東華大學圖書館 |

Single brand with multiple country images: The effect of discrepancies between country images on brand credibility and prestige.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Single brand with multiple country images: The effect of discrepancies between country images on brand credibility and prestige./
Author:	Woo, Hongjoo.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2016,
Description:	238 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International78-03A.
Subject:	Research. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10154642
ISBN:	9781369097351

Single brand with multiple country images: The effect of discrepancies between country images on brand credibility and prestige.
Woo, Hongjoo.

Single brand with multiple country images: The effect of discrepancies between country images on brand credibility and prestige. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 - 238 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 2016.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Country image refers to the holistic image that consumers harbor toward a particular country. Traditionally, one brand was thought to possess a single country image; an Italian brand would theoretically be owned by an Italian company and manufacture its products in Italy. However, due to increasingly common practices of cross-border merger and acquisition (M&A) and offshoring practices, most brands today can have multiple country images for a single branded item, which include the decomposed labels of country-of-brand origin (COB), country-of-company (COC), and country-of-manufacturing (COM). Due to cross-border M&A and offshoring, the COC or COM can shift from its home country to another country in two different directions: downward (a high fashion image country → a low fashion image country) and upward (a low fashion image country → a high fashion image country). When consumers are exposed to the information that the COC or COM of a brand actually differs from its COB, what reactions will appear in consumers' minds? How do such reactions affect consumers' brand evaluations? Do such effects differ between luxury brands and mass market brands or between the downward and upward shifts of country images? To address these questions, this study examined the effects of discrepancies in country image on consumers' perceived brand credibility and prestige in the fashion industry context, examining both luxury and mass market brands and both downward and upward scenarios of M&A/offshoring. The moderating role of consumers' clothing product involvement was also tested. Using research gained from literature review, a total of twenty hypotheses (H1a-H9h) were developed based upon two specific theories. Festinger's (1957) cognitive dissonance theory suggests that when consumers encounter discrepancies in country image, they will modify their brand evaluations to liberate themselves from the resulting cognitive dissonance. Homans's (1958) social exchange theory suggests that the impact of discrepant country images, however, would be significant for luxury brands but not for mass market brands, due to consumers' differing levels of input with regard to each brand purchase. For hypotheses testing, 426 college students were randomly assigned to one of the four experimental studies (Study 1 - Study 4), which collectively manipulated eight scenarios: luxury/mass market brand (2) x downward/upward (2) x M&A/offshoring cases (2). Italy and China were selected to represent high and low fashion image countries respectively, and the images of four fictitious brands (Italian/Chinese luxury/mass market brands) were developed through pre-tests and used in the experiments. In the experiments, changes in the participants' perceived brand fsscredibility and prestige before and after the manipulation of the scenarios were examined using repeated-measure ANOVA. The results of the data analyses provided support for six of the twenty hypotheses. The downward shifts in the COC/COM manipulated by M&A and offshoring scenarios significantly decreased the brand credibility and prestige of luxury brands (H1a, H1b, H5a, H5b supported). However, the downward shifts in the COC/COM also decreased mass market brands' credibility, thus refuting H3 and H7. The upward shifts of the COC/COM through M&A and offshoring did not significantly increase brand credibility and prestige, neither for luxury brands (H2a, H2b, H6a, H6b not supported) nor for mass market brands (H4 and H8 supported). Consumers' clothing product involvement did not exhibit a significant moderating effect in the experiments (H9a-H9h not supported). These findings suggest that consumers generally act in negative ways toward downward shifts in country image, regardless of brand tiers. Moreover, upward shifts in country image-for instance, the acquisition by a foreign company from a high fashion image country or the manufacturing of products in a high fashion image country-cannot by themselves improve the original image of brands from a low fashion image country, regardless of brand tiers. These patterns were common to all consumers, with no significant difference based on their individual involvement with clothes. These findings provide empirical evidence regarding whether cognitive dissonance theory or social exchange theory can explain the phenomena of country image effects. In addition, these findings fill gaps in the country image literature by examining the impact of country image shifts in both downward and upward directions, while also comparing the impact across brand tiers by focusing on brand-level outcomes (i.e., brand credibility and prestige). It also suggests managerial implications, such as the development of communication strategies for fashion brands that minimize downward shifts in country image. Limitations for the study and suggestions for future studies are also discussed.

