東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Virtual Interactive Notebooking with Gifted Learners in an Inquiry-Based Social Studies Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Action Research Study on Higher-Order Thinking and Student Motivation.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Virtual Interactive Notebooking with Gifted Learners in an Inquiry-Based Social Studies Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Action Research Study on Higher-Order Thinking and Student Motivation./
Author:	Meyers, Brandy Cooper.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
Description:	266 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-04A.
Subject:	Educational technology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28321044
ISBN:	9798538141340

Virtual Interactive Notebooking with Gifted Learners in an Inquiry-Based Social Studies Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Action Research Study on Higher-Order Thinking and Student Motivation.
Meyers, Brandy Cooper.

Virtual Interactive Notebooking with Gifted Learners in an Inquiry-Based Social Studies Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Action Research Study on Higher-Order Thinking and Student Motivation. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 266 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of South Carolina, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purpose of this mixed methods action research was to implement and evaluate the use of virtual interactive notebooks with gifted students in a 4th grade social studies classroom. Specifically, this study focused on two overarching research questions: (a) how does the implementation of virtual interactive notebooks in an inquiry based, constructivist learning environment impact the use of higher-order thinking skills (according to Webb's Depth of Knowledge) of gifted learners in a fourth-grade social studies classroom and (b) how does the implementation of virtual interactive notebooks in an inquiry-based, constructivist learning environment impact motivation of gifted learners in a fourth-grade social studies classroom?This study utilized technology and an inquiry-based approach to learning as students (n=23) created their own personalized virtual interactive notebooks. Qualitative and quantitative data was collected in order to determine the impact virtual interactive notebooks had on student use of higher-order thinking skills and student motivation. skills, student interviews, and a pre-and post-questionnaire on motivation. Specifically, data was analyzed through a convergent parallel mixed methods approach as it allows the researcher to merge both types of data to provide a comprehensive analysis of the study (Creswell, 2014). Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation tests. Qualitative data were analyzed through inductive and deductive coding. A thematic analysis of codes resulted in five themes: (1) student perceptions of themselves as learners evolved, (2) students experienced a shift in power from teacher to student, (3) students were empowered and motivated to learn through student choice, (4) students embraced, spoke, and lived the inquiry process, and (5) students experienced a shift in their knowledge acquisition process.Findings indicate that virtual interactive notebooks improved student use of higher-order thinking skills and student motivation. Students were able to create personalized notebook pages that demonstrated their understanding of each topic. Students experienced individualized learning as they utilized choice in their personal inquiries. Students found having the freedom to engage in inquiries motivating to them as learners. Students utilized higher-order thinking skills as they conducted researched in their inquiry, synthesized information and formed a new understanding, and created their notebook pages. Implications and limitations of the study are provided.

ISBN: 9798538141340Subjects--Topical Terms:

517670
Educational technology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Choice

Virtual Interactive Notebooking with Gifted Learners in an Inquiry-Based Social Studies Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Action Research Study on Higher-Order Thinking and Student Motivation.
LDR:03876nmm a2200385 4500 001 2348567
005 20220912135608.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798538141340
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28321044
035 $a AAI28321044
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Meyers, Brandy Cooper. $3 3687931
245 1 0 $a Virtual Interactive Notebooking with Gifted Learners in an Inquiry-Based Social Studies Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Action Research Study on Higher-Order Thinking and Student Motivation.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 266 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Morris, William.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of South Carolina, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this mixed methods action research was to implement and evaluate the use of virtual interactive notebooks with gifted students in a 4th grade social studies classroom. Specifically, this study focused on two overarching research questions: (a) how does the implementation of virtual interactive notebooks in an inquiry based, constructivist learning environment impact the use of higher-order thinking skills (according to Webb's Depth of Knowledge) of gifted learners in a fourth-grade social studies classroom and (b) how does the implementation of virtual interactive notebooks in an inquiry-based, constructivist learning environment impact motivation of gifted learners in a fourth-grade social studies classroom?This study utilized technology and an inquiry-based approach to learning as students (n=23) created their own personalized virtual interactive notebooks. Qualitative and quantitative data was collected in order to determine the impact virtual interactive notebooks had on student use of higher-order thinking skills and student motivation. skills, student interviews, and a pre-and post-questionnaire on motivation. Specifically, data was analyzed through a convergent parallel mixed methods approach as it allows the researcher to merge both types of data to provide a comprehensive analysis of the study (Creswell, 2014). Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation tests. Qualitative data were analyzed through inductive and deductive coding. A thematic analysis of codes resulted in five themes: (1) student perceptions of themselves as learners evolved, (2) students experienced a shift in power from teacher to student, (3) students were empowered and motivated to learn through student choice, (4) students embraced, spoke, and lived the inquiry process, and (5) students experienced a shift in their knowledge acquisition process.Findings indicate that virtual interactive notebooks improved student use of higher-order thinking skills and student motivation. Students were able to create personalized notebook pages that demonstrated their understanding of each topic. Students experienced individualized learning as they utilized choice in their personal inquiries. Students found having the freedom to engage in inquiries motivating to them as learners. Students utilized higher-order thinking skills as they conducted researched in their inquiry, synthesized information and formed a new understanding, and created their notebook pages. Implications and limitations of the study are provided.
590 $a School code: 0202.
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Students. $3 756581
650 4 $a Collaboration. $3 3556296
650 4 $a Teaching methods. $3 595505
650 4 $a Constructivism. $3 3563801
650 4 $a Science. $3 516376
650 4 $a Writing. $3 551664
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
650 4 $a School environment. $3 541935
650 4 $a Gifted children. $3 636647
650 4 $a Data analysis. $2 bisacsh $3 3515250
650 4 $a Cognitive ability. $3 3560491
650 4 $a Gifted education. $3 3172499
650 4 $a Core curriculum. $3 3559991
650 4 $a Feedback. $3 677181
650 4 $a Teachers. $3 529573
650 4 $a Cognition & reasoning. $3 3556293
650 4 $a Bias. $2 gtt $3 1374837
650 4 $a Academic standards. $3 3687153
650 4 $a Motivation. $3 532704
650 4 $a Action research. $3 529613
650 4 $a Knowledge. $3 872758
650 4 $a Data collection. $3 3561708
650 4 $a Metacognition. $3 521861
650 4 $a Critical thinking. $3 530830
650 4 $a Learning. $3 516521
653 $a Choice
653 $a Depth of Knowledge
653 $a High-order thinking
653 $a Inquiry
653 $a Motivation
653 $a Virtual interactive notebooking
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0445
690 $a 0279
710 2 $a University of South Carolina. $b Curriculum and Instruction. $3 1682098
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-04A.
790 $a 0202
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28321044