東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Psychological Distances and Sunk Cost Fallacy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Psychological Distances and Sunk Cost Fallacy./
作者:	Jiang, Huangqi.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (94 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-09, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-09A.
標題:	Cognitive psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30359675click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798371901132

Psychological Distances and Sunk Cost Fallacy.
Jiang, Huangqi.

Psychological Distances and Sunk Cost Fallacy. - 1 online resource (94 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-09, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Case Western Reserve University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

In what circumstances will we fall prey to the sunk cost fallacy? Based on construal level theory, the present research investigated psychological distances (proximal vs. distal) as moderators that influence people's decision making with sunk costs. I ran a series of studies to test the effects of different types of psychological distances (spatial, temporal, social, and hypothetical) on sunk cost fallacy using scenario-based questions. I found significant but weak evidence that psychological distance may impact decision-making processes when sunk cost is involved. However, participants' construal level was not measurably altered by psychological distance condition. Despite the weak behavioral evidence, I followed up on these studies to test whether psychological distances altered implicit decision-making processes. In this follow-up study, I manipulated sunk costs and spatial psychological distance. I then applied participants? reaction times and decisions to a Diffusion Decision Model (DDM). In this model, I decomposed the underlying processes of decision making with sunk cost by comparing proximal and distal psychological distance conditions. Though the behavioral results did not show explicit differences in sunk cost fallacy between these two conditions, participants tended to respond faster in distal conditions. Further, the DDM suggested that the narrow threshold for evidence accumulation can be predicted by the differences between proximal and distal conditions. This work advances our understanding of psychological distances and decision making with sunk cost.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798371901132Subjects--Topical Terms:

523881
Cognitive psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Psychological distancesIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Psychological Distances and Sunk Cost Fallacy.
LDR:02886nmm a2200373K 4500 001 2361582
005 20231019095702.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798371901132
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30359675
035 $a AAI30359675
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Jiang, Huangqi. $3 3702260
245 1 0 $a Psychological Distances and Sunk Cost Fallacy.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (94 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-09, Section: A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Case Western Reserve University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a In what circumstances will we fall prey to the sunk cost fallacy? Based on construal level theory, the present research investigated psychological distances (proximal vs. distal) as moderators that influence people's decision making with sunk costs. I ran a series of studies to test the effects of different types of psychological distances (spatial, temporal, social, and hypothetical) on sunk cost fallacy using scenario-based questions. I found significant but weak evidence that psychological distance may impact decision-making processes when sunk cost is involved. However, participants' construal level was not measurably altered by psychological distance condition. Despite the weak behavioral evidence, I followed up on these studies to test whether psychological distances altered implicit decision-making processes. In this follow-up study, I manipulated sunk costs and spatial psychological distance. I then applied participants? reaction times and decisions to a Diffusion Decision Model (DDM). In this model, I decomposed the underlying processes of decision making with sunk cost by comparing proximal and distal psychological distance conditions. Though the behavioral results did not show explicit differences in sunk cost fallacy between these two conditions, participants tended to respond faster in distal conditions. Further, the DDM suggested that the narrow threshold for evidence accumulation can be predicted by the differences between proximal and distal conditions. This work advances our understanding of psychological distances and decision making with sunk cost.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
653 $a Psychological distances
653 $a Sunk cost fallacy
653 $a Construal level
653 $a Diffusion decision model
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0623
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Case Western Reserve University. $b Psychology. $3 3168717
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-09A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30359675 $z click for full text (PQDT)