東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Serbi-Mongolic language family: Old Chinese, Middle Chinese, Old Mandarin, and Old Tibetan records on the Hsien-pei (Xianbei) languages and their relationship to Mongolic, with notes on Chinese and Old Tibetan phonology.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Serbi-Mongolic language family: Old Chinese, Middle Chinese, Old Mandarin, and Old Tibetan records on the Hsien-pei (Xianbei) languages and their relationship to Mongolic, with notes on Chinese and Old Tibetan phonology./
作者:	Shimunek, Andrew Eric.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2013,
面頁冊數:	393 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International75-03A.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3587660
ISBN:	9781303250200

The Serbi-Mongolic language family: Old Chinese, Middle Chinese, Old Mandarin, and Old Tibetan records on the Hsien-pei (Xianbei) languages and their relationship to Mongolic, with notes on Chinese and Old Tibetan phonology.
Shimunek, Andrew Eric.

The Serbi-Mongolic language family: Old Chinese, Middle Chinese, Old Mandarin, and Old Tibetan records on the Hsien-pei (Xianbei) languages and their relationship to Mongolic, with notes on Chinese and Old Tibetan phonology. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2013 - 393 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2013.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Although most scholars now generally agree that the Serbi (Hsien-pei or Xianbei) languages, including Kitan or 'Khitan' (Ch'i-tan or Qidan) and Taghbach or 'Tabghatch' (T'o-pa or Tuoba), are divergently related to Mongolic, up until now their Mongolic affinity has only been hinted at-no rigorous, systematic attempt has been made to present a precise, testable, and potentially falsifiable theory based on the standard historical-comparative linguistic criteria for language classification. I demonstrate in this dissertation that Kitan, Taghbach, and 'Azha-the best attested Serbi languages-are related to Mongolic, but descend not from Proto-Mongolic, but from Proto-Serbi, and that both Proto-Mongolic and Proto-Serbi descend from a common ancestor, Proto-Serbi-Mongolic. For early languages which have been extensively studied by historical linguists, general grammatical sketches are usually not a prerequisite to a historical-comparative linguistic study involving data from such languages, but very few general linguists have studied the Serbi languages. To date, with few exceptions, Taghbach, Kitan, and 'Azha have mostly been studied by philologists and historians who have not been particularly interested in describing their lexicons, phonologies, and grammatical structures in such a way as to compare them with other languages at both synchronic and diachronic levels. This preliminary work is necessary before demonstrating their divergent relationship with Mongolic. This dissertation thus presents brief sketches of as much as can be gleaned of the linguistic structures of Taghbach, 'Azha, and Kitan. Since most of these languages are primarily known from Chinese and Old Tibetan transcriptions, I first provide phonological accounts of the transcriptional languages-frontier varieties of Old Chinese, Middle Chinese, Old Mandarin, and Old Tibetan. The linguistic approach to Serbi data in this dissertation has also allowed for a preliminary reconstruction of Proto-Serbi-Mongolic, identification of ethnolinguistic contacts in the formative early history and prehistory of the Serbi-Mongolic language family, and a revised analysis of Kitan Assembled Script orthography.

ISBN: 9781303250200Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Chinese

The Serbi-Mongolic language family: Old Chinese, Middle Chinese, Old Mandarin, and Old Tibetan records on the Hsien-pei (Xianbei) languages and their relationship to Mongolic, with notes on Chinese and Old Tibetan phonology.
LDR:03714nmm a2200433 4500 001 2346982
005 20220706051339.5
008 241004s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303250200
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3587660
035 $a (MiAaPQ)indiana:12175
035 $a AAI3587660
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Shimunek, Andrew Eric. $3 3686190
245 1 4 $a The Serbi-Mongolic language family: Old Chinese, Middle Chinese, Old Mandarin, and Old Tibetan records on the Hsien-pei (Xianbei) languages and their relationship to Mongolic, with notes on Chinese and Old Tibetan phonology.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2013
300 $a 393 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Beckwith, Christopher I.;Kara, Gyorgy.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2013.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Although most scholars now generally agree that the Serbi (Hsien-pei or Xianbei) languages, including Kitan or 'Khitan' (Ch'i-tan or Qidan) and Taghbach or 'Tabghatch' (T'o-pa or Tuoba), are divergently related to Mongolic, up until now their Mongolic affinity has only been hinted at-no rigorous, systematic attempt has been made to present a precise, testable, and potentially falsifiable theory based on the standard historical-comparative linguistic criteria for language classification. I demonstrate in this dissertation that Kitan, Taghbach, and 'Azha-the best attested Serbi languages-are related to Mongolic, but descend not from Proto-Mongolic, but from Proto-Serbi, and that both Proto-Mongolic and Proto-Serbi descend from a common ancestor, Proto-Serbi-Mongolic. For early languages which have been extensively studied by historical linguists, general grammatical sketches are usually not a prerequisite to a historical-comparative linguistic study involving data from such languages, but very few general linguists have studied the Serbi languages. To date, with few exceptions, Taghbach, Kitan, and 'Azha have mostly been studied by philologists and historians who have not been particularly interested in describing their lexicons, phonologies, and grammatical structures in such a way as to compare them with other languages at both synchronic and diachronic levels. This preliminary work is necessary before demonstrating their divergent relationship with Mongolic. This dissertation thus presents brief sketches of as much as can be gleaned of the linguistic structures of Taghbach, 'Azha, and Kitan. Since most of these languages are primarily known from Chinese and Old Tibetan transcriptions, I first provide phonological accounts of the transcriptional languages-frontier varieties of Old Chinese, Middle Chinese, Old Mandarin, and Old Tibetan. The linguistic approach to Serbi data in this dissertation has also allowed for a preliminary reconstruction of Proto-Serbi-Mongolic, identification of ethnolinguistic contacts in the formative early history and prehistory of the Serbi-Mongolic language family, and a revised analysis of Kitan Assembled Script orthography.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a History. $3 516518
650 4 $a Asian Studies. $3 1669375
653 $a Chinese
653 $a Historical linguistics
653 $a Kitan
653 $a Mongolic
653 $a Phonology
653 $a Tibetan
653 $a Xianbei
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0332
690 $a 0342
710 2 $a Indiana University. $b Linguistics. $3 1674911
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 75-03A.
790 $a 0093
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3587660