東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Pay for performance in dentistry : = Is it worth it?

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Pay for performance in dentistry :/
其他題名:	Is it worth it?
作者:	Voinea-Griffin, Andreea Emilia.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (212 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International78-03B.
標題:	Finance. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10149565click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369046656

Pay for performance in dentistry : = Is it worth it?
Voinea-Griffin, Andreea Emilia.

Pay for performance in dentistry :Is it worth it? - 1 online resource (212 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2016.

Includes bibliographical references

Introduction: The variability of dental care and the slow implementation of evidence-based dentistry point to the need for change. Pay for performance (P4P) programs may foster quality improvement if appropriately designed. This work demonstrates the use of modeling and simulation to evaluate such programs prior to deployment. An example is provided in the form of a P4P program for the treatment of occlusal early caries (EC) in permanent teeth. Research Design: The proposed P4P program evaluation consists of two steps. First step is to determine the optimal treatment. In this example, three non-invasive treatments (NTs), watchful-waiting (WW), sealants, and fluoride treatments were compared based on their cost-effectiveness (CE). The CE analysis used a Markov model, Monte Carlo simulations; it run over a 10-year timeframe for two different scenarios (amalgam and composite restorations). Simulations were conducted for several NT strategies: status quo, 30% or 75% increase from baseline in each NT, 100% of each NT, and 100% restoration treatment. The impact of periodontal disease, plan member disenrollment and death were accounted for. Second, the financial feasibility of the P4P was evaluated through a breakeven analysis. Results: This analysis showed that all NTs are more CE than the status quo or a 100% restoration strategy. Fluoride treatments seem to be more cost-effective than WW and sealants, although this difference is most likely not statistically significant. The relationship between strategies was dose-dependent, with 100% NT more CE than the strategies with 75% and 30% increases from the baseline. The restorative material used later in the caries treatment seem to have a larger impact on CE than NT, with amalgam more CE than composites. A P4P program aimed at increasing NT is financially feasible, although the small size of the available incentives at or below the breakeven point raises serious doubts about their ability to impact change. This example demonstrates that such a methodology can be used to evaluate P4P in dentistry. Conclusions: The proposed methodology is useful not only in evaluating the financial feasibility but also in guiding the selection of target performance areas when P4P programs are developed. Keywords: Pay for performance, quality improvement in dentistry, early caries, non-invasive caries treatment, cost-effectiveness analysis, modeling and simulation.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369046656Subjects--Topical Terms:

542899
Finance.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Cost-effectiveness analysisIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Pay for performance in dentistry : = Is it worth it?
LDR:03978nmm a2200445K 4500 001 2360191
005 20230926101804.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369046656
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10149565
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uab:11924
035 $a AAI10149565
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Voinea-Griffin, Andreea Emilia. $3 3700805
245 1 0 $a Pay for performance in dentistry : $b Is it worth it?
264 0 $c 2016
300 $a 1 online resource (212 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Kilgore, Meredith.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2016.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Introduction: The variability of dental care and the slow implementation of evidence-based dentistry point to the need for change. Pay for performance (P4P) programs may foster quality improvement if appropriately designed. This work demonstrates the use of modeling and simulation to evaluate such programs prior to deployment. An example is provided in the form of a P4P program for the treatment of occlusal early caries (EC) in permanent teeth. Research Design: The proposed P4P program evaluation consists of two steps. First step is to determine the optimal treatment. In this example, three non-invasive treatments (NTs), watchful-waiting (WW), sealants, and fluoride treatments were compared based on their cost-effectiveness (CE). The CE analysis used a Markov model, Monte Carlo simulations; it run over a 10-year timeframe for two different scenarios (amalgam and composite restorations). Simulations were conducted for several NT strategies: status quo, 30% or 75% increase from baseline in each NT, 100% of each NT, and 100% restoration treatment. The impact of periodontal disease, plan member disenrollment and death were accounted for. Second, the financial feasibility of the P4P was evaluated through a breakeven analysis. Results: This analysis showed that all NTs are more CE than the status quo or a 100% restoration strategy. Fluoride treatments seem to be more cost-effective than WW and sealants, although this difference is most likely not statistically significant. The relationship between strategies was dose-dependent, with 100% NT more CE than the strategies with 75% and 30% increases from the baseline. The restorative material used later in the caries treatment seem to have a larger impact on CE than NT, with amalgam more CE than composites. A P4P program aimed at increasing NT is financially feasible, although the small size of the available incentives at or below the breakeven point raises serious doubts about their ability to impact change. This example demonstrates that such a methodology can be used to evaluate P4P in dentistry. Conclusions: The proposed methodology is useful not only in evaluating the financial feasibility but also in guiding the selection of target performance areas when P4P programs are developed. Keywords: Pay for performance, quality improvement in dentistry, early caries, non-invasive caries treatment, cost-effectiveness analysis, modeling and simulation.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Finance. $3 542899
650 4 $a Dentistry. $3 828971
650 4 $a Health care management. $3 2122906
653 $a Cost-effectiveness analysis
653 $a Dentistry
653 $a Early caries
653 $a Modeling and simulation
653 $a Noninvasive caries treatment
653 $a Pay for performance
653 $a Quality improvement
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0567
690 $a 0769
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The University of Alabama at Birmingham. $b Administration/Health Services. $3 3557041
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 78-03B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10149565 $z click for full text (PQDT)