東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Knowledge Controversies and Renewable Energy Transition: Exploring Science and Policy Debates.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Knowledge Controversies and Renewable Energy Transition: Exploring Science and Policy Debates./
作者:	Taylor, Jennifer Lynda.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	164 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-09B.
標題:	Geography. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28865499
ISBN:	9798209903901

Knowledge Controversies and Renewable Energy Transition: Exploring Science and Policy Debates.
Taylor, Jennifer Lynda.

Knowledge Controversies and Renewable Energy Transition: Exploring Science and Policy Debates. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 164 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation explores controversies arising from policies to promote a transition to greater reliance on wind and solar power in Ontario, Canada. Drawing on conceptual frameworks from science and technology studies (STS), human geography and socio-technical transition studies, it provides new insights into the dynamics and impact of debates over the cost and environmental impacts of "new" renewable energies, as well as the role and nature of social resistance in the context of emergent concepts of energy democracy. This dissertation comprises three standalone articles (chapters 3-5). Chapter 3 uses rhetorical analysis to explore how scientific facts about wind energy's impact on human health were co-produced by the science and policy processes. It suggests the wind and health controversy cannot be definitively settled by science because it is inextricably tied to value-based questions about how precautionary wind development should be, what should count as a valid health issue, and what constitutes valid evidence in health research and public policy. Chapter 4 explores how the (in)visibility of different causal frames of the issue of rising electricity prices was mediated through a decade of newspaper coverage in Ontario. It demonstrates how coverage framed the issue of rising electricity prices overwhelmingly as a consequence of the Green Energy and Green Economy Act, 2009, amplifying criticisms of its design and impact on consumers and the economy while diminishing the visibility of other key cost-related factors. Chapter 5 presents a comparative assessment of normative and relational frameworks of energy democracy and their different accounts of resistant publics in energy transitions. It finds normative understandings constrain imaginings of low-carbon energy futures and who legitimately participates in democracy, overlooking uncertainties and complexities inherent to transitions and their publics. Relational approaches address these shortcomings through greater attention to how energy problems and solutions are framed, how political action is performed through the articulation of contested issues, and who is disenfranchised in transition processes. Findings highlight the importance of studying in-depth the co-production and mediation of knowledge and how publics struggle to gain political authority over issues that affect them when investigating trajectories and outcomes of renewable energy transitions. .

ISBN: 9798209903901Subjects--Topical Terms:

524010
Geography.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Knowledge co-production

Knowledge Controversies and Renewable Energy Transition: Exploring Science and Policy Debates.
LDR:03653nmm a2200361 4500 001 2352051
005 20221111121004.5
008 241004s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798209903901
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28865499
035 $a AAI28865499
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Taylor, Jennifer Lynda. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-8301-3434 $3 3691665
245 1 0 $a Knowledge Controversies and Renewable Energy Transition: Exploring Science and Policy Debates.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 164 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-09, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Klenk, Nicole.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation explores controversies arising from policies to promote a transition to greater reliance on wind and solar power in Ontario, Canada. Drawing on conceptual frameworks from science and technology studies (STS), human geography and socio-technical transition studies, it provides new insights into the dynamics and impact of debates over the cost and environmental impacts of "new" renewable energies, as well as the role and nature of social resistance in the context of emergent concepts of energy democracy. This dissertation comprises three standalone articles (chapters 3-5). Chapter 3 uses rhetorical analysis to explore how scientific facts about wind energy's impact on human health were co-produced by the science and policy processes. It suggests the wind and health controversy cannot be definitively settled by science because it is inextricably tied to value-based questions about how precautionary wind development should be, what should count as a valid health issue, and what constitutes valid evidence in health research and public policy. Chapter 4 explores how the (in)visibility of different causal frames of the issue of rising electricity prices was mediated through a decade of newspaper coverage in Ontario. It demonstrates how coverage framed the issue of rising electricity prices overwhelmingly as a consequence of the Green Energy and Green Economy Act, 2009, amplifying criticisms of its design and impact on consumers and the economy while diminishing the visibility of other key cost-related factors. Chapter 5 presents a comparative assessment of normative and relational frameworks of energy democracy and their different accounts of resistant publics in energy transitions. It finds normative understandings constrain imaginings of low-carbon energy futures and who legitimately participates in democracy, overlooking uncertainties and complexities inherent to transitions and their publics. Relational approaches address these shortcomings through greater attention to how energy problems and solutions are framed, how political action is performed through the articulation of contested issues, and who is disenfranchised in transition processes. Findings highlight the importance of studying in-depth the co-production and mediation of knowledge and how publics struggle to gain political authority over issues that affect them when investigating trajectories and outcomes of renewable energy transitions. .
590 $a School code: 0779.
650 4 $a Geography. $3 524010
650 4 $a Energy. $3 876794
650 4 $a Environmental studies. $3 2122803
653 $a Knowledge co-production
653 $a Knowledge controversies
653 $a Renewable energy transition
653 $a Science and technology studies
690 $a 0366
690 $a 0791
690 $a 0477
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $b Geography. $3 2122921
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-09B.
790 $a 0779
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28865499