東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Surface Treatment Effects on Shear Bond Strength and Biaxial Flexural Strength of Three Generations of Zirconia.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Surface Treatment Effects on Shear Bond Strength and Biaxial Flexural Strength of Three Generations of Zirconia./
Author:	Darkoue, Yasko A.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
Description:	82 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-05.
Subject:	Dentistry. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22588083
ISBN:	9781088367605

Surface Treatment Effects on Shear Bond Strength and Biaxial Flexural Strength of Three Generations of Zirconia.
Darkoue, Yasko A.

Surface Treatment Effects on Shear Bond Strength and Biaxial Flexural Strength of Three Generations of Zirconia. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 82 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05.

Thesis (M.Dent.)--The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Objectives: Mechanical and chemical surface treatments are required to achieve a durable bond to zirconia. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of particle abrasion and pressure on shear bond strength and biaxial flexural strength of Lava (Frame, Plus and Esthetic) zirconia to obtain a favorable combination of pressure and particle type to produce optimum strength and optimize the bond produced. A protocol for mechanical treatment balancing strength of the type zirconia and bond to create the best bond with the least reduction in strength is the desired goal of this study.Methods: 420 sintered zirconia discs of Lava (Frame, Plus and Esthetic) were produced and the specimens of each material were randomly distributed into 14 groups (n=10). Half of these groups (210 specimens) were tested for shear bond strength while the remaining specimens were tested for biaxial flexural strength. One group in each of the seven groups served as the control which received no surface treatment. The experimental groups were particle abraded on one surface by 50 microns (u) alumina or glass beads at distance of 10mm for 10 seconds using three different pressures (15, 30, and 45 psi) according. After particle abrasion the specimens for shear bond strength test were sonicated for 2 minutes in water and the abraded surface thoroughly dried with compressed air for 30 seconds. A tube filled with Panavia SA cement was placed onto the surface and light cured from top and two sides for 10 seconds per surface (total 30 seconds). The specimens were water stored in an incubator at 37°C for 24 hours and then placed into an Instron Testing Machine and loaded in shear until failure. Shear bond strength was calculated from the bonding area and the peak failure load.For the biaxial flexural strength testing, the thickness of each specimen with the same surface treatment as the bond strength specimens was measured by a digital caliber and placed in a fixture mounted on the Instron and loaded to failure. Biaxial flexural strength was calculated by applying a specific equation according to the biaxial flexural strength test (ISO standard 6872).Results: Significant differences were seen between surface treatments (p<.01), materials (p<.01) and their interaction (p<.01). Materials in each column with different letters are statistically different.[Special characters omitted]With alumina particle abrasion, higher pressure produced higher bonds for Lava Frame and Lava Plus zirconia while the bond of Lava Esthetic declined with increased pressure.[Special characters omitted]The higher the pressure with alumina the lower the strength with 5mol% yttria containing Lava Esthetic zirconiaConclusions: Alumina produced a significantly better combination of bond strength while maintaining the biaxial strength of all zirconia than glass beads. The recommended pressure for surface treatment prior to bonding Lava Frame, Lava Plus and Lava Esthetic zirconia are 45 psi, 30 psi and 15 psi respectively.

ISBN: 9781088367605Subjects--Topical Terms:

828971
Dentistry.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Biaxial Flexural Strength

Surface Treatment Effects on Shear Bond Strength and Biaxial Flexural Strength of Three Generations of Zirconia.
LDR:04314nmm a2200421 4500 001 2347745
005 20230509065451.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 241004s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781088367605
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI22588083
035 $a AAI22588083
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Darkoue, Yasko A. $3 3687039
245 1 0 $a Surface Treatment Effects on Shear Bond Strength and Biaxial Flexural Strength of Three Generations of Zirconia.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 82 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05.
500 $a Advisor: Burgess, John O.
502 $a Thesis (M.Dent.)--The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Objectives: Mechanical and chemical surface treatments are required to achieve a durable bond to zirconia. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of particle abrasion and pressure on shear bond strength and biaxial flexural strength of Lava (Frame, Plus and Esthetic) zirconia to obtain a favorable combination of pressure and particle type to produce optimum strength and optimize the bond produced. A protocol for mechanical treatment balancing strength of the type zirconia and bond to create the best bond with the least reduction in strength is the desired goal of this study.Methods: 420 sintered zirconia discs of Lava (Frame, Plus and Esthetic) were produced and the specimens of each material were randomly distributed into 14 groups (n=10). Half of these groups (210 specimens) were tested for shear bond strength while the remaining specimens were tested for biaxial flexural strength. One group in each of the seven groups served as the control which received no surface treatment. The experimental groups were particle abraded on one surface by 50 microns (u) alumina or glass beads at distance of 10mm for 10 seconds using three different pressures (15, 30, and 45 psi) according. After particle abrasion the specimens for shear bond strength test were sonicated for 2 minutes in water and the abraded surface thoroughly dried with compressed air for 30 seconds. A tube filled with Panavia SA cement was placed onto the surface and light cured from top and two sides for 10 seconds per surface (total 30 seconds). The specimens were water stored in an incubator at 37°C for 24 hours and then placed into an Instron Testing Machine and loaded in shear until failure. Shear bond strength was calculated from the bonding area and the peak failure load.For the biaxial flexural strength testing, the thickness of each specimen with the same surface treatment as the bond strength specimens was measured by a digital caliber and placed in a fixture mounted on the Instron and loaded to failure. Biaxial flexural strength was calculated by applying a specific equation according to the biaxial flexural strength test (ISO standard 6872).Results: Significant differences were seen between surface treatments (p<.01), materials (p<.01) and their interaction (p<.01). Materials in each column with different letters are statistically different.[Special characters omitted]With alumina particle abrasion, higher pressure produced higher bonds for Lava Frame and Lava Plus zirconia while the bond of Lava Esthetic declined with increased pressure.[Special characters omitted]The higher the pressure with alumina the lower the strength with 5mol% yttria containing Lava Esthetic zirconiaConclusions: Alumina produced a significantly better combination of bond strength while maintaining the biaxial strength of all zirconia than glass beads. The recommended pressure for surface treatment prior to bonding Lava Frame, Lava Plus and Lava Esthetic zirconia are 45 psi, 30 psi and 15 psi respectively.
590 $a School code: 0005.
650 4 $a Dentistry. $3 828971
650 4 $a Physiology. $3 518431
650 4 $a Public health. $3 534748
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
653 $a Biaxial Flexural Strength
653 $a Bonding
653 $a Sandblasting
653 $a Shear Bond Strength
653 $a Surface Treatment
653 $a Zirconia
690 $a 0567
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0719
710 2 $a The University of Alabama at Birmingham. $b Dentistry. $3 3347473
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-05.
790 $a 0005
791 $a M.Dent.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22588083