東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Impact of Automation Etiquette on User Performance and Trust in Non-Personified Technology.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Impact of Automation Etiquette on User Performance and Trust in Non-Personified Technology./
作者:	Guyton, Zachary J.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	65 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-12.
標題:	Psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28417690
ISBN:	9798515233693

The Impact of Automation Etiquette on User Performance and Trust in Non-Personified Technology.
Guyton, Zachary J.

The Impact of Automation Etiquette on User Performance and Trust in Non-Personified Technology. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 65 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12.

Thesis (M.S.)--Clemson University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Previous research has shown that good automation etiquette can yield positive effects on user performance, trust, satisfaction, and motivation. Automation etiquette is especially influential in personified technologies - users have increased etiquette expectations from technology that has human characteristics. Designers deliberately integrate etiquette into personified technologies to account for users' anthropomorphization and meet user needs. The current study examined the impact of etiquette in non-personified technologies. The study aimed to demonstrate that automation etiquette also affects performance, trust, perceived workload, and motivation in technologies that possess little to no human characteristics. The study used a computer-based automation task to examine good and bad etiquette models and different domain-based perceived task-importance, or "criticality" levels (between-subjects) that contained various stages of automation and automation reliability levels (within-subjects). The study found that bad etiquette automation produced better performance in certain conditions. Confirming previous research, we found that users trust good etiquette automation more than bad etiquette automation in some trust categories. This study provides evidence that automation complexity correlates with automation etiquette's impact - as automation complexity increases, so does automation etiquette's impact on performance and in some cases trust. We found that bad automation etiquette can increase user's subjective workload. Last, we confirmed that our domain-based task criticality manipulation was effective. Future research should examine additional domains, tasks, etiquette delivery mechanisms, and etiquette scales coupled with varied degrees of automation complexity to better understand etiquette's role in human-automation interaction.

ISBN: 9798515233693Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Automation etiquette

The Impact of Automation Etiquette on User Performance and Trust in Non-Personified Technology.
LDR:03051nmm a2200397 4500 001 2350019
005 20221020123833.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798515233693
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28417690
035 $a AAI28417690
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Guyton, Zachary J. $3 3689456
245 1 4 $a The Impact of Automation Etiquette on User Performance and Trust in Non-Personified Technology.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 65 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12.
500 $a Advisor: Pak, Richard.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Clemson University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Previous research has shown that good automation etiquette can yield positive effects on user performance, trust, satisfaction, and motivation. Automation etiquette is especially influential in personified technologies - users have increased etiquette expectations from technology that has human characteristics. Designers deliberately integrate etiquette into personified technologies to account for users' anthropomorphization and meet user needs. The current study examined the impact of etiquette in non-personified technologies. The study aimed to demonstrate that automation etiquette also affects performance, trust, perceived workload, and motivation in technologies that possess little to no human characteristics. The study used a computer-based automation task to examine good and bad etiquette models and different domain-based perceived task-importance, or "criticality" levels (between-subjects) that contained various stages of automation and automation reliability levels (within-subjects). The study found that bad etiquette automation produced better performance in certain conditions. Confirming previous research, we found that users trust good etiquette automation more than bad etiquette automation in some trust categories. This study provides evidence that automation complexity correlates with automation etiquette's impact - as automation complexity increases, so does automation etiquette's impact on performance and in some cases trust. We found that bad automation etiquette can increase user's subjective workload. Last, we confirmed that our domain-based task criticality manipulation was effective. Future research should examine additional domains, tasks, etiquette delivery mechanisms, and etiquette scales coupled with varied degrees of automation complexity to better understand etiquette's role in human-automation interaction.
590 $a School code: 0050.
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Industrial engineering. $3 526216
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
653 $a Automation etiquette
653 $a Criticality
653 $a User performance
653 $a Trust
653 $a Non-Personified Technology
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0546
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a Clemson University. $b Human Factors Psychology. $3 3689457
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-12.
790 $a 0050
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28417690