東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Seismic Design According to Eurocode 8 and AZDTN 2.3-1 Code : = Case Study of Multistorey Building in Baku.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Seismic Design According to Eurocode 8 and AZDTN 2.3-1 Code :/
Reminder of title:	Case Study of Multistorey Building in Baku.
Author:	Alasgarov, Amir Elxan Oglu.
Description:	1 online resource (133 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-09B.
Subject:	Load. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28992391click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798209811251

Seismic Design According to Eurocode 8 and AZDTN 2.3-1 Code : = Case Study of Multistorey Building in Baku.
Alasgarov, Amir Elxan Oglu.

Seismic Design According to Eurocode 8 and AZDTN 2.3-1 Code :Case Study of Multistorey Building in Baku. - 1 online resource (133 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: B.

Thesis (Master's)--Instituto Politecnico de Leiria (Portugal), 2020.

Includes bibliographical references

Detailed and entire research in the comparison of seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures under European seismic code and Azerbaijan seismic code are not yet provided. However, there are big interests from the Azerbaijan Republic to involve European codes as state construction norms in Azerbaijan. Because of this, comparison has been made to help Azerbaijan move to European Standards.The following aspects were taken into account in order to make a comparison of seismic codes: design states, structural types, ground conditions, important classes, seismic zones, horizontal elastic response spectrum, base shear force and distribution of the horizontal seismic forces. Chapter 4 compares results of the case study in Chapter 3. To make a seismic analysis, the existing constructed structure was taken into account to apply seismic codes of Europe and Azerbaijan. The Robot Structural Analysis software was used for modelling structure and analysing it behaviour and results.The several aspects of both seismic codes are quite similar, such as design limit states, seismic zones, but the most similar aspect observed in the research is that of the characteristics of ground types. The almost 80% of difference in base shear force is observed for studied building. Also, studies show that Azerbaijan code is much more conservative in terms of shape of elastic response spectrum in poor soil conditions than European seismic code.Basically, overall results of research show that Azerbaijan Construction Norms, in terms of seismic design, are much more conservative in all aspects comparing with European codes. The main reason for this is the high seismicity of number of regions of Azerbaijan. Also, to consider is the cost of construction materials in Azerbaijan is way less that the cost in Europe.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798209811251Subjects--Topical Terms:

3562902
Load.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Seismic Design According to Eurocode 8 and AZDTN 2.3-1 Code : = Case Study of Multistorey Building in Baku.
LDR:03217nmm a2200361K 4500 001 2356096
005 20230612071816.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2020 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798209811251
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28992391
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Portugal1040086347
035 $a AAI28992391
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Alasgarov, Amir Elxan Oglu. $3 3696566
245 1 0 $a Seismic Design According to Eurocode 8 and AZDTN 2.3-1 Code : $b Case Study of Multistorey Building in Baku.
264 0 $c 2020
300 $a 1 online resource (133 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Pereira, Joao Paulo Veludo Vieira ; Rodrigues, Hugo Filipe Pinheiro ; Oglu, Khalid Mehemmed.
502 $a Thesis (Master's)--Instituto Politecnico de Leiria (Portugal), 2020.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Detailed and entire research in the comparison of seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures under European seismic code and Azerbaijan seismic code are not yet provided. However, there are big interests from the Azerbaijan Republic to involve European codes as state construction norms in Azerbaijan. Because of this, comparison has been made to help Azerbaijan move to European Standards.The following aspects were taken into account in order to make a comparison of seismic codes: design states, structural types, ground conditions, important classes, seismic zones, horizontal elastic response spectrum, base shear force and distribution of the horizontal seismic forces. Chapter 4 compares results of the case study in Chapter 3. To make a seismic analysis, the existing constructed structure was taken into account to apply seismic codes of Europe and Azerbaijan. The Robot Structural Analysis software was used for modelling structure and analysing it behaviour and results.The several aspects of both seismic codes are quite similar, such as design limit states, seismic zones, but the most similar aspect observed in the research is that of the characteristics of ground types. The almost 80% of difference in base shear force is observed for studied building. Also, studies show that Azerbaijan code is much more conservative in terms of shape of elastic response spectrum in poor soil conditions than European seismic code.Basically, overall results of research show that Azerbaijan Construction Norms, in terms of seismic design, are much more conservative in all aspects comparing with European codes. The main reason for this is the high seismicity of number of regions of Azerbaijan. Also, to consider is the cost of construction materials in Azerbaijan is way less that the cost in Europe.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Load. $3 3562902
650 4 $a Masonry. $3 685951
650 4 $a Clay. $3 537738
650 4 $a Concrete. $3 666349
650 4 $a Earthquakes. $3 535233
650 4 $a Seismic engineering. $3 3561056
650 4 $a Deformation. $2 lcstt $3 3267001
650 4 $a Reinforced concrete. $3 861675
650 4 $a Bridges. $3 868720
650 4 $a Building construction. $3 2071835
650 4 $a Vibration. $3 544256
650 4 $a Civil engineering. $3 860360
650 4 $a Architectural engineering. $3 3174102
650 4 $a Geophysics. $3 535228
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0729
690 $a 0543
690 $a 0462
690 $a 0467
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a Instituto Politecnico de Leiria (Portugal). $3 3681527
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-09B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28992391 $z click for full text (PQDT)