東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Designing for Equity in Collaborative Environmental Governance: A Case Study of Regional Climate Change Collaboratives.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Designing for Equity in Collaborative Environmental Governance: A Case Study of Regional Climate Change Collaboratives./
Author:	Renirie, Alex W.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
Description:	91 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-03.
Subject:	Environmental studies. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28545913
ISBN:	9798538168286

Designing for Equity in Collaborative Environmental Governance: A Case Study of Regional Climate Change Collaboratives.
Renirie, Alex W.

Designing for Equity in Collaborative Environmental Governance: A Case Study of Regional Climate Change Collaboratives. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 91 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Oregon, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Collaborative governance is an increasingly popular method for managing complex socio-ecological problems such as climate change. While collaboration seeks to involve diverse stakeholders in the decisions that affect their lives, little research addresses how structural power dynamics impact marginalized groups' ability to exert influence within these processes. Practitioners and scholars commonly assume that inclusive participation will advance equitable participation without critically considering the fundamentally unequal systems in which collaboratives operate. This research expands on Jill Purdy's framework for assessing power in collaborative settings and applies it to six regional climate collaboratives. Using a comparative case study model, interviews were conducted with coordinators and community-based organizations in each case. Their responses illuminated how power is wielded and managed in these groups and how process designers can help balance structural power. The resulting list of strategies are intended to support facilitators to actively promote equitable participation in this emergent form of governance.

ISBN: 9798538168286Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122803
Environmental studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Collaborative Governance

Designing for Equity in Collaborative Environmental Governance: A Case Study of Regional Climate Change Collaboratives.
LDR:02352nmm a2200397 4500 001 2344186
005 20230315113027.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798538168286
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28545913
035 $a AAI28545913
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Renirie, Alex W. $3 3682937
245 1 0 $a Designing for Equity in Collaborative Environmental Governance: A Case Study of Regional Climate Change Collaboratives.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 91 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.
500 $a Advisor: Margerum, Richard.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--University of Oregon, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Collaborative governance is an increasingly popular method for managing complex socio-ecological problems such as climate change. While collaboration seeks to involve diverse stakeholders in the decisions that affect their lives, little research addresses how structural power dynamics impact marginalized groups' ability to exert influence within these processes. Practitioners and scholars commonly assume that inclusive participation will advance equitable participation without critically considering the fundamentally unequal systems in which collaboratives operate. This research expands on Jill Purdy's framework for assessing power in collaborative settings and applies it to six regional climate collaboratives. Using a comparative case study model, interviews were conducted with coordinators and community-based organizations in each case. Their responses illuminated how power is wielded and managed in these groups and how process designers can help balance structural power. The resulting list of strategies are intended to support facilitators to actively promote equitable participation in this emergent form of governance.
590 $a School code: 0171.
650 4 $a Environmental studies. $3 2122803
650 4 $a Urban planning. $3 2122922
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
650 4 $a Social exclusion. $3 3560770
650 4 $a Collaboration. $3 3556296
650 4 $a Political power. $3 3544642
650 4 $a Democracy. $3 519163
650 4 $a Decision making. $3 517204
650 4 $a Empowerment. $2 lcstt $3 3266631
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
653 $a Collaborative Governance
653 $a Conflict resolution
653 $a Equity
690 $a 0477
690 $a 0999
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a University of Oregon. $b Conflict and Dispute Resolution Program. $3 3170096
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-03.
790 $a 0171
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28545913