東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Universal Design for Learning and Students with Intellectual Disabilities : = A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Universal Design for Learning and Students with Intellectual Disabilities :/
Reminder of title:	A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
Author:	Flis, Clement R., Jr.
Description:	1 online resource (231 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-05A.
Subject:	Educational administration. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28152954click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798684695452

Universal Design for Learning and Students with Intellectual Disabilities : = A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
Flis, Clement R., Jr.

Universal Design for Learning and Students with Intellectual Disabilities :A Qualitative Descriptive Study. - 1 online resource (231 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Grand Canyon University, 2020.

Includes bibliographical references

The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore how educators describe implementation of specific components of universal design for learning for students with intellectual disabilities in inclusive classrooms in the Southwestern United States. This study was guided by Constructive Alignment Theory that is devising teaching and learning activities and assessments that directly address the proposed learning results. The questions this study addressed were: How do educators describe the process of implementing universal design for learning? How do educators describe the successes and challenges of implementing universal design for learning in inclusive classroom settings for students with intellectual disabilities? This study used a sample of 90 participants from six different high schools. From that target of 25 participants, 10 participated in a focus group and 15 participated in individual semi-structured interviews. The remaining 65 participants served as a reserve for cases of attrition. Thematic analysis provided relevant patterns and themes from the data collected during the focus group and interviews. The results of the data analysis revealed that the two most important themes were intentional planning for student variability and flexible methods and materials. The themes described by the participants were differentiated lesson plans, use of student multiple intelligences, strengths and weaknesses of students with intellectual disabilities, use of manipulatives, and lesson modifications. In conclusion, this study indicated how general and special educators were able to implement components of UDL framework in inclusive classroom settings for students of intellectual disabilities.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798684695452Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122799
Educational administration.
Subjects--Index Terms:

DifferentiateIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Universal Design for Learning and Students with Intellectual Disabilities : = A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
LDR:03321nmm a2200445K 4500 001 2360818
005 20231015185425.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2020 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798684695452
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28152954
035 $a AAI28152954
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Flis, Clement R., Jr. $3 3701452
245 1 0 $a Universal Design for Learning and Students with Intellectual Disabilities : $b A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
264 0 $c 2020
300 $a 1 online resource (231 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Krasch, Delilah; Burner, Kerry.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Grand Canyon University, 2020.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore how educators describe implementation of specific components of universal design for learning for students with intellectual disabilities in inclusive classrooms in the Southwestern United States. This study was guided by Constructive Alignment Theory that is devising teaching and learning activities and assessments that directly address the proposed learning results. The questions this study addressed were: How do educators describe the process of implementing universal design for learning? How do educators describe the successes and challenges of implementing universal design for learning in inclusive classroom settings for students with intellectual disabilities? This study used a sample of 90 participants from six different high schools. From that target of 25 participants, 10 participated in a focus group and 15 participated in individual semi-structured interviews. The remaining 65 participants served as a reserve for cases of attrition. Thematic analysis provided relevant patterns and themes from the data collected during the focus group and interviews. The results of the data analysis revealed that the two most important themes were intentional planning for student variability and flexible methods and materials. The themes described by the participants were differentiated lesson plans, use of student multiple intelligences, strengths and weaknesses of students with intellectual disabilities, use of manipulatives, and lesson modifications. In conclusion, this study indicated how general and special educators were able to implement components of UDL framework in inclusive classroom settings for students of intellectual disabilities.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 2122799
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 543687
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
653 $a Differentiate
653 $a Inclusive classrooms
653 $a Intellectual disabilities
653 $a Multiple intelligences
653 $a Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
653 $a Southwestern United States
653 $a Constructive Alignment Theory
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0201
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0727
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Grand Canyon University. $b College of Doctoral Studies. $3 2097618
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-05A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28152954 $z click for full text (PQDT)