東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Exploring Lecturer's Translations and Negotiations of Inclusive Practice in Post- 1992 English Universities.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Exploring Lecturer's Translations and Negotiations of Inclusive Practice in Post- 1992 English Universities./
Author:	Soulby, Karen.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
Description:	225 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-02B.
Subject:	Sexual orientation. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28550793
ISBN:	9798522941147

Exploring Lecturer's Translations and Negotiations of Inclusive Practice in Post- 1992 English Universities.
Soulby, Karen.

Exploring Lecturer's Translations and Negotiations of Inclusive Practice in Post- 1992 English Universities. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 225 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Sheffield Hallam University (United Kingdom), 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Since the Equality Act (2010), English universities have been compelled to address issues of inequality as experienced by groups of students with legally protected characteristics. Developing a policy of inclusive practice (IP) was one way in which universities tried to address this. However, despite this legislation and policy, differential outcomes have persisted for most disadvantaged student groups, with little improvement. Almost ten years on from the implementation of legislation, this research seeks to extend and contribute to academic debates on how to reduce differential outcomes and make English universities more equitable.The aim of this research was to explore the enactment of IP as a policy from the perspective of lecturers as they negotiate university policy, structures and processes. The research explored the extent to which lecturers understand, interpret and implement IP and how they engage with university policy and processes aimed at supporting the development of IP. Underpinned by a sociological policy enactment approach, the research design took a critical realist stance and used qualitative in-depth interviews to collect data with 19 lecturers at 3 universities across England. Using thematic data analysis, the study found that lecturers experience everyday 'dilemmas of practice' involving inclusion which are often unresolved. Influencing those dilemmas are the contingencies of situated contexts that inform, constrain and shape lecturers' choices in how they practice. Themes revealed variable misunderstandings of IP based on deficit discourses, professional pragmatism (including a reliance on informal networks for professional development) and discomfort felt by policy actors. Furthermore, the research identified the important constraints of powerlessness, space and time on IP enactment. An unexpected theme emerged concerning affective responses from lecturers who appeared to experience anxiety, stress, feelings of inadequacy and self-doubt, and who felt unsupported in relation to the expectation placed upon them to achieve equality through their practice. This study has made a significant contribution to informing professional practice surrounding IP policy, extending knowledge to give a nuanced understanding of the constraints of the practice across several higher education institutions in England. It has extended an original sociological understanding of how policy is played out in English universities. The conclusion of the research is that the capacity of the lecturer to enact IP policy is overestimated, and must be accompanied by changes to institutional culture, structures and processes to achieve improvements in equality for students.

ISBN: 9798522941147Subjects--Topical Terms:

528809
Sexual orientation.

Exploring Lecturer's Translations and Negotiations of Inclusive Practice in Post- 1992 English Universities.
LDR:03970nmm a2200409 4500 001 2347350
005 20220722112723.5
008 241004s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798522941147
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28550793
035 $a (MiAaPQ)Sheff_Hall28510
035 $a AAI28550793
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Soulby, Karen. $3 3686582
245 1 0 $a Exploring Lecturer's Translations and Negotiations of Inclusive Practice in Post- 1992 English Universities.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 225 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Madriaga, Manuel;Fitzgerald, Damien.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Sheffield Hallam University (United Kingdom), 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Since the Equality Act (2010), English universities have been compelled to address issues of inequality as experienced by groups of students with legally protected characteristics. Developing a policy of inclusive practice (IP) was one way in which universities tried to address this. However, despite this legislation and policy, differential outcomes have persisted for most disadvantaged student groups, with little improvement. Almost ten years on from the implementation of legislation, this research seeks to extend and contribute to academic debates on how to reduce differential outcomes and make English universities more equitable.The aim of this research was to explore the enactment of IP as a policy from the perspective of lecturers as they negotiate university policy, structures and processes. The research explored the extent to which lecturers understand, interpret and implement IP and how they engage with university policy and processes aimed at supporting the development of IP. Underpinned by a sociological policy enactment approach, the research design took a critical realist stance and used qualitative in-depth interviews to collect data with 19 lecturers at 3 universities across England. Using thematic data analysis, the study found that lecturers experience everyday 'dilemmas of practice' involving inclusion which are often unresolved. Influencing those dilemmas are the contingencies of situated contexts that inform, constrain and shape lecturers' choices in how they practice. Themes revealed variable misunderstandings of IP based on deficit discourses, professional pragmatism (including a reliance on informal networks for professional development) and discomfort felt by policy actors. Furthermore, the research identified the important constraints of powerlessness, space and time on IP enactment. An unexpected theme emerged concerning affective responses from lecturers who appeared to experience anxiety, stress, feelings of inadequacy and self-doubt, and who felt unsupported in relation to the expectation placed upon them to achieve equality through their practice. This study has made a significant contribution to informing professional practice surrounding IP policy, extending knowledge to give a nuanced understanding of the constraints of the practice across several higher education institutions in England. It has extended an original sociological understanding of how policy is played out in English universities. The conclusion of the research is that the capacity of the lecturer to enact IP policy is overestimated, and must be accompanied by changes to institutional culture, structures and processes to achieve improvements in equality for students.
590 $a School code: 8818.
650 4 $a Sexual orientation. $3 528809
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Concept mapping. $3 1005822
650 4 $a Curricula. $3 3422445
650 4 $a Handicapped accessibility. $3 3681747
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
650 4 $a Gender. $3 2001319
650 4 $a Civil unions. $3 3686583
650 4 $a Colleges & universities. $3 3548279
650 4 $a Ethnicity. $3 519288
650 4 $a Disabled students. $3 3435346
650 4 $a Disability. $3 3556854
650 4 $a Social justice. $3 526845
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
650 4 $a Minority & ethnic groups. $3 3422415
650 4 $a Knowledge. $3 872758
650 4 $a Adjustment. $3 3680676
650 4 $a Gays & lesbians. $3 3563991
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Multiculturalism & pluralism. $3 3558958
650 4 $a Inequality. $3 3560119
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 543687
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Ethnic studies. $2 bicssc $3 1556779
650 4 $a LGBTQ studies. $3 2122706
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Sexuality. $3 816197
650 4 $a Data analysis. $2 bisacsh $3 3515250
650 4 $a Participation. $3 1555180
650 4 $a Learning. $3 516521
650 4 $a White people. $3 3686584
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0201
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0631
690 $a 0492
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0211
710 2 $a Sheffield Hallam University (United Kingdom). $3 3423993
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-02B.
790 $a 8818
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28550793