東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Twitter Posts, Gist, and the Perceived Harmfulness of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Twitter Posts, Gist, and the Perceived Harmfulness of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine./
Author:	Coffman, Candice Fawn.
Description:	1 online resource (147 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-12.
Subject:	Psychology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28964548click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798819385753

Twitter Posts, Gist, and the Perceived Harmfulness of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine.
Coffman, Candice Fawn.

Twitter Posts, Gist, and the Perceived Harmfulness of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine. - 1 online resource (147 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12.

Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Texas at El Paso, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Individuals frequently encounter two types of information when evaluating the risk of a vaccination: statistical evidence describing the frequency of positive and negative outcomes, and anecdotal evidence describing positive and negative personal experiences. The present study evaluated the relative importance of both types of evidence when considered simultaneously. We predicted that the presentation of even one negative anecdote would have an effect on the key risk information (the 'gist') that subjects extracted from the statistical and anecdotal data. Self-generated twitter posts (tweets) and standard measures of perceived risk were used to test the latter prediction. The current findings partially supported our predictions. Negative anecdotal evidence weighed more heavily in the decision to be vaccinated against HPV than justified by base-rate evidence. Notably, anecdotal evidence did not impact perceived risk of experiencing a normal or bad reaction to the vaccine. These findings suggest that counteracting negative anecdotal information regarding the HPV vaccine found online may increase campaign efficacy.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2023

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798819385753Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

AnecdotesIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

Twitter Posts, Gist, and the Perceived Harmfulness of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine.
LDR:02505nmm a2200409K 4500 001 2354381
005 20230414084742.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 241011s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798819385753
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28964548
035 $a AAI28964548
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Coffman, Candice Fawn. $3 3694733
245 1 0 $a Twitter Posts, Gist, and the Perceived Harmfulness of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (147 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12.
500 $a Advisor: Cohn, Lawrence.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Texas at El Paso, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Individuals frequently encounter two types of information when evaluating the risk of a vaccination: statistical evidence describing the frequency of positive and negative outcomes, and anecdotal evidence describing positive and negative personal experiences. The present study evaluated the relative importance of both types of evidence when considered simultaneously. We predicted that the presentation of even one negative anecdote would have an effect on the key risk information (the 'gist') that subjects extracted from the statistical and anecdotal data. Self-generated twitter posts (tweets) and standard measures of perceived risk were used to test the latter prediction. The current findings partially supported our predictions. Negative anecdotal evidence weighed more heavily in the decision to be vaccinated against HPV than justified by base-rate evidence. Notably, anecdotal evidence did not impact perceived risk of experiencing a normal or bad reaction to the vaccine. These findings suggest that counteracting negative anecdotal information regarding the HPV vaccine found online may increase campaign efficacy.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2023
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Public health. $3 534748
650 4 $a Vaccines. $3 684854
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
650 4 $a Human papillomavirus. $3 3682467
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
653 $a Anecdotes
653 $a Base rate
653 $a HPV
653 $a Human papillomavirus
653 $a Statistical Information
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0646
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 783688
710 2 $a The University of Texas at El Paso. $b Experimental Psych. $3 3694734
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-12.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28964548 $z click for full text (PQDT)