東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Predictive Model for Electrical Assembly Manufacturing Defect Dispositions.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Predictive Model for Electrical Assembly Manufacturing Defect Dispositions./
作者:	Rodriguez, Linda M.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (110 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-06, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-06B.
標題:	Engineering. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30000017click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798358486065

Predictive Model for Electrical Assembly Manufacturing Defect Dispositions.
Rodriguez, Linda M.

Predictive Model for Electrical Assembly Manufacturing Defect Dispositions. - 1 online resource (110 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-06, Section: B.

Thesis (D.Engr.)--The George Washington University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Defects produced during the manufacturing of electrical assemblies require time and resources to evaluate and determine next steps. After the identification of a defect, an engineer performs a review. Using their expertise and judgement, they decide if the assembly will be reworked, removed and replaced, retested, scrapped or determined to not be a defect.In the Defense Industry, there is a strong emphasis on continuous improvement to remain competitive. Industry 4.0 has increased the amount of manufacturing and quality data available for analysis and provides new opportunities to apply machine learning. This research is a practical application of machine learning methodologies to predict defect dispositions for a manufacturing center that produces electrical assemblies in the Defense Industry.The original data set included two sources from a quality database with 22,508 instances from January 2019 through June 2022. This data set was unbalanced with significantly more minor rework classifications than any other type. The imbalance was addressed through ensuring the test data set had the same proportion of classifications, choosing models that typically perform well with that condition, cross-validating the models, and measuring balanced accuracy in addition to overall accuracy.The four models trained, validated, and tested included: a simple baseline that chooses the majority class, Decision Tree, Random Forest, and AdaBoost. The baseline had an overall accuracy of 68% and a balanced accuracy of 17%. Decision Tree had an overall accuracy of 84% and a balanced accuracy of 61%. Random Forest had an overall accuracy of 89% and a balanced accuracy of 72%. AdaBoost had an overall accuracy of 80% and a balanced accuracy of 70%. Random Forest performed best in overall accuracy, balanced accuracy, precision, recall, and F-1 score.Recommendations for future research include collecting additional data to expand the data set, especially in the less common classes to improve class accuracies and balanced accuracy. Researchers may wish to focus on test failures and predicting which components will need to be reworked using the quality data from this research in combination with test data. Additionally, other features such as cost of assembly and yield could be explored to further improve accuracy performance.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798358486065Subjects--Topical Terms:

586835
Engineering.
Subjects--Index Terms:

DefectIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Predictive Model for Electrical Assembly Manufacturing Defect Dispositions.
LDR:03628nmm a2200361K 4500 001 2361021
005 20231024102909.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798358486065
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30000017
035 $a AAI30000017
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Rodriguez, Linda M. $3 1026375
245 1 0 $a Predictive Model for Electrical Assembly Manufacturing Defect Dispositions.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (110 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-06, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Jones, Michael C.
502 $a Thesis (D.Engr.)--The George Washington University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Defects produced during the manufacturing of electrical assemblies require time and resources to evaluate and determine next steps. After the identification of a defect, an engineer performs a review. Using their expertise and judgement, they decide if the assembly will be reworked, removed and replaced, retested, scrapped or determined to not be a defect.In the Defense Industry, there is a strong emphasis on continuous improvement to remain competitive. Industry 4.0 has increased the amount of manufacturing and quality data available for analysis and provides new opportunities to apply machine learning. This research is a practical application of machine learning methodologies to predict defect dispositions for a manufacturing center that produces electrical assemblies in the Defense Industry.The original data set included two sources from a quality database with 22,508 instances from January 2019 through June 2022. This data set was unbalanced with significantly more minor rework classifications than any other type. The imbalance was addressed through ensuring the test data set had the same proportion of classifications, choosing models that typically perform well with that condition, cross-validating the models, and measuring balanced accuracy in addition to overall accuracy.The four models trained, validated, and tested included: a simple baseline that chooses the majority class, Decision Tree, Random Forest, and AdaBoost. The baseline had an overall accuracy of 68% and a balanced accuracy of 17%. Decision Tree had an overall accuracy of 84% and a balanced accuracy of 61%. Random Forest had an overall accuracy of 89% and a balanced accuracy of 72%. AdaBoost had an overall accuracy of 80% and a balanced accuracy of 70%. Random Forest performed best in overall accuracy, balanced accuracy, precision, recall, and F-1 score.Recommendations for future research include collecting additional data to expand the data set, especially in the less common classes to improve class accuracies and balanced accuracy. Researchers may wish to focus on test failures and predicting which components will need to be reworked using the quality data from this research in combination with test data. Additionally, other features such as cost of assembly and yield could be explored to further improve accuracy performance.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Engineering. $3 586835
653 $a Defect
653 $a Machine learning
653 $a Manufacturing
653 $a Quality
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0537
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Engineering Management. $3 1262973
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-06B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30000017 $z click for full text (PQDT)