東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Applying Alternative Heritage Discourses to Heritage Management Practices: A Cross-Case Comparative Synthesis.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Applying Alternative Heritage Discourses to Heritage Management Practices: A Cross-Case Comparative Synthesis./
Author:	Lawrence, Bridget .
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
Description:	69 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-02.
Subject:	Archaeology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13856206
ISBN:	9781085559591

Applying Alternative Heritage Discourses to Heritage Management Practices: A Cross-Case Comparative Synthesis.
Lawrence, Bridget .

Applying Alternative Heritage Discourses to Heritage Management Practices: A Cross-Case Comparative Synthesis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 69 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-02.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of California, San Diego, 2019.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

There is a prevailing discourse in cultural heritage management which privileges the investigation, interpretation, and conservation of heritage sites by a small group of heritage experts (Smith 2006). However, some heritage experts are challenging this discourse and recommending alternative heritage principles such as multivocality, providing more public access to heritage sites, and encouraging non-heritage experts to define their own value and meaning of heritage (Smith and Wobst 2006a; Liebmann and Rizvi 2008). Such alternative discourses are gaining the attention of heritage management authorities, but there has been no comprehensive comparative analysis of case studies where alternative heritage management principles are an integral part of the research design to determine whether they are successful and what characteristics of such projects are contributing to their success. A cross-case comparative analysis of eleven heritage management projects with a common goal of recording or monitoring sites threatened by climate change reveals that including principles from alternative heritage discourses is linked to better heritage management outcomes.

ISBN: 9781085559591Subjects--Topical Terms:

558412
Archaeology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Citizen science

Applying Alternative Heritage Discourses to Heritage Management Practices: A Cross-Case Comparative Synthesis.
LDR:02408nmm a2200373 4500 001 2344300
005 20220523132424.5
008 241004s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781085559591
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13856206
035 $a AAI13856206
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lawrence, Bridget . $3 3683069
245 1 0 $a Applying Alternative Heritage Discourses to Heritage Management Practices: A Cross-Case Comparative Synthesis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 69 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-02.
500 $a Advisor: Rivera-Collazo, Isabel.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of California, San Diego, 2019.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a There is a prevailing discourse in cultural heritage management which privileges the investigation, interpretation, and conservation of heritage sites by a small group of heritage experts (Smith 2006). However, some heritage experts are challenging this discourse and recommending alternative heritage principles such as multivocality, providing more public access to heritage sites, and encouraging non-heritage experts to define their own value and meaning of heritage (Smith and Wobst 2006a; Liebmann and Rizvi 2008). Such alternative discourses are gaining the attention of heritage management authorities, but there has been no comprehensive comparative analysis of case studies where alternative heritage management principles are an integral part of the research design to determine whether they are successful and what characteristics of such projects are contributing to their success. A cross-case comparative analysis of eleven heritage management projects with a common goal of recording or monitoring sites threatened by climate change reveals that including principles from alternative heritage discourses is linked to better heritage management outcomes.
590 $a School code: 0033.
650 4 $a Archaeology. $3 558412
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
650 4 $a Cultural resources management. $3 2122774
653 $a Citizen science
653 $a Climate change
653 $a Heritage discourse
653 $a Heritage management
690 $a 0324
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0436
710 2 $a University of California, San Diego. $b Anthropology. $3 1043947
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-02.
790 $a 0033
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13856206