGill_2z10ww73g
035 $a AAI30347141
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Ashik, S. M.Morsalin Hider. $3 3702748
245 1 0 $a Limiting Freedom of Expression in Digital Platforms : $b Between State Obligations and Intermediary Moderation in a Multicultural Context = Limiter la Liberte D'expression sur les Plateformes Digitales : Entre Obligations de L'etat et Moderation par des Intermediaires dans un Contexte Multiculturel.
246 3 1 $a Limiter la Liberte D'expression sur les Plateformes Digitales : $b Entre Obligations de L'etat et Moderation par des Intermediaires dans un Contexte Multiculturel.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (85 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-10.
500 $a Advisor: Megret, Frederic Jean.
502 $a Thesis (LL.M.)--McGill University (Canada), 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Digital platforms have reshaped our understanding of public communication. Anyone with smart gadgets with an internet connection can publish their opinion outside of our traditional understanding of media without any cost. These digital platforms provide opportunities to engage in public debate, no matter where anyone is. While promoting free expression worldwide, they apply their enforcement mechanism to make the internet safe for their users. Their enforcement mechanisms mostly remain publicly inaccessible, and at the same time, they are under tremendous pressure from governments to remove certain illegal and sometimes harmful content from their platforms. While doing so, their policies often resulted in the suppression of free expression around the globe. The transnational or rather global nature of digital platforms is creating challenges to determine what law is to be followed. Additionally, in the absence of any guiding principles in international human rights law for this 'special' type of media platform, it is also difficult to protect freedom of expression and other associated rights. This study examines the challenges of human rights-based content moderation by digital platforms aka intermediaries, focusing on the cultural diversity in the global platform. This study argues that existing international human rights laws' mechanisms in their present form are not adequate to address the complex legal challenges of digital platforms. I conclude by suggesting a need to have a universally accepted guiding principle where the limit of self-governance by intermediaries and platform governance by states will be balanced.
520 $a Les plateformes digitales contribuent a faconner notre comprehension de la communication publique. N'importe quelle personne avec un acces a des gadgets intelligents et une connexion internet peut desormais publier son opinion en dehors de tout media traditionnel et sans cout. Ces plateformes digitales fournissent des occasions pour le debat public, ou que se trouvent les intervenants. Tout en tentant de promouvoir la liberte d'expression globalement, les plateformes digitales mettent en oeuvre des mecanismes afin de rendre l'internet securitaire pour ses utilisateurs. Cependant, ces mecanismes de mise en oeuvre demeurent largement inaccessibles au public, tout en subissant des pressions considerables de la part des gouvernements pour retirer certains contenus illegaux ou meme simplement nocifs de leurs plateformes. Il en decoule souvent une suppression effective de la liberte d'expression globalement. La nature transnationale ou meme universelle des plateformes digitales cree des defis pour identifier le droit applicable. En outre, en l'absence de principes directeurs en matiere de droit international des droits humains adaptes a ces types particuliers de plateforme mediatique, il est egalement difficile de proteger la liberte d'expression et les droits qui s'y rattachent. La presente these envisage les defis d'une moderation par les plateformes digitales entendues comme intermediaires en se concentrant sur la question de la diversite culturelle sur les plateformes globales. Elle soutient que les mecanismes existants de droit international de droits humains ne sont pas adequats pour repondre aux defis juridiques complexes que rencontrent ces plateformes. Je conclue en suggerant le besoin d'avoir un principe universellement accepte qui limite l'auto-gouvernance des intermediaires et la reconcilie avec la gouvernance des plateformes par les Etats.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Hate speech. $3 737070
650 4 $a Riots. $3 1972755
650 4 $a Racial discrimination. $3 3682108
650 4 $a Censorship. $3 572838
650 4 $a Criminal law. $3 562467
650 4 $a Criminology. $3 533274
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Multicultural education. $3 526718
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0627
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0455
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a McGill University (Canada). $3 1018122
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-10.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30347141 $z click for full text (PQDT)