Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Three Essays on Environmental Justice in Georgia and Gentrification in Greenville, South Carolina.
Record Type:
Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Three Essays on Environmental Justice in Georgia and Gentrification in Greenville, South Carolina./
Author:
Arogundade, Temitope Mary.
Published:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
Description:
176 p.
Notes:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International82-12A.
Subject:
Environmental justice. -
Online resource:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28419641
ISBN:
9798516000171
Three Essays on Environmental Justice in Georgia and Gentrification in Greenville, South Carolina.
Arogundade, Temitope Mary.
Three Essays on Environmental Justice in Georgia and Gentrification in Greenville, South Carolina.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 176 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Clemson University, 2021.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Environmental justice research has found that poor and minority households are disproportionally exposed to environmental pollution than other groups in the United States. Scholars have used several hypotheses to explain this correlation including pure discrimination among groups by polluters, the location cost considerations of firms, the migratory responses of households to pollution, Coase theorem, and collective action hypotheses. This dissertation analyzes the question of "why the poor and minorities are more exposed to pollution" by testing the location cost and migration hypotheses using data from the state of Georgia. The dissertation also examined gentrification processes and impacts using Greenville, South Carolina as a case study and explores the link between gentrification, homelessness, and environmental justice.The location cost analysis employs a logistic regression model using secondary data at the census tract level on input costs, transportation costs, and firm location cost-related environmental justice factors, and tests the correlation of these factors with the location of toxic facilities. The migration analysis employs a 2-Stage Least Squares model to analyze whether migration explains the disproportionate exposure of poor and minority groups to pollution while the gentrification study employs qualitative interview and focus group methods to understand gentrification processes and impacts.Results show that while location cost explains some of the disproportionate exposure to pollution, migration does not appear to explain why the poor and minorities are more exposed to toxic facilities. In other words, the poor and minorities are not more exposed to toxic facilities because they migrated to live where those toxic facilities are but rather, location costs and other factors explain why these groups are more exposed to pollution.
ISBN: 9798516000171Subjects--Topical Terms:
528369
Environmental justice.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Community Development
Three Essays on Environmental Justice in Georgia and Gentrification in Greenville, South Carolina.
LDR
:03037nmm a2200361 4500
001
2347327
005
20220722112717.5
008
241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798516000171
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28419641
035
$a
AAI28419641
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Arogundade, Temitope Mary.
$3
3686550
245
1 0
$a
Three Essays on Environmental Justice in Georgia and Gentrification in Greenville, South Carolina.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2021
300
$a
176 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-12, Section: A.
500
$a
Advisor: Dickes, Lori.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Clemson University, 2021.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
Environmental justice research has found that poor and minority households are disproportionally exposed to environmental pollution than other groups in the United States. Scholars have used several hypotheses to explain this correlation including pure discrimination among groups by polluters, the location cost considerations of firms, the migratory responses of households to pollution, Coase theorem, and collective action hypotheses. This dissertation analyzes the question of "why the poor and minorities are more exposed to pollution" by testing the location cost and migration hypotheses using data from the state of Georgia. The dissertation also examined gentrification processes and impacts using Greenville, South Carolina as a case study and explores the link between gentrification, homelessness, and environmental justice.The location cost analysis employs a logistic regression model using secondary data at the census tract level on input costs, transportation costs, and firm location cost-related environmental justice factors, and tests the correlation of these factors with the location of toxic facilities. The migration analysis employs a 2-Stage Least Squares model to analyze whether migration explains the disproportionate exposure of poor and minority groups to pollution while the gentrification study employs qualitative interview and focus group methods to understand gentrification processes and impacts.Results show that while location cost explains some of the disproportionate exposure to pollution, migration does not appear to explain why the poor and minorities are more exposed to toxic facilities. In other words, the poor and minorities are not more exposed to toxic facilities because they migrated to live where those toxic facilities are but rather, location costs and other factors explain why these groups are more exposed to pollution.
590
$a
School code: 0050.
650
4
$a
Environmental justice.
$3
528369
650
4
$a
Land use planning.
$3
2122760
650
4
$a
Social research.
$3
2122687
653
$a
Community Development
653
$a
Environmental Justice
653
$a
Firm Location Costs
653
$a
Gentrification
690
$a
0619
690
$a
0344
690
$a
0536
710
2
$a
Clemson University.
$b
Policy Studies.
$3
3548694
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
82-12A.
790
$a
0050
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2021
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28419641
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9469765
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login