東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Regional Variation in Gravel-Based Lithic Economies : = Archaeological Investigations at Stark Farm (22OK778) and Grand Village (22AD501).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Regional Variation in Gravel-Based Lithic Economies :/
其他題名:	Archaeological Investigations at Stark Farm (22OK778) and Grand Village (22AD501).
作者:	Perry, Matthew.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (102 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International84-04.
標題:	Archaeology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29260711click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798352696606

Regional Variation in Gravel-Based Lithic Economies : = Archaeological Investigations at Stark Farm (22OK778) and Grand Village (22AD501).
Perry, Matthew.

Regional Variation in Gravel-Based Lithic Economies :Archaeological Investigations at Stark Farm (22OK778) and Grand Village (22AD501). - 1 online resource (102 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04.

Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Mississippi, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

The lithic economies of the Late Mississippian and Early Contact periods have in the past been characterized as simple and lacking complexities, however this is a flawed assumption (Binford 1980:10). This thesis aims to highlight the variations and complexities that existed in gravel-based lithic economies exploring how these variations present themselves in the archaeological record. These variations will be examined through several quantitative methods including mass, cortex, flake and biface analysis. I will also use historical accounts and archaeological reports to place these assemblages in the Late Mississippian and Early Contact periods. This research compares the gravel-based lithic assemblages from two sites, the Grand Village of the Natchez (22AD501) in Natchez, Mississippi and Stark Farm (22OK778) in Starkville, Mississippi. These two sites were selected because they have many commonalities. The assemblages analyzed from each site are roughly contemporaneous and both make excellent use of gravel resources for the production of stone tools. However, their lithic economies differ greatly in both how resources were gathered and how those resources were prepared prior to tool production. Primarily, this research examines how gravel resources are gathered, how source area distances affect resource preparation, and how indigenous communities negotiate their geographic and geological surroundings to maintain lithic economies. The conclusion of the study is that the variations we observe in the archaeological record are outcomes of indigenous decision-making. These decisions range from what tools to produce, where to source materials, and whether or not to engage in resource maximization strategies such as thermal alteration, repeated core usage and bifacial tool production. All of these decisions are affected by two basic factors, resource acquisition strategies and context. Resource acquisition strategies are driven by the distance to resources and the time it takes to both gather and process them. This process informs how indigenous manufacturers made decisions based on the choices available to them through their geographic and geological surroundings. Meanwhile, the contexts in which lithic tool are found molds what tools are likely utilized in that space. Together, these two factors highlight how indigenous communities negotiated and manipulated their lithic economies to benefit their communities.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798352696606Subjects--Topical Terms:

558412
Archaeology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

ArchaeologyIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Regional Variation in Gravel-Based Lithic Economies : = Archaeological Investigations at Stark Farm (22OK778) and Grand Village (22AD501).
LDR:03857nmm a2200385K 4500 001 2358260
005 20230731101817.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798352696606
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29260711
035 $a AAI29260711
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Perry, Matthew. $3 3698799
245 1 0 $a Regional Variation in Gravel-Based Lithic Economies : $b Archaeological Investigations at Stark Farm (22OK778) and Grand Village (22AD501).
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (102 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 84-04.
500 $a Advisor: Boudreaux, Tony.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Mississippi, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The lithic economies of the Late Mississippian and Early Contact periods have in the past been characterized as simple and lacking complexities, however this is a flawed assumption (Binford 1980:10). This thesis aims to highlight the variations and complexities that existed in gravel-based lithic economies exploring how these variations present themselves in the archaeological record. These variations will be examined through several quantitative methods including mass, cortex, flake and biface analysis. I will also use historical accounts and archaeological reports to place these assemblages in the Late Mississippian and Early Contact periods. This research compares the gravel-based lithic assemblages from two sites, the Grand Village of the Natchez (22AD501) in Natchez, Mississippi and Stark Farm (22OK778) in Starkville, Mississippi. These two sites were selected because they have many commonalities. The assemblages analyzed from each site are roughly contemporaneous and both make excellent use of gravel resources for the production of stone tools. However, their lithic economies differ greatly in both how resources were gathered and how those resources were prepared prior to tool production. Primarily, this research examines how gravel resources are gathered, how source area distances affect resource preparation, and how indigenous communities negotiate their geographic and geological surroundings to maintain lithic economies. The conclusion of the study is that the variations we observe in the archaeological record are outcomes of indigenous decision-making. These decisions range from what tools to produce, where to source materials, and whether or not to engage in resource maximization strategies such as thermal alteration, repeated core usage and bifacial tool production. All of these decisions are affected by two basic factors, resource acquisition strategies and context. Resource acquisition strategies are driven by the distance to resources and the time it takes to both gather and process them. This process informs how indigenous manufacturers made decisions based on the choices available to them through their geographic and geological surroundings. Meanwhile, the contexts in which lithic tool are found molds what tools are likely utilized in that space. Together, these two factors highlight how indigenous communities negotiated and manipulated their lithic economies to benefit their communities.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Archaeology. $3 558412
653 $a Archaeology
653 $a Grand village
653 $a Lithic economies
653 $a Mississippi archaeology
653 $a Southeastern Archaeology
653 $a Stark farm
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0324
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The University of Mississippi. $b Anthropology. $3 3349713
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 84-04.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29260711 $z click for full text (PQDT)