ISBN: 9781369097351Subjects--Topical Terms:

531893
Research.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Branding

Single brand with multiple country images: The effect of discrepancies between country images on brand credibility and prestige.
LDR:06204nmm a2200397 4500 001 2348756
005 20220908125412.5
008 241004s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369097351
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10154642
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uncg:12034
035 $a AAI10154642
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Woo, Hongjoo. $3 3688122
245 1 0 $a Single brand with multiple country images: The effect of discrepancies between country images on brand credibility and prestige.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2016
300 $a 238 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 78-03, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Jin, Byoungho.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 2016.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Country image refers to the holistic image that consumers harbor toward a particular country. Traditionally, one brand was thought to possess a single country image; an Italian brand would theoretically be owned by an Italian company and manufacture its products in Italy. However, due to increasingly common practices of cross-border merger and acquisition (M&A) and offshoring practices, most brands today can have multiple country images for a single branded item, which include the decomposed labels of country-of-brand origin (COB), country-of-company (COC), and country-of-manufacturing (COM). Due to cross-border M&A and offshoring, the COC or COM can shift from its home country to another country in two different directions: downward (a high fashion image country → a low fashion image country) and upward (a low fashion image country → a high fashion image country). When consumers are exposed to the information that the COC or COM of a brand actually differs from its COB, what reactions will appear in consumers' minds? How do such reactions affect consumers' brand evaluations? Do such effects differ between luxury brands and mass market brands or between the downward and upward shifts of country images? To address these questions, this study examined the effects of discrepancies in country image on consumers' perceived brand credibility and prestige in the fashion industry context, examining both luxury and mass market brands and both downward and upward scenarios of M&A/offshoring. The moderating role of consumers' clothing product involvement was also tested. Using research gained from literature review, a total of twenty hypotheses (H1a-H9h) were developed based upon two specific theories. Festinger's (1957) cognitive dissonance theory suggests that when consumers encounter discrepancies in country image, they will modify their brand evaluations to liberate themselves from the resulting cognitive dissonance. Homans's (1958) social exchange theory suggests that the impact of discrepant country images, however, would be significant for luxury brands but not for mass market brands, due to consumers' differing levels of input with regard to each brand purchase. For hypotheses testing, 426 college students were randomly assigned to one of the four experimental studies (Study 1 - Study 4), which collectively manipulated eight scenarios: luxury/mass market brand (2) x downward/upward (2) x M&A/offshoring cases (2). Italy and China were selected to represent high and low fashion image countries respectively, and the images of four fictitious brands (Italian/Chinese luxury/mass market brands) were developed through pre-tests and used in the experiments. In the experiments, changes in the participants' perceived brand fsscredibility and prestige before and after the manipulation of the scenarios were examined using repeated-measure ANOVA. The results of the data analyses provided support for six of the twenty hypotheses. The downward shifts in the COC/COM manipulated by M&A and offshoring scenarios significantly decreased the brand credibility and prestige of luxury brands (H1a, H1b, H5a, H5b supported). However, the downward shifts in the COC/COM also decreased mass market brands' credibility, thus refuting H3 and H7. The upward shifts of the COC/COM through M&A and offshoring did not significantly increase brand credibility and prestige, neither for luxury brands (H2a, H2b, H6a, H6b not supported) nor for mass market brands (H4 and H8 supported). Consumers' clothing product involvement did not exhibit a significant moderating effect in the experiments (H9a-H9h not supported). These findings suggest that consumers generally act in negative ways toward downward shifts in country image, regardless of brand tiers. Moreover, upward shifts in country image-for instance, the acquisition by a foreign company from a high fashion image country or the manufacturing of products in a high fashion image country-cannot by themselves improve the original image of brands from a low fashion image country, regardless of brand tiers. These patterns were common to all consumers, with no significant difference based on their individual involvement with clothes. These findings provide empirical evidence regarding whether cognitive dissonance theory or social exchange theory can explain the phenomena of country image effects. In addition, these findings fill gaps in the country image literature by examining the impact of country image shifts in both downward and upward directions, while also comparing the impact across brand tiers by focusing on brand-level outcomes (i.e., brand credibility and prestige). It also suggests managerial implications, such as the development of communication strategies for fashion brands that minimize downward shifts in country image. Limitations for the study and suggestions for future studies are also discussed.
590 $a School code: 0154.
650 4 $a Research. $3 531893
650 4 $a Manufacturing. $3 3389707
650 4 $a Success. $3 518195
650 4 $a Trends. $3 3560051
650 4 $a Credibility. $3 3560860
650 4 $a Families & family life. $3 3422406
650 4 $a Decomposition. $3 3561186
650 4 $a Data analysis. $2 bisacsh $3 3515250
650 4 $a Advisors. $3 3560734
650 4 $a Fashion. $3 549143
650 4 $a Perceptions. $3 3435328
650 4 $a Hypotheses. $3 3560118
650 4 $a Experiments. $3 525909
650 4 $a Knowledge. $3 872758
650 4 $a Clothing. $3 3682213
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Data collection. $3 3561708
650 4 $a Role models. $3 3301554
650 4 $a Attitudes. $3 1973410
653 $a Branding
653 $a Consumer
653 $a Country image
653 $a M&A
653 $a Offshoring
690 $a 0338
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0200
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. $b Consumer, Apparel, and Retail Studies. $3 3171395
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 78-03A.
790 $a 0154
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10154642